Revert r8753.

It caused a regressions in compile time in the optimizing compiler. I'm reverting until
the reason for this is identified and fixed.

TBR=whesse@chromium.org
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7453024

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8762 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This commit is contained in:
fschneider@chromium.org 2011-07-29 09:14:00 +00:00
parent eef3e8739e
commit 6637fa2835

View File

@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ void HValue::RegisterUse(int index, HValue* new_value) {
void HValue::AddNewRange(Range* r) {
if (!HasRange()) ComputeInitialRange();
if (!HasRange()) range_ = new Range();
ASSERT(HasRange());
r->StackUpon(range_);
range_ = r;
@ -861,22 +862,27 @@ void HInstanceOf::PrintDataTo(StringStream* stream) {
Range* HValue::InferRange() {
if (representation().IsInteger32()) {
// Untagged integer32 cannot be -0.
return new Range ();
} else {
// Tagged values, untagged doubles, and values with unknown representation
// can contain -0.
if (representation().IsTagged()) {
// Tagged values are always in int32 range when converted to integer,
// but they can contain -0.
Range* result = new Range();
result->set_can_be_minus_zero(true);
return result;
} else if (representation().IsNone()) {
return NULL;
} else {
// Untagged integer32 cannot be -0 and we don't compute ranges for
// untagged doubles.
return new Range();
}
}
Range* HConstant::InferRange() {
if (has_int32_value_) {
return new Range(int32_value_, int32_value_);
Range* result = new Range(int32_value_, int32_value_);
result->set_can_be_minus_zero(false);
return result;
}
return HValue::InferRange();
}
@ -885,7 +891,8 @@ Range* HConstant::InferRange() {
Range* HPhi::InferRange() {
if (representation().IsInteger32()) {
if (block()->IsLoopHeader()) {
return new Range();
Range* range = new Range(kMinInt, kMaxInt);
return range;
} else {
Range* range = OperandAt(0)->range()->Copy();
for (int i = 1; i < OperandCount(); ++i) {