[cleanup] Remove obsolete comment.
The introduction of the FeedbackVector solved the problem of inconsistent feedback between ICs in unoptimized and optimized code. Bug: v8:2029, v8:9183 Tbr: jkummerow@chromium.org Change-Id: Id61033c1661e5a2efb740988552de76f7f148d0d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1649566 Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62065}
This commit is contained in:
parent
92c6af8a2d
commit
848379c34f
@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ void IC::OnFeedbackChanged(Isolate* isolate, FeedbackVector vector,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
isolate->runtime_profiler()->NotifyICChanged();
|
||||
// TODO(2029): When an optimized function is patched, it would
|
||||
// be nice to propagate the corresponding type information to its
|
||||
// unoptimized version for the benefit of later inlining.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool MigrateDeprecated(Handle<Object> object) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user