AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
8f68e39214
v8/test/inspector/debugger/wasm-stepping-liftoff-expected.txt

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

48 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
Tests stepping through wasm scripts by byte offsets
Setting up global instance variable.
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Got wasm script: wasm://wasm/42af3c82
Setting breakpoint on offset 72 (should be propagated to 73, the offset of the call), url wasm://wasm/42af3c82
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
{
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
columnNumber : 73
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
lineNumber : 0
scriptId : <scriptId>
}
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:73
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
Debugger.stepOver called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:75
[liftoff] Allow resuming execution after stepping R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia082b842de8947ead3931943b3bc05903a0f9e29 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101002 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66704}
2020-03-13 11:51:04 +00:00
Debugger.resume called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:73
[liftoff] Allow resuming execution after stepping R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia082b842de8947ead3931943b3bc05903a0f9e29 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101002 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66704}
2020-03-13 11:51:04 +00:00
Debugger.stepOver called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:75
[wasm] Fix OSR on wasm calls This fixes issues with replacing the return address of deeper (non-top) wasm frames, i.e. frames which are at a call position. The replaced address should also point after the call in the new code, so we don't execute the same call again. This is achieved by using slightly different encodings for breakpoint positions and other (wasm instruction) positions. Breakpoints set {is_instruction} to {false} in the source position table entry, whereas usual wasm instruction set it to {true}. Also, during stack walking for OSR, we remember whether we want to OSR to the position before the instruction (if it's the top frame), or after the call instruction (if it's deeper in the stack). We then use the {is_instruction} predicate to find the right location. R=thibaudm@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: I73212a7532c6ecf4c82bde76fe4059c8203e422c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116206 Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66850}
2020-03-24 15:43:42 +00:00
Debugger.stepInto called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:59
[liftoff] Allow resuming execution after stepping R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia082b842de8947ead3931943b3bc05903a0f9e29 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101002 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66704}
2020-03-13 11:51:04 +00:00
Debugger.resume called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:73
[liftoff][debug] Implement StepIn Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last step action was anything other than StepNext. In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for StepOver at a return location. When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test. R=thibaudm@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035 Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
2020-03-19 10:40:47 +00:00
Debugger.stepInto called
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:52
[liftoff] Allow resuming execution after stepping R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia082b842de8947ead3931943b3bc05903a0f9e29 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101002 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66704}
2020-03-13 11:51:04 +00:00
Debugger.stepOver called
[liftoff][debug] Implement StepIn Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last step action was anything other than StepNext. In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for StepOver at a return location. When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test. R=thibaudm@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035 Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
2020-03-19 10:40:47 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:53
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
Debugger.stepOver called
[liftoff][debug] Implement StepIn Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last step action was anything other than StepNext. In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for StepOver at a return location. When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test. R=thibaudm@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035 Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
2020-03-19 10:40:47 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:54
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
Debugger.stepOver called
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:73
[liftoff][debug] Implement StepIn Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last step action was anything other than StepNext. In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for StepOver at a return location. When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test. R=thibaudm@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035 Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
2020-03-19 10:40:47 +00:00
Debugger.resume called
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:52
Debugger.resume called
Paused at :0:24
[liftoff] Allow resuming execution after stepping R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia082b842de8947ead3931943b3bc05903a0f9e29 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101002 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66704}
2020-03-13 11:51:04 +00:00
Debugger.resume called
exports.main returned!
[liftoff] Test stepping over a recursive call And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as expected this seems to work out of the box. R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206 Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
2020-03-17 17:25:36 +00:00
Test stepping over a recursive call
Setting breakpoint on the recursive call instruction @+93, url wasm://wasm/42af3c82
{
columnNumber : 93
lineNumber : 0
scriptId : <scriptId>
}
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:93
Removing breakpoint
Debugger.stepOver called
Paused at wasm://wasm/42af3c82:0:95
Debugger.resume called
[liftoff] Add initial logic for stepping Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a basic step over functionality. We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a return instruction). R=clemensb@chromium.org Bug: v8:10321 Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732 Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
2020-03-12 16:39:26 +00:00
Finished!
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink