Optimize String.prototype.includes
This patch removes the MathMax call from String.prototype.includes in order to improve performance. With some quick and dirty benchmarking, (test case courtesy of the node folks) a sizable performance gain is visible: d8> function testIndexOf() { var stringArray = [ 'hello', 'world', '123', 'abc' ]; return stringArray.some(function(val, idx, arr) { return val.indexOf('world') !== -1 })} d8> function testIncludes() { var stringArray = [ 'hello', 'world', '123', 'abc' ]; return stringArray.some(function(val, idx, arr) { return val.includes('world') })} d8> function testTime(fn) { var before = Date.now(); fn(); return Date.now() - before; } d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIncludes() } }) 2244 d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIndexOf() } }) 2212 Compare that to before the test, when the performance difference was much larger: d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIndexOf() } }) 2223 d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIncludes() } }) 2650 In my runs, performance of both functions drifts up and down, but running them in quick succession back and forth shows a roughly consistent delta of about this magnitude. String.prototype.includes is still slightly (maybe 5%) slower than String.prototype.indexOf, but the effect is significantly reduced. R=adamk BUG=v8:3807 LOG=Y Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1231673008 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29665}
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ec841f2b5
commit
d20a509042
@ -1031,27 +1031,29 @@ function StringEndsWith(searchString /* position */) { // length == 1
|
||||
function StringIncludes(searchString /* position */) { // length == 1
|
||||
CHECK_OBJECT_COERCIBLE(this, "String.prototype.includes");
|
||||
|
||||
var s = TO_STRING_INLINE(this);
|
||||
var string = TO_STRING_INLINE(this);
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_REGEXP(searchString)) {
|
||||
throw MakeTypeError(kFirstArgumentNotRegExp, "String.prototype.includes");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var ss = TO_STRING_INLINE(searchString);
|
||||
searchString = TO_STRING_INLINE(searchString);
|
||||
var pos = 0;
|
||||
if (%_ArgumentsLength() > 1) {
|
||||
pos = %_Arguments(1); // position
|
||||
pos = $toInteger(pos);
|
||||
pos = TO_INTEGER(pos);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var s_len = s.length;
|
||||
var start = MathMin(MathMax(pos, 0), s_len);
|
||||
var ss_len = ss.length;
|
||||
if (ss_len + start > s_len) {
|
||||
var stringLength = string.length;
|
||||
if (pos < 0) pos = 0;
|
||||
if (pos > stringLength) pos = stringLength;
|
||||
var searchStringLength = searchString.length;
|
||||
|
||||
if (searchStringLength + pos > stringLength) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return %StringIndexOf(s, ss, start) !== -1;
|
||||
return %StringIndexOf(string, searchString, pos) !== -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user