X64: Do not use an AllocateWithoutSpill register if it is invalid. Abandoned in favor of approach in http://codereview.chromium.org/165525/show (Issue 165526)
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/164480 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2693 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This commit is contained in:
parent
903599a2fc
commit
ab041ee4ed
@ -3084,26 +3084,36 @@ void CodeGenerator::VisitCountOperation(CountOperation* node) {
|
||||
is_increment);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have a free register, combine the smi and overflow checks.
|
||||
Result tmp = allocator_->AllocateWithoutSpilling();
|
||||
ASSERT(kSmiTagMask == 1 && kSmiTag == 0);
|
||||
__ movl(tmp.reg(), Immediate(kSmiTagMask));
|
||||
// Smi test.
|
||||
if (tmp.is_valid()) {
|
||||
__ movl(tmp.reg(), Immediate(kSmiTagMask));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Try incrementing or decrementing the smi.
|
||||
__ movq(kScratchRegister, new_value.reg());
|
||||
if (is_increment) {
|
||||
__ addl(kScratchRegister, Immediate(Smi::FromInt(1)));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
__ subl(kScratchRegister, Immediate(Smi::FromInt(1)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
// deferred->Branch(overflow);
|
||||
__ cmovl(overflow, kScratchRegister, tmp.reg());
|
||||
__ testl(kScratchRegister, tmp.reg());
|
||||
tmp.Unuse();
|
||||
deferred->Branch(not_zero);
|
||||
|
||||
// Go to the deferred case if the result overflows or is non-smi.
|
||||
if (tmp.is_valid()){
|
||||
__ cmovl(overflow, kScratchRegister, tmp.reg());
|
||||
__ testl(kScratchRegister, tmp.reg());
|
||||
tmp.Unuse();
|
||||
deferred->Branch(not_zero);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
deferred->Branch(overflow);
|
||||
__ testl(kScratchRegister, Immediate(kSmiTagMask));
|
||||
deferred->Branch(not_zero);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__ movq(new_value.reg(), kScratchRegister);
|
||||
|
||||
deferred->BindExit();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Postfix: store the old value in the allocated slot under the
|
||||
// reference.
|
||||
if (is_postfix) frame_->SetElementAt(target.size(), &old_value);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user