[inspector] Add support for the RegExp d
flag
Prior to this patch, the RemoteObject for e.g. `/x/d` got a `description` that omitted the new `d` (`hasIndices`) flag. Bug: v8:11684, v8:9548 Change-Id: I774fbd9620c6f3f2f19b819c9009fab7cc2e3229 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2848460 Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74148}
This commit is contained in:
parent
98300313b3
commit
87646f76ed
@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ String16 descriptionForRegExp(v8::Isolate* isolate,
|
||||
description.append(toProtocolString(isolate, value->GetSource()));
|
||||
description.append('/');
|
||||
v8::RegExp::Flags flags = value->GetFlags();
|
||||
if (flags & v8::RegExp::Flags::kHasIndices) description.append('d');
|
||||
if (flags & v8::RegExp::Flags::kGlobal) description.append('g');
|
||||
if (flags & v8::RegExp::Flags::kIgnoreCase) description.append('i');
|
||||
if (flags & v8::RegExp::Flags::kLinear) description.append('l');
|
||||
|
@ -397,6 +397,16 @@ Running test: testBigInt
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Running test: testRegExp
|
||||
'/w+/d', returnByValue: false, generatePreview: false
|
||||
{
|
||||
result : {
|
||||
className : RegExp
|
||||
description : /w+/d
|
||||
objectId : <objectId>
|
||||
subtype : regexp
|
||||
type : object
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
'/w+/g', returnByValue: false, generatePreview: false
|
||||
{
|
||||
result : {
|
||||
@ -457,11 +467,11 @@ Running test: testRegExp
|
||||
type : object
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
'/w+/gimsuy', returnByValue: false, generatePreview: false
|
||||
'/w+/dgimsuy', returnByValue: false, generatePreview: false
|
||||
{
|
||||
result : {
|
||||
className : RegExp
|
||||
description : /w+/gimsuy
|
||||
description : /w+/dgimsuy
|
||||
objectId : <objectId>
|
||||
subtype : regexp
|
||||
type : object
|
||||
|
@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ InspectorTest.runAsyncTestSuite([
|
||||
})).result);
|
||||
},
|
||||
async function testRegExp() {
|
||||
InspectorTest.logMessage((await evaluate({
|
||||
expression: '/\w+/d'
|
||||
})).result);
|
||||
InspectorTest.logMessage((await evaluate({
|
||||
expression: '/\w+/g'
|
||||
})).result);
|
||||
@ -219,7 +222,7 @@ InspectorTest.runAsyncTestSuite([
|
||||
expression: '/\w+/y'
|
||||
})).result);
|
||||
InspectorTest.logMessage((await evaluate({
|
||||
expression: '/\w+/gimsuy'
|
||||
expression: '/\w+/dgimsuy'
|
||||
})).result);
|
||||
InspectorTest.logMessage((await evaluate({
|
||||
expression: `new RegExp('\\w+', 'g')`,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user