AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
d58f40b63b
v8/test/inspector/debugger/promise-chain-when-limit-hit-expected.txt

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

549 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[inspector] Refactor protocol-test.js This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and gives full control over what's happening to the test code. It also forces description for every test. BUG=none Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
2017-05-19 00:35:45 +00:00
Tests how async promise chains behave when reaching the limit of stacks
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
Checks correctness of promise chains when limit hit
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(3)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(4)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
parent : {
callFrames : [
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(5)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
parent : {
callFrames : [
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(6)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
parent : {
callFrames : [
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(7)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
parent : {
callFrames : [
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
inspector.setMaxAsyncTaskStacks(8)
Run expression 'console.trace()' with async chain len: 3
{
method : Runtime.consoleAPICalled
params : {
args : [
[0] : {
type : string
value : console.trace
}
]
executionContextId : <executionContextId>
stackTrace : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 14
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 2
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
parent : {
callFrames : [
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
[0] : {
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved. For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/e118462f18a862df81a04486e13dd62997cbfc5a Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
]
[inspector] reworked async instrumentation for promises Old instrumentation was designed to collect promise creation stack and promise scheduled stack together. In DevTools for last 6 months we show only creation stack for promises. We got strong support from users for new model. Now we can drop support for scheduled stacks and simplify implementation. New promise instrumentation is straightforward: - we send kDebugPromiseThen when promise is created by .then call, - we send kDebugPromiseCatch when promise is created by .catch call, - we send kDebugWillHandle before chained callback and kDebugDidHandle after chained callback, - and we send separate kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated for internal promise inside async await function. Advantages: - we reduce amount of captured stacks (we do not capture stack for promise that constructed not by .then or .catch), - we can consider async task related to .then and .catch as one shot since chained callback is executed once, - on V8 side we can implement required instrumentation using only promise hooks, Disadvantage: - see await-promise test, sometimes scheduled stack was useful since we add catch handler in native code, Implementation details: - on kInit promise hook we need to figure out why promise was created. We analyze builtin functions until first user defined function on current stack. If there is kAsyncFunctionPromiseCreate function then we send kDebugAsyncFunctionPromiseCreated event. If there is kPromiseThen or kPromiseCatch then only if this function is bottom builtin function we send corresponded event to inspector. We need it because Promise.all internally calls .then and in this case we have Promise.all and Promise.then on stack at the same time and we do not need to report this internally created promise to inspector. Bug: chromium:778796 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: I53f47ce8c5c4a9897655c3396c249ea59529ae47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/765208 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49553}
2017-11-21 15:42:43 +00:00
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 33
functionName : Promise.resolve.then
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
parent : {
callFrames : [
[0] : {
columnNumber : 22
functionName : asyncCall
lineNumber : 5
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
[1] : {
columnNumber : 4
functionName :
lineNumber : 6
scriptId : <scriptId>
url :
}
]
description : Promise.then
}
}
[inspector] better stacks for promises - we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack, - we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent. Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation: 1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1 2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2 3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3 4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4 5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled 6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6 7) finished #2 8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled 9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7 10) finished #3 If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected. If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet. BUG=v8:6189 R=dgozman@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00
}
}
timestamp : <timestamp>
type : trace
}
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink