Revert "Partial revert of r21901"
This reverts r21927. Reason: broke the build. BUG= TBR=jochen@chromium.org, bmeurer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/347423002 git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21928 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This commit is contained in:
parent
2880181fb8
commit
5ef3f06029
@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ namespace base {
|
|||||||
// default values should hopefully be pretty safe.
|
// default values should hopefully be pretty safe.
|
||||||
struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures = {
|
struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures = {
|
||||||
false, // bug can't exist before process spawns multiple threads
|
false, // bug can't exist before process spawns multiple threads
|
||||||
false, // no SSE2
|
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
} } // namespace v8::base
|
} } // namespace v8::base
|
||||||
@ -88,11 +87,6 @@ void AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeaturesInit() {
|
|||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures.has_amd_lock_mb_bug = false;
|
AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures.has_amd_lock_mb_bug = false;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if !defined(__SSE2__)
|
|
||||||
// edx bit 26 is SSE2 which we use to tell use whether we can use mfence
|
|
||||||
AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures.has_sse2 = ((edx >> 26) & 1);
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class AtomicOpsx86Initializer {
|
class AtomicOpsx86Initializer {
|
||||||
|
@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ namespace base {
|
|||||||
struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct {
|
struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct {
|
||||||
bool has_amd_lock_mb_bug; // Processor has AMD memory-barrier bug; do lfence
|
bool has_amd_lock_mb_bug; // Processor has AMD memory-barrier bug; do lfence
|
||||||
// after acquire compare-and-swap.
|
// after acquire compare-and-swap.
|
||||||
#if !defined(__SSE2__)
|
|
||||||
bool has_sse2; // Processor has SSE2.
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
extern struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures;
|
extern struct AtomicOps_x86CPUFeatureStruct AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -94,10 +91,7 @@ inline void NoBarrier_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
|||||||
*ptr = value;
|
*ptr = value;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__SSE2__)
|
// We require SSE2, so mfence is guaranteed to exist.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// 64-bit implementations of memory barrier can be simpler, because it
|
|
||||||
// "mfence" is guaranteed to exist.
|
|
||||||
inline void MemoryBarrier() {
|
inline void MemoryBarrier() {
|
||||||
__asm__ __volatile__("mfence" : : : "memory");
|
__asm__ __volatile__("mfence" : : : "memory");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -107,28 +101,6 @@ inline void Acquire_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
|||||||
MemoryBarrier();
|
MemoryBarrier();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#else
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
inline void MemoryBarrier() {
|
|
||||||
if (AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures.has_sse2) {
|
|
||||||
__asm__ __volatile__("mfence" : : : "memory");
|
|
||||||
} else { // mfence is faster but not present on PIII
|
|
||||||
Atomic32 x = 0;
|
|
||||||
NoBarrier_AtomicExchange(&x, 0); // acts as a barrier on PIII
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
inline void Acquire_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
|
||||||
if (AtomicOps_Internalx86CPUFeatures.has_sse2) {
|
|
||||||
*ptr = value;
|
|
||||||
__asm__ __volatile__("mfence" : : : "memory");
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
NoBarrier_AtomicExchange(ptr, value);
|
|
||||||
// acts as a barrier on PIII
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
inline void Release_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
inline void Release_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
||||||
ATOMICOPS_COMPILER_BARRIER();
|
ATOMICOPS_COMPILER_BARRIER();
|
||||||
*ptr = value; // An x86 store acts as a release barrier.
|
*ptr = value; // An x86 store acts as a release barrier.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user