AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
8d4e11415d
v8/test/cctest/interpreter/bytecode_expectations/ForOfLoop.golden

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1331 lines
48 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
#
# Autogenerated by generate-bytecode-expectations.
#
---
wrap: no
test function name: f
---
snippet: "
function f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) { let y = x; }
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
frame size: 17
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
bytecode array length: 245
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 10 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(13),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
[objects] Make feedback vector a first-class object Instead of having feedback vector as a subtype of FixedArray with reserved slots, make it a first-class variable-sized object with a fixed-size header. This allows us to compress counters to ints in the header, rather than forcing them to be Smis. Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng Change-Id: Icc5f088ffbc2e2651b845bc71ea42060639e3e48 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/585129 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46935}
2017-07-27 12:45:00 +00:00
/* 34 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(0), U8(0),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
B(CallProperty0), R(16), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
B(Star), R(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 34 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(1), U8(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 29 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(5), R(4), U8(6),
B(Star), R(6),
/* 29 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(6), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(6), U8(1),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(2), U8(8),
Skip hole initialization of lexical variables when possible This patch expands scope analysis to skip hole initialization when it can be determined statically that no hole checks will be generated at runtime. Two conditions must be met to safely eliminate hole initialization: - There must not exist a VariableProxy referencing this Variable whose HoleCheckMode is kRequired - The Variable must be stack allocated; any other allocation implies that it may be accessed from not-yet-analyzed scopes (other modules, inner functions, or eval code) and that code may require hole checks. The new logic required removing debug code in full-codegen which is now incorrect in some cases. Also fixed Variable's bitfield helpers to take no more space than needed. Bug: chromium:651637 Change-Id: Ie5ac326af4e05b7a5c3c37cd4d0afba6a51a504d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494006 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45170}
2017-05-08 18:55:54 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(28),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(3), U8(10),
B(Star), R(8),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
B(Mov), R(8), R(3),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 20 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Skip hole initialization of lexical variables when possible This patch expands scope analysis to skip hole initialization when it can be determined statically that no hole checks will be generated at runtime. Two conditions must be met to safely eliminate hole initialization: - There must not exist a VariableProxy referencing this Variable whose HoleCheckMode is kRequired - The Variable must be stack allocated; any other allocation implies that it may be accessed from not-yet-analyzed scopes (other modules, inner functions, or eval code) and that code may require hole checks. The new logic required removing debug code in full-codegen which is now incorrect in some cases. Also fixed Variable's bitfield helpers to take no more space than needed. Bug: chromium:651637 Change-Id: Ie5ac326af4e05b7a5c3c37cd4d0afba6a51a504d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494006 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45170}
2017-05-08 18:55:54 +00:00
B(Mov), R(3), R(1),
/* 49 S> */ B(Mov), R(1), R(0),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
B(JumpLoop), U8(47), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
/* 49 E> */ B(CreateCatchContext), R(15), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(15),
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(16), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(13),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(5), U8(14),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(9),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(6),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(14), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
B(Mov), R(9), R(15),
B(Mov), R(4), R(16),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(15), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(9), R(14),
B(Mov), R(4), R(15),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(14), U8(2),
B(Star), R(10),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(10), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(10), U8(1),
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[ignition] Optimizing Smi only comparisons There are various situations where we explicitly compare a SMI against another SMI (e.g., BuildIndexedJump). This is also a common pattern for generated code (e.g., comparing a loop variable with an integer). Instead of using the generic equality/strict-equality stub for this, which is expensive, this CL offers a simple comparison stub, repurposing the TestEqualStrictNoFeedback bytecode to TestReferenceEqual Bug: v8:5310 Change-Id: Ib2b47cd24d5386cf0d20d3bd794776dc6e3a02a5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1007542 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Christian O. Andersson <cricke@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52655}
2018-04-18 00:04:34 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(11),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 54 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
]
handlers: [
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[7, 121, 129],
[parser] Alternative fix for chromium:740591 - Previous fix is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/583531 but it diverges Scopes created by PreParser from Scopes created by Parser. - This CL creates the inner block scope a bit earlier and (temporarily) pushes it into the scope chain for parsing the variable declarations in a for loop. The previous approach was to first parse the variable declarations and then reparent the AST nodes / Scopes created while parsing it afterwards. - This CL partially reverts https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/583531; the new fix only touches parser-base.h (diff between patch sets 2 and 3 is the fix). - The Ignition golden changes are basically undoing the changes done in that CL too. Bug: chromium:740591 Change-Id: Iceff1383ef066317e754942bb5ff0c70a91bc937 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/603787 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47241}
2017-08-09 08:00:20 +00:00
[10, 88, 90],
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[189, 199, 201],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
function f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) { eval('1'); }
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
frame size: 24
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
bytecode array length: 325
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(CreateFunctionContext), U8(0), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(this),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(5),
B(Ldar), R(arg0),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
B(CreateMappedArguments),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(8),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(6),
/* 10 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(13),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
/* 34 S> */ B(LdaContextSlot), R(10), U8(4), U8(0),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(15), U8(2), U8(0),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
B(CallProperty0), R(16), R(15), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
B(Star), R(1),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
/* 34 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(1), U8(3), U8(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 29 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(2), R(1), U8(6),
B(Star), R(3),
/* 29 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(3), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(3), U8(1),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(3), U8(4), U8(8),
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(76),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(3), U8(5), U8(10),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
B(Mov), R(5), R(0),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 20 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(6),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(5),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
/* 41 S> */ B(LdaLookupGlobalSlot), U8(7), U8(12), U8(3),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(8),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(37),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(22),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(41),
B(Star), R(23),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(Mov), R(16), R(18),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(17), R(19),
B(Mov), R(closure), R(20),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kResolvePossiblyDirectEval), R(18), U8(6),
B(Star), R(16),
/* 41 E> */ B(CallUndefinedReceiver1), R(16), R(17), U8(14),
B(PopContext), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(JumpLoop), U8(95), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(15), U8(9),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(15),
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(4), U8(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(16), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(4), U8(17),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(1), U8(10), U8(18),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(4), U8(20),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(6),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(11),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(14), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
B(Mov), R(6), R(15),
B(Mov), R(1), R(16),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(15), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(6), R(14),
B(Mov), R(1), R(15),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(14), U8(2),
B(Star), R(7),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(7), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(7), U8(1),
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[ignition] Optimizing Smi only comparisons There are various situations where we explicitly compare a SMI against another SMI (e.g., BuildIndexedJump). This is also a common pattern for generated code (e.g., comparing a loop variable with an integer). Instead of using the generic equality/strict-equality stub for this, which is expensive, this CL offers a simple comparison stub, repurposing the TestEqualStrictNoFeedback bytecode to TestReferenceEqual Bug: v8:5310 Change-Id: Ib2b47cd24d5386cf0d20d3bd794776dc6e3a02a5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1007542 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Christian O. Andersson <cricke@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52655}
2018-04-18 00:04:34 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(11),
[interpreter] Avoid redundant {PopContext} instructions. This avoids emitting redundant {PopContext} bytecode instructions when non-local control-flow leaves the method body. It also folds multiple such {PopContext} instructions into one, in case several scoping levels are crossed at one. Only the expected context of the target of a local control-flow transfer matters. R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TEST=debugger/regress/regress-crbug-724858 BUG=chromium:724858 Change-Id: Id4a47ae9fea25e75ae1af13619720b16a3975edf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/512545 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45507}
2017-05-24 08:08:21 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PopContext), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 54 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["eval"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["1"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
]
handlers: [
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[34, 199, 207],
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
[37, 166, 168],
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[267, 277, 279],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
function f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) { (function() { return x; })(); }
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
frame size: 15
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
bytecode array length: 261
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 10 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(11),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(12),
[objects] Make feedback vector a first-class object Instead of having feedback vector as a subtype of FixedArray with reserved slots, make it a first-class variable-sized object with a fixed-size header. This allows us to compress counters to ints in the header, rather than forcing them to be Smis. Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng Change-Id: Icc5f088ffbc2e2651b845bc71ea42060639e3e48 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/585129 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46935}
2017-07-27 12:45:00 +00:00
/* 34 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(0), U8(0),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
B(CallProperty0), R(14), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
B(Star), R(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 34 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(2), U8(1), U8(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 29 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(3), R(2), U8(6),
B(Star), R(4),
/* 29 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(4), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(4), U8(1),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(2), U8(8),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(44),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(3), U8(10),
B(Star), R(6),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
B(Mov), R(6), R(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 20 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[Cleanup][Interpreter] Move feedback slot allocation to bytecode generator Moves the feedback vector slot allocation out of ast-numbering and into bytecode generation directly. This has a couple of benifits, including reduced AST size, avoid code duplication and reduced feedback vector sizes in many cases due to only allocating slots when needed. Also removes AstProperties since this is no longer needed. AstNumbering is now only used to allocate suspend ids for generators. BUG=v8:6921 Change-Id: I103e8593c94ef5b2e56c34ef4f77bd6e7d64796f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/722959 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48757}
2017-10-19 15:12:42 +00:00
/* 41 S> */ B(CreateClosure), U8(5), U8(12), U8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
/* 67 E> */ B(CallUndefinedReceiver0), R(14), U8(13),
B(PopContext), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
B(JumpLoop), U8(63), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(13), U8(6),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(13),
B(Star), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(5), U8(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(14), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(5), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(2), U8(7), U8(17),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(5), U8(19),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(7),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(8),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(12), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(12),
B(Mov), R(7), R(13),
B(Mov), R(2), R(14),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(13), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(7), R(12),
B(Mov), R(2), R(13),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(12), U8(2),
B(Star), R(8),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(8), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(8), U8(1),
B(Ldar), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[ignition] Optimizing Smi only comparisons There are various situations where we explicitly compare a SMI against another SMI (e.g., BuildIndexedJump). This is also a common pattern for generated code (e.g., comparing a loop variable with an integer). Instead of using the generic equality/strict-equality stub for this, which is expensive, this CL offers a simple comparison stub, repurposing the TestEqualStrictNoFeedback bytecode to TestReferenceEqual Bug: v8:5310 Change-Id: Ib2b47cd24d5386cf0d20d3bd794776dc6e3a02a5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1007542 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Christian O. Andersson <cricke@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52655}
2018-04-18 00:04:34 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(9),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 73 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
]
handlers: [
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[7, 137, 145],
Replace Context::closure with Context::scope_info, allowing closure to die. There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL: - context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters. - ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot. Bug: v8:7066 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
2018-05-02 13:57:26 +00:00
[10, 104, 106],
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[205, 215, 217],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
function f(arr) {
for (let { x, y } of arr) { let z = x + y; }
}
f([{ x: 0, y: 3 }, { x: 1, y: 9 }, { x: -12, y: 17 }]);
"
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
frame size: 20
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
bytecode array length: 283
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 10 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(16),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(17),
[objects] Make feedback vector a first-class object Instead of having feedback vector as a subtype of FixedArray with reserved slots, make it a first-class variable-sized object with a fixed-size header. This allows us to compress counters to ints in the header, rather than forcing them to be Smis. Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng Change-Id: Icc5f088ffbc2e2651b845bc71ea42060639e3e48 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/585129 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46935}
2017-07-27 12:45:00 +00:00
/* 41 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(0), U8(0),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
B(CallProperty0), R(19), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(18),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
B(Star), R(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 41 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(1), U8(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 36 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(8), R(7), U8(6),
B(Star), R(9),
/* 36 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(9), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(9), U8(1),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(9), U8(2), U8(8),
Skip hole initialization of lexical variables when possible This patch expands scope analysis to skip hole initialization when it can be determined statically that no hole checks will be generated at runtime. Two conditions must be met to safely eliminate hole initialization: - There must not exist a VariableProxy referencing this Variable whose HoleCheckMode is kRequired - The Variable must be stack allocated; any other allocation implies that it may be accessed from not-yet-analyzed scopes (other modules, inner functions, or eval code) and that code may require hole checks. The new logic required removing debug code in full-codegen which is now incorrect in some cases. Also fixed Variable's bitfield helpers to take no more space than needed. Bug: chromium:651637 Change-Id: Ie5ac326af4e05b7a5c3c37cd4d0afba6a51a504d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494006 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45170}
2017-05-08 18:55:54 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(66),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(9), U8(3), U8(10),
B(Star), R(11),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
B(Mov), R(11), R(5),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 20 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Skip hole initialization of lexical variables when possible This patch expands scope analysis to skip hole initialization when it can be determined statically that no hole checks will be generated at runtime. Two conditions must be met to safely eliminate hole initialization: - There must not exist a VariableProxy referencing this Variable whose HoleCheckMode is kRequired - The Variable must be stack allocated; any other allocation implies that it may be accessed from not-yet-analyzed scopes (other modules, inner functions, or eval code) and that code may require hole checks. The new logic required removing debug code in full-codegen which is now incorrect in some cases. Also fixed Variable's bitfield helpers to take no more space than needed. Bug: chromium:651637 Change-Id: Ie5ac326af4e05b7a5c3c37cd4d0afba6a51a504d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494006 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45170}
2017-05-08 18:55:54 +00:00
B(Mov), R(5), R(6),
[ignition] Fix register flushing performance issue In some codes flushing the registers was costly: we processed each register whereas all the registers alone in their equivalence class need not to be processed. We now overapproximate easily which classes are of size 2 so as to save many iterations in the Flush() loop in some cases. Bug: v8:6432 Change-Id: I945e151736e8a515263ac76312127d930fd20d74 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/525795 Commit-Queue: Alexandre Talon <alexandret@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45805}
2017-06-09 09:26:27 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfUndefined), U8(6),
B(Ldar), R(6),
B(JumpIfNotNull), U8(16),
[Intl] Implement Intl.ListFromat format() and formatToParts(). Spec: http://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-list-format/ Design Doc: go/add-intl.listformat-to-v8 Test: intl/list-format/* R=gsathya@chromium.org, mvstanton@chromium.org Bug: v8:7871 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I820c205ca842c228ffe37f7e1648667f30f80bd8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1126683 Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#54991}
2018-08-08 23:04:11 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(81),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(4),
B(Star), R(19),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(18), U8(2),
[parser] Better error message when destructuring against undefined/null Previously, when destructuring against null or undefined we would print: d8> var { x } = null (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot match against 'undefined' or 'null'. var { x } = null ^ TypeError: Cannot match against 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 The above message uses the term "match" which isn't a common term in JavaScript to describe destructuring. This message also doesn't provide the name of the property that fails destructuring. This patch changes the error message to be: d8> var { x } = null; (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot destructure property `x` of 'undefined' or 'null'. var { x } = null; ^ TypeError: Cannot destructure property `x` of 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 This patch changes the message to say "destructure" instead of "match". This patch adds support for printing property names that are string literals. We iterate through every property and pick the first string literal property name if it exists. This provides at least some feedback to the developer. This patch also makes the pointer point to the position of the property name that fails destructuring. For computed and numeric property names, we print a generic error: d8> var { 1: x } = null (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot destructure against 'undefined' or 'null'. var { 1: x } = null ^ TypeError: Cannot destructure against 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 Bug: v8:6499 Change-Id: I35b1ac749489828686f042975294b9926e2dfc53 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/537341 Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45965}
2017-06-15 21:24:37 +00:00
/* 31 E> */ B(Throw),
[Cleanup][Interpreter] Move feedback slot allocation to bytecode generator Moves the feedback vector slot allocation out of ast-numbering and into bytecode generation directly. This has a couple of benifits, including reduced AST size, avoid code duplication and reduced feedback vector sizes in many cases due to only allocating slots when needed. Also removes AstProperties since this is no longer needed. AstNumbering is now only used to allocate suspend ids for generators. BUG=v8:6921 Change-Id: I103e8593c94ef5b2e56c34ef4f77bd6e7d64796f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/722959 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48757}
2017-10-19 15:12:42 +00:00
/* 31 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(4), U8(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(1),
[Cleanup][Interpreter] Move feedback slot allocation to bytecode generator Moves the feedback vector slot allocation out of ast-numbering and into bytecode generation directly. This has a couple of benifits, including reduced AST size, avoid code duplication and reduced feedback vector sizes in many cases due to only allocating slots when needed. Also removes AstProperties since this is no longer needed. AstNumbering is now only used to allocate suspend ids for generators. BUG=v8:6921 Change-Id: I103e8593c94ef5b2e56c34ef4f77bd6e7d64796f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/722959 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48757}
2017-10-19 15:12:42 +00:00
/* 34 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(5), U8(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(2),
[inspector] moved var initialization break location before init expression (reland) This CL improves break locations for expressions like 'var a = <expr>'. Without CL we use <expr> position as break location for initialization statement, with this CL we use position of first character after '=' as position. Benefits (see test for details): - only one break in expressions which includes mix of property lookup and calls, e.g. var p = Promise.resolve().then(x => x * 2), - removed redundant break location for expressions like: let { x, y } = { x: 1, y: 2}. TBR=dgozman@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,kozyatinskiy@chromium.org,devtools-reviews@chromium.org,v8-reviews@googlegroups.com # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: v8:5909 Change-Id: Ie84fa79afeed09e28cf8478ba610a0cfbfdfc294 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/518116 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45598}
2017-05-30 12:25:55 +00:00
/* 56 S> */ B(Ldar), R(2),
[Cleanup][Interpreter] Move feedback slot allocation to bytecode generator Moves the feedback vector slot allocation out of ast-numbering and into bytecode generation directly. This has a couple of benifits, including reduced AST size, avoid code duplication and reduced feedback vector sizes in many cases due to only allocating slots when needed. Also removes AstProperties since this is no longer needed. AstNumbering is now only used to allocate suspend ids for generators. BUG=v8:6921 Change-Id: I103e8593c94ef5b2e56c34ef4f77bd6e7d64796f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/722959 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48757}
2017-10-19 15:12:42 +00:00
/* 58 E> */ B(Add), R(1), U8(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Star), R(0),
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
B(JumpLoop), U8(85), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
/* 56 E> */ B(CreateCatchContext), R(18), U8(6),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(18),
B(Star), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(10), U8(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(19), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(18),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(10), U8(18),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(7), U8(19),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(10), U8(21),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(8),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(17), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(17),
B(Mov), R(12), R(18),
B(Mov), R(7), R(19),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(18), U8(2),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Mov), R(12), R(17),
B(Mov), R(7), R(18),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(17), U8(2),
B(Star), R(13),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(13), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(13), U8(1),
B(Ldar), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[ignition] Optimizing Smi only comparisons There are various situations where we explicitly compare a SMI against another SMI (e.g., BuildIndexedJump). This is also a common pattern for generated code (e.g., comparing a loop variable with an integer). Instead of using the generic equality/strict-equality stub for this, which is expensive, this CL offers a simple comparison stub, repurposing the TestEqualStrictNoFeedback bytecode to TestReferenceEqual Bug: v8:5310 Change-Id: Ib2b47cd24d5386cf0d20d3bd794776dc6e3a02a5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1007542 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Christian O. Andersson <cricke@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52655}
2018-04-18 00:04:34 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(14),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 65 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["x"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["y"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
[parser] Better error message when destructuring against undefined/null Previously, when destructuring against null or undefined we would print: d8> var { x } = null (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot match against 'undefined' or 'null'. var { x } = null ^ TypeError: Cannot match against 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 The above message uses the term "match" which isn't a common term in JavaScript to describe destructuring. This message also doesn't provide the name of the property that fails destructuring. This patch changes the error message to be: d8> var { x } = null; (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot destructure property `x` of 'undefined' or 'null'. var { x } = null; ^ TypeError: Cannot destructure property `x` of 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 This patch changes the message to say "destructure" instead of "match". This patch adds support for printing property names that are string literals. We iterate through every property and pick the first string literal property name if it exists. This provides at least some feedback to the developer. This patch also makes the pointer point to the position of the property name that fails destructuring. For computed and numeric property names, we print a generic error: d8> var { 1: x } = null (d8):1: TypeError: Cannot destructure against 'undefined' or 'null'. var { 1: x } = null ^ TypeError: Cannot destructure against 'undefined' or 'null'. at (d8):1:1 Bug: v8:6499 Change-Id: I35b1ac749489828686f042975294b9926e2dfc53 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/537341 Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45965}
2017-06-15 21:24:37 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
handlers: [
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[7, 159, 167],
[parser] Alternative fix for chromium:740591 - Previous fix is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/583531 but it diverges Scopes created by PreParser from Scopes created by Parser. - This CL creates the inner block scope a bit earlier and (temporarily) pushes it into the scope chain for parsing the variable declarations in a for loop. The previous approach was to first parse the variable declarations and then reparent the AST nodes / Scopes created while parsing it afterwards. - This CL partially reverts https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/583531; the new fix only touches parser-base.h (diff between patch sets 2 and 3 is the fix). - The Ignition golden changes are basically undoing the changes done in that CL too. Bug: chromium:740591 Change-Id: Iceff1383ef066317e754942bb5ff0c70a91bc937 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/603787 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47241}
2017-08-09 08:00:20 +00:00
[10, 126, 128],
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
[227, 237, 239],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
function* f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) { let y = x; }
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
frame size: 18
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
bytecode array length: 286
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(SwitchOnGeneratorState), R(3), U8(0), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(closure), R(12),
B(Mov), R(this), R(13),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_CreateJSGeneratorObject), R(12), U8(2),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(SuspendGenerator), R(3), R(0), U8(12), U8(0),
B(ResumeGenerator), R(3), R(0), U8(12),
B(Star), R(12),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_GeneratorGetResumeMode), R(3), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(1), U8(2), I8(0),
B(Ldar), R(12),
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
Move generator-close on exception from the generator function to the GeneratorResume builtin. The change also moves creation of the iterator result from the parser to the bytecode generator. Unfortunately, async generators will stay on the old scheme (try-finally around generator body) because I am not exactly sure how they work. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2917263002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45713}
2017-06-05 19:54:14 +00:00
/* 55 S> */ B(Return),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(15),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 35 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(3), U8(0),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallProperty0), R(17), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 35 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(5), U8(4), U8(4),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
/* 30 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(6), R(5), U8(6),
B(Star), R(7),
/* 30 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(7), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(7), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(5), U8(8),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(28),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(6), U8(10),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
B(Mov), R(9), R(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 21 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Mov), R(4), R(1),
/* 50 S> */ B(Mov), R(1), R(0),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
B(JumpLoop), U8(47), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 50 E> */ B(CreateCatchContext), R(16), U8(7),
B(PushContext), R(16),
B(Star), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(12),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(17), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
This is a first step towards reducing the number of stores/loads when suspending/resuming a generator. Unfortunately, even for an empty generator, we still use 8 register for various things (try-finally, copies of generator object, parser-introduced temporaries). I will try to get rid of these in separate CLs. Changes: - SuspendGenerator bytecode now takes register list to save. - ResumeGenerator was split into two bytecodes: * Resume generator reads the state out and marks the generator as 'executing'. * RestoreGeneratorRegisters reloads the registers from the generator. + this required adding support for output register list. - Introduced generator_object_ register in the bytecode generator. * in subsequent CLs, I will make better use of it, the goal is to get rid if the .generator_object local variable. - Taught register optimizer to flush unassigned registers. BUG=v8:6379 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2894293003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45675}
2017-06-02 11:55:48 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
B(Star), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(13),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(5), U8(8), U8(14),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(10),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
B(LdaConstant), U8(9),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(15), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(15),
B(Mov), R(10), R(16),
B(Mov), R(5), R(17),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(16), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(15),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(10), R(15),
B(Mov), R(5), R(16),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(15), U8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(11), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(11), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(12),
Move generator-close on exception from the generator function to the GeneratorResume builtin. The change also moves creation of the iterator result from the parser to the bytecode generator. Unfortunately, async generators will stay on the old scheme (try-finally around generator body) because I am not exactly sure how they work. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2917263002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45713}
2017-06-05 19:54:14 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 55 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
Smi [22],
Move closing of generators upon final return to the generator-resume builtin. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2936813002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45906}
2017-06-13 13:49:45 +00:00
Smi [10],
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
Smi [7],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
]
handlers: [
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
[48, 162, 170],
[51, 129, 131],
[230, 240, 242],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
function* f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) yield x;
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
frame size: 17
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
bytecode array length: 330
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(SwitchOnGeneratorState), R(2), U8(0), U8(2),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(closure), R(11),
B(Mov), R(this), R(12),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_CreateJSGeneratorObject), R(11), U8(2),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(SuspendGenerator), R(2), R(0), U8(11), U8(0),
B(ResumeGenerator), R(2), R(0), U8(11),
B(Star), R(11),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_GeneratorGetResumeMode), R(2), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(2), U8(2), I8(0),
B(Ldar), R(11),
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
/* 11 E> */ B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(11),
Move generator-close on exception from the generator function to the GeneratorResume builtin. The change also moves creation of the iterator result from the parser to the bytecode generator. Unfortunately, async generators will stay on the old scheme (try-finally around generator body) because I am not exactly sure how they work. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2917263002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45713}
2017-06-05 19:54:14 +00:00
/* 49 S> */ B(Return),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(13),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 35 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(4), U8(0),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallProperty0), R(16), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 35 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(5), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
/* 30 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(5), R(4), U8(6),
B(Star), R(6),
/* 30 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(6), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(6), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(6), U8(8),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(65),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(7), U8(10),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
B(Mov), R(8), R(3),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 21 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Mov), R(3), R(0),
[interpreter] refactor BuildGeneratorSuspend/Resume into BuildSuspendPoint Simplify the model for generating Awaits, because the resume point is always immediately following the suspend point, and registers used are always the same for both operations. Includes a minor refactoring of BytecodeGenerator::VisitYield() to perform iterator result creation before the SuspendGenerator bytecode, rather than between SuspendGenerator and Return. This adds a small number of bytecodes for each yield. BUG=v8:2355, v8:5855 Change-Id: I4868b89a6bc1b251f887d2a45890c8fa19f7b089 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/576286 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46820}
2017-07-20 12:35:28 +00:00
/* 40 S> */ B(LdaFalse),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(15),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_CreateIterResultObject), R(15), U8(2),
/* 40 E> */ B(SuspendGenerator), R(2), R(0), U8(15), U8(1),
B(ResumeGenerator), R(2), R(0), U8(15),
B(Star), R(15),
[Interpreter] Remove new.target from fixed frame slot. Removes the new.target slot from the interpreter's fixed frame. Instead adds a field to BytecodeArray to get the bytecode's incoming new.target or generator object register. The InterpreterEntryTrampoline then sets this register with the incoming new.target (or generator object) when the function is called. This register can be directly the new.target or generator object variable if they are LOCAL location, otherwise it is a temporary register which is then moved to the variable's location during the function prologue. This fixes a hack in the deoptimizer where we would set the new.target fixed slot to undefined in order to avoid extending it's lifetime through the optimized code - now it's just a standard register and can be optimized away as normal. Bug=v8:6644 Change-Id: Ieb8cc34cccefd9fb6634a90cbc77c6002a54f2ae Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/608966 Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47320}
2017-08-11 15:16:31 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_GeneratorGetResumeMode), R(2), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(8), U8(2), I8(0),
B(Ldar), R(15),
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
/* 40 E> */ B(Throw),
[Interpreter] Allocate context registers as temporary registers. Rather than trying to pre-calculate the number of contexts required during scope analysis, instead just allocate context registers in the register allocator. This reduces frame size a bit due to reusing of registers when the context isn't pushed. BUG=v8:6322, chromium:716265 Change-Id: I145e38fcb3797a3b86c91e90ea9326a6e55b9b89 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/514087 Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45522}
2017-05-24 15:48:27 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
B(Mov), R(15), R(12),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(55),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(JumpLoop), U8(84), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(33),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(15), U8(10),
B(PushContext), R(15),
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(12),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(16), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
This is a first step towards reducing the number of stores/loads when suspending/resuming a generator. Unfortunately, even for an empty generator, we still use 8 register for various things (try-finally, copies of generator object, parser-introduced temporaries). I will try to get rid of these in separate CLs. Changes: - SuspendGenerator bytecode now takes register list to save. - ResumeGenerator was split into two bytecodes: * Resume generator reads the state out and marks the generator as 'executing'. * RestoreGeneratorRegisters reloads the registers from the generator. + this required adding support for output register list. - Introduced generator_object_ register in the bytecode generator. * in subsequent CLs, I will make better use of it, the goal is to get rid if the .generator_object local variable. - Taught register optimizer to flush unassigned registers. BUG=v8:6379 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2894293003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45675}
2017-06-02 11:55:48 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(8),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(13),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(4), U8(11), U8(14),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(7), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(9),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
B(LdaConstant), U8(12),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(14), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
B(Mov), R(9), R(15),
B(Mov), R(4), R(16),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(15), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(9), R(14),
B(Mov), R(4), R(15),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(14), U8(2),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(10),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(10), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(10), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(11),
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(13), U8(2), I8(0),
Move closing of generators upon final return to the generator-resume builtin. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2936813002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45906}
2017-06-13 13:49:45 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(8),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 49 S> */ B(Return),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 49 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
Smi [22],
Smi [135],
Move closing of generators upon final return to the generator-resume builtin. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2936813002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45906}
2017-06-13 13:49:45 +00:00
Smi [10],
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
Smi [7],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
Move generator-close on exception from the generator function to the GeneratorResume builtin. The change also moves creation of the iterator result from the parser to the bytecode generator. Unfortunately, async generators will stay on the old scheme (try-finally around generator body) because I am not exactly sure how they work. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2917263002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45713}
2017-06-05 19:54:14 +00:00
Smi [15],
[ignition] Use jump table for generator resume mode Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Iad82fcfb4172d7a9cbadffa1e40fd1cd26866895 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/521107 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45705}
2017-06-05 13:23:20 +00:00
Smi [7],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
[ignition] Use jump table for "finally" deferred commands Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I5d245ea485c93fcc03fcd95c82ae0474f31ffa5e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/505491 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45341}
2017-05-16 11:36:04 +00:00
Smi [6],
Move closing of generators upon final return to the generator-resume builtin. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2936813002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45906}
2017-06-13 13:49:45 +00:00
Smi [9],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
handlers: [
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
[48, 199, 207],
[51, 166, 168],
[268, 278, 280],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
async function f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) { let y = x; }
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
frame size: 23
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
bytecode array length: 367
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
[ignition] Move generator object creation to BytecodeGenerator This lets us avoid allocating the "this" variable for every generator, since the BytecodeGenerator can directly read the receiver via BytecodeArrayBuilder::Receive() when passing it into %_CreateJSGeneratorObject. Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Ib5e1f3303b6b5d5fc051ce76ea62129fd6afac65 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/500507 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45281}
2017-05-12 17:29:53 +00:00
/* 16 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[Interpreter] Make CallJSRuntime implicitly use undefined reciever. JS runtime calls are always created with undefined recievers, so make the bytecode behave similarly to CallUndefinedReciever such that we don't need to push an explicit undefined register for the receiver for such calls. Modifies the Async[Generator/Function]Await[Caught/Uncaught] runtime calls to pass the generator in the first argument rather than the reciever since these runtime calls were desugered in the bytecode generator and explicitly passed the generator in the receiver. Change-Id: I36c8087bb3b663dccd805bfdb1eea04eb6a73269 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/654257 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47870}
2017-09-06 22:48:36 +00:00
B(CallJSRuntime), U8(%async_function_promise_create), R(0), U8(0),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(0),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(15),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(19),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(20),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 40 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(0), U8(0),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(22),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallProperty0), R(22), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(21),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
/* 40 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(1), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
/* 35 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(7), R(6), U8(6),
B(Star), R(8),
/* 35 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(8), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(8), U8(1),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(8), U8(2), U8(8),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(28),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(8), U8(3), U8(10),
B(Star), R(10),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
B(Mov), R(10), R(5),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 26 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(5), R(2),
/* 55 S> */ B(Mov), R(2), R(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(JumpLoop), U8(47), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(37),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 55 E> */ B(CreateCatchContext), R(21), U8(4),
B(Star), R(20),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(20),
B(PushContext), R(21),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(9), U8(12),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(9),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(22),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(22), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(21),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
B(Star), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(9), U8(13),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(5), U8(14),
B(Star), R(11),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(9), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(11),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(20),
B(LdaConstant), U8(6),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(20), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(20),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(11), R(21),
B(Mov), R(6), R(22),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(21), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(20),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(11), R(20),
B(Mov), R(6), R(21),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(20), U8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(12), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(12), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(19),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[ignition] Use jump for single deferred commands For a single deferred commands, using a jump table is overkill, so instead simply test the token against the single entry. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I0300f640080705fb10f46ad4ed5791703fa4dd77 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506153 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45393}
2017-05-16 16:38:52 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(17),
[interpreter] Avoid redundant {PopContext} instructions. This avoids emitting redundant {PopContext} bytecode instructions when non-local control-flow leaves the method body. It also folds multiple such {PopContext} instructions into one, in case several scoping levels are crossed at one. Only the expected context of the target of a local control-flow transfer matters. R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TEST=debugger/regress/regress-crbug-724858 BUG=chromium:724858 Change-Id: Id4a47ae9fea25e75ae1af13619720b16a3975edf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/512545 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45507}
2017-05-24 08:08:21 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(18),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(56),
B(Jump), U8(40),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(17), U8(7),
B(Star), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(16),
B(PushContext), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaFalse),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(20),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(18),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_RejectPromise), R(18), U8(3),
B(PopContext), R(17),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(14),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(8),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(15),
[inspector] reworked async stack instrumentation for async functions New intstrumentation consists of: - kAsyncFunctionSuspended when async function is suspended on await (called on each await), - kAsyncFunctionFinished when async function is finished. Old instrumentation was based on reusing async function promise. Using this promise produces couple side effects: - for any promise instrumentation we first need to check if it is special case for async function promise or not - it requires expensive reading from promise object. - we capture stack for async functions even if it does not contain awaits. - we do not properly cancel async task created for async function. New intsrumntation resolved all these problems as well as provide clear mapping between async task and generator which we can use later to fetch scope information for async functions on pause. R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org Bug: v8:7078 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ifdcec947d91e6e3d4d5f9029bc080a19b8e23d41 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1043096 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53445}
2018-05-30 14:21:39 +00:00
B(LdaFalse),
B(Star), R(17),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(16),
[inspector] reworked async stack instrumentation for async functions New intstrumentation consists of: - kAsyncFunctionSuspended when async function is suspended on await (called on each await), - kAsyncFunctionFinished when async function is finished. Old instrumentation was based on reusing async function promise. Using this promise produces couple side effects: - for any promise instrumentation we first need to check if it is special case for async function promise or not - it requires expensive reading from promise object. - we capture stack for async functions even if it does not contain awaits. - we do not properly cancel async task created for async function. New intsrumntation resolved all these problems as well as provide clear mapping between async task and generator which we can use later to fetch scope information for async functions on pause. R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org Bug: v8:7078 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ifdcec947d91e6e3d4d5f9029bc080a19b8e23d41 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1043096 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53445}
2018-05-30 14:21:39 +00:00
B(CallJSRuntime), U8(%async_function_promise_release), R(16), U8(2),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(13),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(8), U8(3), I8(0),
B(Jump), U8(21),
B(Mov), R(0), R(16),
B(Mov), R(14), R(17),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_ResolvePromise), R(16), U8(2),
B(Ldar), R(0),
/* 60 S> */ B(Return),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 60 S> */ B(Return),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 60 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[ignition] Use jump table for "finally" deferred commands Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I5d245ea485c93fcc03fcd95c82ae0474f31ffa5e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/505491 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45341}
2017-05-16 11:36:04 +00:00
Smi [6],
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
Smi [19],
Smi [22],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
handlers: [
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
[10, 307, 315],
[13, 267, 269],
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
[19, 137, 145],
[22, 100, 102],
[205, 215, 217],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
---
snippet: "
async function f(arr) {
for (let x of arr) await x;
}
f([1, 2, 3]);
"
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
frame size: 23
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
parameter count: 2
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
bytecode array length: 418
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
bytecodes: [
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(SwitchOnGeneratorState), R(3), U8(0), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(closure), R(12),
B(Mov), R(this), R(13),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_CreateJSGeneratorObject), R(12), U8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[ignition] Move generator object creation to BytecodeGenerator This lets us avoid allocating the "this" variable for every generator, since the BytecodeGenerator can directly read the receiver via BytecodeArrayBuilder::Receive() when passing it into %_CreateJSGeneratorObject. Bug: v8:6351 Change-Id: Ib5e1f3303b6b5d5fc051ce76ea62129fd6afac65 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/500507 Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45281}
2017-05-12 17:29:53 +00:00
/* 16 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[Interpreter] Make CallJSRuntime implicitly use undefined reciever. JS runtime calls are always created with undefined recievers, so make the bytecode behave similarly to CallUndefinedReciever such that we don't need to push an explicit undefined register for the receiver for such calls. Modifies the Async[Generator/Function]Await[Caught/Uncaught] runtime calls to pass the generator in the first argument rather than the reciever since these runtime calls were desugered in the bytecode generator and explicitly passed the generator in the receiver. Change-Id: I36c8087bb3b663dccd805bfdb1eea04eb6a73269 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/654257 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47870}
2017-09-06 22:48:36 +00:00
B(CallJSRuntime), U8(%async_function_promise_create), R(0), U8(0),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(0),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(14),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(18),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(19),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
/* 40 S> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(arg0), U8(1), U8(0),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallProperty0), R(21), R(arg0), U8(2),
B(Mov), R(arg0), R(20),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfJSReceiver), U8(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowSymbolIteratorInvalid), R(0), U8(0),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
/* 40 E> */ B(LdaNamedProperty), R(5), U8(2), U8(4),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
/* 35 S> */ B(CallProperty0), R(6), R(5), U8(6),
B(Star), R(7),
/* 35 E> */ B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(7), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(7),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(7), U8(1),
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(3), U8(8),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanTrue), U8(63),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(7), U8(4), U8(10),
B(Star), R(9),
Revert "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" This reverts commit bf4cc9ee154f15942594016777f77d3208230f5f. Reason for revert: Breaks windows with msvc and linux with gcc https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/841 https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/17265 Original change's description: > [esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration > > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the > september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method > to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during > each iteration step. > > This impacts: > > - yield* > - for-of loops > - spread arguments > - array spreads > > In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of > these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, > which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a > followup patch). > > This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used > as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, > without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several > AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. > > BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 > R=​rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ib81106a0182687fc5efea0bc32302ad06376773b > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/687997 > Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50452} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,caitp@igalia.com,caitp@chromium.org Change-Id: I1797c0d596dfd6850d6f0f505f591a7a990dd1f1 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:6861, v8:5699 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857616 Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50454}
2018-01-09 16:50:16 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
B(Mov), R(9), R(4),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 26 E> */ B(StackCheck),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(4), R(1),
/* 45 S> */ B(Mov), R(3), R(20),
B(Mov), R(1), R(21),
B(Mov), R(0), R(22),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallJSRuntime), U8(%async_function_await_uncaught), R(20), U8(3),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
/* 45 E> */ B(SuspendGenerator), R(3), R(0), U8(20), U8(0),
B(ResumeGenerator), R(3), R(0), U8(20),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(20),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_GeneratorGetResumeMode), R(3), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
[inspector] removed break location right before suspension in async function In current implementation in expressions like await foo() we have break location right after foo call and before actual await. And we additionally have a lot of other statement locations because of do scope. Let's move async debugging closer to sync debugging and introduce only one break location for await - before awaited function call. Bug: v8:6425,v8:6162 Change-Id: I7568767856022c49101e7f3b7e39a2e401d21644 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/514046 Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45625}
2017-05-31 11:40:31 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(21),
[async-await] desugar Await in BytecodeGenerator This includes several changes. From most to least interesting: - No longer implement AwaitExpressions using a do-expression. - Reduces frame-size of async generators by not allocating temporary variables to hold results of Await epxressions. - Streamline and reduce generated bytecodes for Await. - Debugger no longer emits a debug::kCallBreakLocation breakpoint for the JS-builtin call performed for Await, and instead only emits such a breakpoint if the operand of Await is actually a call. - Push fewer parameters to Await* builtins, using the receiver for the first parameter (possible now that the CallRuntime invocation not part of the AST). - Adds a new Await AST node. No new members or anything, but it seemed palatable to avoid having `if (is_await())` in a number of VisitSuspend functions. BUG=v8:5855, v8:5099, v8:4483 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org Change-Id: I9cd3fda99cd40295c04fdf1aea01b5d83fac6caf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558806 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46666}
2017-07-13 13:53:13 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(5),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(20),
Reland "[async-iteration] implement spec-change to `yield` in async generators" Per https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-iteration/pull/102/files: AsyncGeneratorResolve no longer unwraps a value component. Instead, the value is unwrapped before the builtin call via Await, allowing Promise rejections to affect the generator control flow. Thus, all `yield <expr>` implicitly become `yield await <expr>`. Additionally, `return <expr>` becomes `return await <expr>`. Finally, when the generator is resumed with `.return()`, the parameter passed to .return() is awaited before generator execution properly continues). BUG=v8:6187, v8:5855 R=littledan@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Id7718028fd555481f9f4ca0dbecfa788e3057c48 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/594500 Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47058}
2017-08-01 14:45:03 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(JumpLoop), U8(82), I8(0),
Remove the catch variable name from the extension field of catch contexts Instead rely on the scope info containing the name as well. Change-Id: Ie1f96ea023a793b11209510566f6831b1dfd40ab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042567 Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52983}
2018-05-04 09:29:20 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(37),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(20),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(20), U8(5),
B(Star), R(19),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(19),
B(PushContext), R(20),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(12),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(8),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(21),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kReThrow), R(21), U8(1),
B(PopContext), R(20),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[async-await] desugar Await in BytecodeGenerator This includes several changes. From most to least interesting: - No longer implement AwaitExpressions using a do-expression. - Reduces frame-size of async generators by not allocating temporary variables to hold results of Await epxressions. - Streamline and reduce generated bytecodes for Await. - Debugger no longer emits a debug::kCallBreakLocation breakpoint for the JS-builtin call performed for Await, and instead only emits such a breakpoint if the operand of Await is actually a call. - Push fewer parameters to Await* builtins, using the receiver for the first parameter (possible now that the CallRuntime invocation not part of the AST). - Adds a new Await AST node. No new members or anything, but it seemed palatable to avoid having `if (is_await())` in a number of VisitSuspend functions. BUG=v8:5855, v8:5099, v8:4483 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org Change-Id: I9cd3fda99cd40295c04fdf1aea01b5d83fac6caf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558806 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46666}
2017-07-13 13:53:13 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(17),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
B(Star), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(13),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(90),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(LdaNamedProperty), R(5), U8(6), U8(14),
B(Star), R(10),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(TestUndetectable),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(79),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(TestEqualStrict), R(8), U8(16),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(47),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(10),
[bigint] Fix typeof. The bytecode generator has special handling for comparing the result of the typeof operator against a string literal. This needs to be adapted for bigints. R=jkummerow@chromium.org, mythrie@chromium.org Bug: v8:6791 Change-Id: I42d6c9e9225ce05e19393f10e01ae496ecb70c9c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/753465 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49172}
2017-11-07 09:26:56 +00:00
B(TestTypeOf), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(4),
B(Jump), U8(18),
Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." This is a reland of 1c48d52bb1ee9bb28e146c60eda08cd4afaa5745. It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where actually "undefined" elements should appear. This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads (IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path. It also includes tests for such situations. Original change's description: > [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. > > This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a]. > If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode > [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable > is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial > array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to > clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array. > > The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored > into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit > from this optimization also. > For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin. > > The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better > than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice. > > Bug: v8:7980 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng > Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024 > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520} Bug: v8:7980 Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882 Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
2018-09-05 07:50:48 +00:00
B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(154),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
B(LdaConstant), U8(7),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(20),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kNewTypeError), R(19), U8(2),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(Throw),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Mov), R(context), R(19),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(10), R(20),
B(Mov), R(5), R(21),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(20), U8(2),
[ESNext] Implement optional catch binding This is just a rebased version of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/571453 with no functional changes Bug: v8:6889 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: Ia082cc09ca527505b288ac88e68e0b74eae94765 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849423 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50417}
2018-01-04 19:15:04 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(6),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(19),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(27),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(10), R(19),
B(Mov), R(5), R(20),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_Call), R(19), U8(2),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Star), R(11),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_IsJSReceiver), R(11), U8(1),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(JumpIfToBooleanFalse), U8(4),
Make non-Module generators only context allocate parameters. In particular, local variables should be allocated on stack (in bytecode register), and stored/loaded to the generator object on generator suspend/resume. The CL is based on @adamk's change to scoping/parsers (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/498538/), I only made the debugger cope with this change. I should note that the CL changes the scope type of suspended generators from ScopeType.Closure to ScopeType.Local. In the future we might want to introduce ScopeType.SuspendedGenerator to make the distinction explicit. Some of the changes in the tests have been made because the debugger functions do not return scopes of closed generators anymore. Generators should be allowed to throw away their internal state when they finish. BUG=v8:6368 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2898163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45515}
2017-05-24 13:54:57 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(7),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kThrowIteratorResultNotAnObject), R(11), U8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(18),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(TestReferenceEqual), R(16),
[async-await] desugar Await in BytecodeGenerator This includes several changes. From most to least interesting: - No longer implement AwaitExpressions using a do-expression. - Reduces frame-size of async generators by not allocating temporary variables to hold results of Await epxressions. - Streamline and reduce generated bytecodes for Await. - Debugger no longer emits a debug::kCallBreakLocation breakpoint for the JS-builtin call performed for Await, and instead only emits such a breakpoint if the operand of Await is actually a call. - Push fewer parameters to Await* builtins, using the receiver for the first parameter (possible now that the CallRuntime invocation not part of the AST). - Adds a new Await AST node. No new members or anything, but it seemed palatable to avoid having `if (is_await())` in a number of VisitSuspend functions. BUG=v8:5855, v8:5099, v8:4483 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org Change-Id: I9cd3fda99cd40295c04fdf1aea01b5d83fac6caf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558806 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46666}
2017-07-13 13:53:13 +00:00
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(17),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[ignition] Re-use deferred return/rethrow commands Since deferred return/async return/rethrow commands don't have an associated statement, we can reuse their entries in the deferred command list. Bug: v8:4280 Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: Ic51fb735d4ea13ebea1d5e456ec5689c0d98a4ac Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506077 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45344}
2017-05-16 15:20:09 +00:00
B(LdaZero),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(56),
B(Jump), U8(40),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(16),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(CreateCatchContext), R(16), U8(8),
B(Star), R(15),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(15),
B(PushContext), R(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaImmutableCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(18),
Reland "[esnext] load `iterator.next` only once at beginning of iteration" https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/988 gained concensus during the september 2017 TC39 meetings. This moves the load of the "next" method to the very beginning of the iteration protocol, rather than during each iteration step. This impacts: - yield* - for-of loops - spread arguments - array spreads In the v8 implementation, this also affects async iteration versions of these things (the sole exception being the Async-From-Sync iterator, which requires a few more changes to work with this, likely done in a followup patch). This change introduces a new AST node, ResolvedProperty, which can be used as a callee by Call nodes to produce the same bytecode as Property calls, without observably re-loading the property. This is used in several AST-desugarings involving the iteration protocol. BUG=v8:6861, v8:5699 R=rmcilroy@chromium.org TBR=neis@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Change-Id: I9685db6e85315ba8a2df87a4537c2bf491e1e35b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/857593 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50518}
2018-01-11 17:24:11 +00:00
B(LdaFalse),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(19),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(17),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_RejectPromise), R(17), U8(3),
B(PopContext), R(16),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(1),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(13),
[ignition] Always write the deferred command result register For deferred commands (such as in try-finally), some deferred commands save and restore the accumulator using a result register (e.g. return, throw, rethrow), while others don't (e.g. break, continue, fall-through). However, conditionally reading this result register that may not ever be written caused it to be considered live from the start of the function, as far as the liveness analysis could statically tell. Now, we write the result register for all deferred commands, including the fall-through. As a micro-optimization, we re-use the Smi command tokeen to clobber the result, rather than emitting an LdaUndefined. Bug: chromium:758472 Change-Id: I2ea65e2249b40ee6403216e654a8bb88d50bec3b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635592 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47612}
2017-08-25 16:04:42 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(16),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(-1),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
This is a first step towards reducing the number of stores/loads when suspending/resuming a generator. Unfortunately, even for an empty generator, we still use 8 register for various things (try-finally, copies of generator object, parser-introduced temporaries). I will try to get rid of these in separate CLs. Changes: - SuspendGenerator bytecode now takes register list to save. - ResumeGenerator was split into two bytecodes: * Resume generator reads the state out and marks the generator as 'executing'. * RestoreGeneratorRegisters reloads the registers from the generator. + this required adding support for output register list. - Introduced generator_object_ register in the bytecode generator. * in subsequent CLs, I will make better use of it, the goal is to get rid if the .generator_object local variable. - Taught register optimizer to flush unassigned registers. BUG=v8:6379 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2894293003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45675}
2017-06-02 11:55:48 +00:00
B(Jump), U8(8),
[ignition] Single-switch generator bytecode Currently, yields and awaits inside loops compile to bytecode which switches to the top of the loop header, and switch again once inside the loop. This is to make loops reducible. This replaces this switching logic with a single switch bytecode that directly jumps to the bytecode being resumed. Among other things, this allows us to no longer maintain the generator state after the switch at the top of the function, and avoid having to track loop suspend counts. TurboFan still needs to have reducible loops, so we now insert loop header switches during bytecode graph building, for suspends that are discovered to be inside loops during bytecode analysis. We do, however, do some environment magic across loop headers since we know that we will continue switching if and only if we reached that loop header via a generator resume. This allows us to generate fewer phis and tighten liveness. Change-Id: Id2720ce1d6955be9a48178322cc209b3a4b8d385 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/866734 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50804}
2018-01-23 13:51:38 +00:00
B(Star), R(13),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(LdaSmi), I8(2),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(12),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Star), R(14),
[inspector] reworked async stack instrumentation for async functions New intstrumentation consists of: - kAsyncFunctionSuspended when async function is suspended on await (called on each await), - kAsyncFunctionFinished when async function is finished. Old instrumentation was based on reusing async function promise. Using this promise produces couple side effects: - for any promise instrumentation we first need to check if it is special case for async function promise or not - it requires expensive reading from promise object. - we capture stack for async functions even if it does not contain awaits. - we do not properly cancel async task created for async function. New intsrumntation resolved all these problems as well as provide clear mapping between async task and generator which we can use later to fetch scope information for async functions on pause. R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org Bug: v8:7078 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ifdcec947d91e6e3d4d5f9029bc080a19b8e23d41 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1043096 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53445}
2018-05-30 14:21:39 +00:00
B(LdaTrue),
B(Star), R(16),
[async] First prototype of zero-cost async stack traces. This introduces a new flag --async-stack-traces, which enables zero-cost async stack traces. This enriches the non-standard Error.stack property with async stack frames computed from walking up the promise chains and collecting all the await suspension points along the way. In Error.stack these async frames are marked with "async" to make it possible to distinguish them from regular frames, for example: ``` Error: Some error message at bar (<anonymous>) at async foo (<anonymous>) ``` It's zero-cost because no additional information is collected during the execution of the program, but only the information already present in the promise chains is used to reconstruct an approximation of the async stack in case of an exception. But this approximation is limited to suspension points at await's in async functions. This depends on a recent ECMAScript specification change, flagged behind --harmony-await-optimization and implied the --async-stack-traces flag. Without this change there's no way to get from the outer promise of an async function to the rest of the promise chain, since the link is broken by the indirection introduced by await. For async functions the special outer promise, named .promise in the Parser desugaring, is now forcible allocated to stack slot 0 during scope resolution, to make it accessible to the stack frame construction logic. Note that this first prototype doesn't yet work fully support async generators and might have other limitations. Bug: v8:7522 Ref: nodejs/node#11865 Change-Id: I0cc8e3cdfe45dab56d3d506be2d25907409b01a9 Design-Document: http://bit.ly/v8-zero-cost-async-stack-traces Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1256762 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56363}
2018-10-04 07:19:45 +00:00
B(Mov), R(0), R(15),
[inspector] reworked async stack instrumentation for async functions New intstrumentation consists of: - kAsyncFunctionSuspended when async function is suspended on await (called on each await), - kAsyncFunctionFinished when async function is finished. Old instrumentation was based on reusing async function promise. Using this promise produces couple side effects: - for any promise instrumentation we first need to check if it is special case for async function promise or not - it requires expensive reading from promise object. - we capture stack for async functions even if it does not contain awaits. - we do not properly cancel async task created for async function. New intsrumntation resolved all these problems as well as provide clear mapping between async task and generator which we can use later to fetch scope information for async functions on pause. R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org Bug: v8:7078 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Ifdcec947d91e6e3d4d5f9029bc080a19b8e23d41 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1043096 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53445}
2018-05-30 14:21:39 +00:00
B(CallJSRuntime), U8(%async_function_promise_release), R(15), U8(2),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(14),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(SetPendingMessage),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(12),
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
B(SwitchOnSmiNoFeedback), U8(9), U8(3), I8(0),
B(Jump), U8(21),
B(Mov), R(0), R(15),
B(Mov), R(13), R(16),
B(InvokeIntrinsic), U8(Runtime::k_ResolvePromise), R(15), U8(2),
B(Ldar), R(0),
/* 54 S> */ B(Return),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
/* 54 S> */ B(Return),
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(13),
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
B(ReThrow),
B(LdaUndefined),
/* 54 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
Smi [125],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
SYMBOL_TYPE,
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["next"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["done"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["value"],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["return"],
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE [""],
[runtime] Add SCOPE_INFO_TYPE InstanceType Bug: v8:7310 Change-Id: I82e7ada4c0f7e415887a859719eb01bb45fd3012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/921742 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51324}
2018-02-16 12:36:47 +00:00
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
[ignition] Use jump table for "finally" deferred commands Bug: v8:6218 Change-Id: I5d245ea485c93fcc03fcd95c82ae0474f31ffa5e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/505491 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45341}
2017-05-16 11:36:04 +00:00
Smi [6],
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
Smi [19],
Smi [22],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
handlers: [
[es2018] Consistently use AsyncReturnStatement in async functions. The Parser desugaring didn't use the AsyncReturnStatement consistently to return from async functions (aka resolve the .promise with the return value and return the .promise from the async function). Instead the Parser essentially had a copy of the BytecodeGenerator functionality. This change unifies the handling of returns from async functions. Bug: v8:7522, v8:8238 Change-Id: Ib00a60aee30d541b84835d9cc83e9937b7a39e26 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1269036 Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56453}
2018-10-08 17:57:52 +00:00
[26, 358, 366],
[29, 318, 320],
[generators] Store parameters in the generator object. Currently, we context allocate all parameters for generators. With this CL, we keep arguments on stack (unless they escape to inner closure) and copy them between the stack and the generator's register file on suspend/resume. This will save context allocation in most cases. Note: There is an asymmetry between suspend and resume. - Suspend copies arguments and registers to the generator. - Resume copies only the registers from the generator, the arguments are copied by the ResumeGenerator trampoline. Bug: v8:5164 Change-Id: I6333898c60abf461b1ab1b5c6d3dc7188fa95649 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1063712 Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53327}
2018-05-24 09:29:53 +00:00
[35, 188, 196],
[38, 151, 153],
[256, 266, 268],
[parser] avoid complex for-loop desugaring when possible let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline performance of for-loops with let variables. This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger, similar to other stack-allocated vars. BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460 R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247 Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
2017-04-18 14:56:06 +00:00
]
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink