AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
d4e11355ee
v8/test/cctest/interpreter/bytecode_expectations/PrivateMethodDeclaration.golden

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

193 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
#
# Autogenerated by generate-bytecode-expectations.
#
---
wrap: yes
private methods: yes
---
snippet: "
{
class A {
#a() { return 1; }
}
}
"
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
frame size: 7
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
parameter count: 1
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
bytecode array length: 52
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(0),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(1),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(2),
B(Star), R(3),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kCreatePrivateNameSymbol), R(3), U8(1),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
B(CreateClosure), U8(3), U8(0), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(2),
[class] implement access of private methods This patch implements the access of private methods: - When building property loads, check whether it requires a brand check. If so, build the brand check and load the property (the method) from the context instead. - Throw type errors when there is an attempted write to private methods. Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Ic917d2a0030196c1940b0c0ba65a340af736c769 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1610383 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62292}
2019-06-19 09:59:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(1),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(2), R(5),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kDefineClass), R(4), U8(3),
B(Star), R(4),
B(CreateClosure), U8(4), U8(1), U8(2),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(3),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PopContext), R(1),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(5), R(0),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
B(LdaUndefined),
[class] implement private accessors This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind of private accessor access more specific. Bug: v8:8330 Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
2019-08-30 01:09:00 +00:00
/* 77 S> */ B(Return),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
]
constant pool: [
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
FIXED_ARRAY_TYPE,
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["A"],
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
{
class D {
[class] implement access of private methods This patch implements the access of private methods: - When building property loads, check whether it requires a brand check. If so, build the brand check and load the property (the method) from the context instead. - Throw type errors when there is an attempted write to private methods. Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Ic917d2a0030196c1940b0c0ba65a340af736c769 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1610383 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62292}
2019-06-19 09:59:28 +00:00
#d() { return 1; }
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
}
class E extends D {
[class] implement access of private methods This patch implements the access of private methods: - When building property loads, check whether it requires a brand check. If so, build the brand check and load the property (the method) from the context instead. - Throw type errors when there is an attempted write to private methods. Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Ic917d2a0030196c1940b0c0ba65a340af736c769 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1610383 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62292}
2019-06-19 09:59:28 +00:00
#e() { return 2; }
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
}
}
"
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
frame size: 8
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
parameter count: 1
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
bytecode array length: 101
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(0),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(2),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(2),
B(Star), R(4),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kCreatePrivateNameSymbol), R(4), U8(1),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
B(CreateClosure), U8(3), U8(0), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[class] implement access of private methods This patch implements the access of private methods: - When building property loads, check whether it requires a brand check. If so, build the brand check and load the property (the method) from the context instead. - Throw type errors when there is an attempted write to private methods. Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Ic917d2a0030196c1940b0c0ba65a340af736c769 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1610383 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62292}
2019-06-19 09:59:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(1),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(3), R(6),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kDefineClass), R(5), U8(3),
B(Star), R(5),
B(CreateClosure), U8(4), U8(1), U8(2),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(3),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PopContext), R(2),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(6), R(0),
[class] implement private accessors This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind of private accessor access more specific. Bug: v8:8330 Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
2019-08-30 01:09:00 +00:00
/* 38 E> */ B(CreateBlockContext), U8(5),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(2),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(7),
B(Star), R(4),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kCreatePrivateNameSymbol), R(4), U8(1),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
/* 93 E> */ B(CreateClosure), U8(8), U8(2), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[class] implement private accessors This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind of private accessor access more specific. Bug: v8:8330 Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
2019-08-30 01:09:00 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(6),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(3), R(6),
B(Mov), R(0), R(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kDefineClass), R(5), U8(3),
B(Star), R(5),
B(CreateClosure), U8(9), U8(3), U8(2),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(3),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PopContext), R(2),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(6), R(1),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
B(LdaUndefined),
[class] implement private accessors This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind of private accessor access more specific. Bug: v8:8330 Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
2019-08-30 01:09:00 +00:00
/* 126 S> */ B(Return),
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
]
constant pool: [
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
FIXED_ARRAY_TYPE,
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["D"],
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
FIXED_ARRAY_TYPE,
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["E"],
Reland "[class] implement private method declarations" Added null check when printing the brand with --print-ast. Bug: chromium:961507, chromium:961508 Original change's description: > [class] implement private method declarations > > This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access > of private methods would be left to a future patch. > When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now: > > - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the > context. > - Create the closures for the private methods > - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the > constructor. > > Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit# > > Bug: v8:8330 > Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708 > Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387} Change-Id: I3bf465f70c27914c9ec19f3f59ae018b28c9a866 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605521 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61459}
2019-05-13 19:39:54 +00:00
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
]
handlers: [
]
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
---
snippet: "
{
class A { foo() {} }
class C extends A {
#m() { return super.foo; }
}
}
"
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
frame size: 8
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
parameter count: 1
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
bytecode array length: 98
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
B(CreateBlockContext), U8(0),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(2),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(LdaTheHole),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(CreateClosure), U8(2), U8(0), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(1),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(4),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(CreateClosure), U8(3), U8(1), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(7),
B(Mov), R(3), R(5),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kDefineClass), R(4), U8(4),
B(Star), R(4),
B(PopContext), R(2),
B(Mov), R(5), R(0),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
/* 38 E> */ B(CreateBlockContext), U8(4),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(PushContext), R(2),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(6),
B(Star), R(4),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kCreatePrivateNameSymbol), R(4), U8(1),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(4),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
/* 77 E> */ B(CreateClosure), U8(7), U8(2), U8(2),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(3),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(LdaConstant), U8(5),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(5),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Mov), R(3), R(6),
B(Mov), R(0), R(7),
B(CallRuntime), U16(Runtime::kDefineClass), R(5), U8(3),
B(Star), R(5),
B(CreateClosure), U8(8), U8(3), U8(2),
Revert "Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects""" This reverts commit 392a1217dea6374314c496d09ccecfc7e9fc19fc. Reason for revert: Several failures on mac64 gc stress: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/9747 Original change's description: > Reland "Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects"" > > This is a reland of c48096d44243c20842dd0e48d50b00bafe18ff93 > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects" > > > > This is a reland of c07c02e1c48d7039b2b6eb758bca4588dc372654 > > > > Original change's description: > > > [runtime] Remove extension slots from context objects > > > > > > Context objects have an extension slot, which contains further > > > additional data that depends on the type of the context. > > > > > > This CL removes the extension slot from contexts that don't need > > > them, hence reducing memory. > > > > > > The following contexts will still have an extension slot: native, > > > module, await, block and with contexts. See objects/contexts.h for > > > what the slot is used for. > > > The following contexts will not have an extension slot anymore (they > > > were not used before): script, catch and builtin contexts. > > > Eval and function contexts only have the extension slot if they > > > contain a sloppy eval. > > > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > > Change-Id: I8ca56c22fa02437bbac392ea72174ebfca80e030 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863191 > > > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64372} > > > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > > > Bug: v8:9744 > > Change-Id: I0749cc2d8f59940c25841736634a70047116d647 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1869192 > > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > > Auto-Submit: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64380} > > TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org > > Bug: v8:9744 > Change-Id: I621ffe98722f8c4defaf277b8d1666484ba2963f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872400 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64451} TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,victorgomes@google.com Change-Id: I99a71180c6a00a87478867a8210ff9ceb46cb3ee No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9744 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1872405 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64453}
2019-10-22 09:47:12 +00:00
B(StaCurrentContextSlot), U8(3),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(Star), R(6),
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
B(Ldar), R(5),
[class] implement static private methods This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and implements static private methods: - The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used. Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference through the class scope. - Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-) allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval, it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing it by name in inner scopes. - Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to static private methods through eval results in forced context allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info. - Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to access to static private methods now save a ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved, we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse data flags to remember declaring it. Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
2019-10-10 14:33:02 +00:00
B(StaNamedProperty), R(6), U8(9), U8(0),
B(PopContext), R(2),
B(Mov), R(3), R(1),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
B(LdaUndefined),
[class] implement private accessors This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind of private accessor access more specific. Bug: v8:8330 Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
2019-08-30 01:09:00 +00:00
/* 118 S> */ B(Return),
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
]
constant pool: [
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
FIXED_ARRAY_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SCOPE_INFO_TYPE,
FIXED_ARRAY_TYPE,
[class] fix undefined private name access in computed property keys This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
2019-10-10 19:00:28 +00:00
ONE_BYTE_INTERNALIZED_STRING_TYPE ["C"],
[class] fix super access in private methods This patch stores the home objects in private methods that access super properties. Bug: v8:8330 Change-Id: I2507fda0bd70183f02d162ec50a5be76c248f0ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724900 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63113}
2019-08-07 05:14:45 +00:00
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SHARED_FUNCTION_INFO_TYPE,
SYMBOL_TYPE,
]
handlers: [
]
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink