Why this is better:
1) Not needing an extra template parameter for Checkpoints ctors. This was
especially confusing since the template parameter was named Parser and Parser is
also used as a type name and is also a concrete type. This CL makes it clear
that ParserTraits::Checkpoint is consturcted with ParserBase<ParserTraits> -
that's the only sensemaking type for the ctor param anyway.
2) This CL makes ParserBase define a Checkpoint base class (which knows how
to create and restore a checkpoint with ParserBase) which
PreParserTraits::Checkpoint and ParserTraits::Checkpoint inherit, and not the
other way around.
This is a more intuitive way to implement the "base functionality + extending
it" concept than the previous solution. The previous solution was to allow
Traits to define a Checkpoint class and make ParserBase<Traits>::ParserCheckpoint
(which defines the base functionality) inherit from it.
3) This CL moves the Checkpoint class definitions out of the SomeTraits::Type
struct; SomeTraits::Type is supposed to be a collection of typedefs and not
contain anything else.
Checkpoints were introduced in r22925 ( https://codereview.chromium.org/443903003 ).
BUG=
R=wingo@igalia.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/485473004
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@23266 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
(parser or code) and to be explicit about cache consumption or production
(rather than making presence of cached_data imply one or the other.)
Also add a --cache flag to d8, to allow testing the functionality.
-----------------------------
API change
Reason: Currently, V8 supports a 'parser cache' for repeatedly executing the same script. We'd like to add a 2nd mode that would cache code, and would like to let the embedder decide which mode they chose (if any).
Note: Previously, the 'use cached data' property was implied by the presence of the cached data itself. (That is, kNoCompileOptions and source->cached_data != NULL.) That is no longer sufficient, since the presence of data is no longer sufficient to determine /which kind/ of data is present.
Changes from old behaviour:
- If you previously didn't use caching, nothing changes.
Example:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kNoCompileOptions);
- If you previously used caching, it worked like this:
- 1st run:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kProduceToCache);
Then, source->cached_data would contain the
data-to-be cached. This remains the same, except you
need to tell V8 which type of data you want.
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kProduceParserCache);
- 2nd run:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kNoCompileOptions);
with source->cached_data set to the data you received in
the first run. This will now ignore the cached data, and
you need to explicitly tell V8 to use it:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kConsumeParserCache);
-----------------------------
BUG=
R=marja@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/389573006
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22431 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Arrow functions are parsed from ParseAssignmentExpression(). Handling the
parameter list is done by letting ParseConditionalExpression() parse a comma
separated list of identifiers, and it returns a tree of BinaryOperation nodes
with VariableProxy leaves, or a single VariableProxy if there is only one
parameter. When the arrow token "=>" is found, the VariableProxy nodes are
passed to ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(), which will then skip parsing the
paramaeter list. This avoids having to rewind when the arrow is found and
restart parsing the parameter list.
Note that the empty parameter list "()" is handled directly in
ParsePrimaryExpression(): after is has consumed the opening parenthesis,
if a closing parenthesis follows, then the only valid input is an arrow
function. In this case, ParsePrimaryExpression() directly calls
ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(), to avoid needing to return a sentinel value
to signal the empty parameter list. Because it will consume the body of
the arrow function, ParseAssignmentExpression() will not see the arrow
"=>" token as next, and return the already-parser expression.
The implementation is done in ParserBase, so it was needed to do some
additions to ParserBase, ParserTraits and PreParserTraits. Some of the
glue code can be removed later on when more more functionality is moved
to ParserBase.
Additionally, this adds a runtime flag "harmony_arrow_functions"
(disabled by default); enabling "harmony" will enable it as well.
BUG=v8:2700
LOG=N
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/383983002
Patch from Adrián Pérez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22366 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Arrow functions are parsed from ParseAssignmentExpression(). Handling the
parameter list is done by letting ParseConditionalExpression() parse a comma
separated list of identifiers, and it returns a tree of BinaryOperation nodes
with VariableProxy leaves, or a single VariableProxy if there is only one
parameter. When the arrow token "=>" is found, the VariableProxy nodes are
passed to ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(), which will then skip parsing the
paramaeter list. This avoids having to rewind when the arrow is found and
restart parsing the parameter list.
Note that the empty parameter list "()" is handled directly in
ParsePrimaryExpression(): after is has consumed the opening parenthesis,
if a closing parenthesis follows, then the only valid input is an arrow
function. In this case, ParsePrimaryExpression() directly calls
ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(), to avoid needing to return a sentinel value
to signal the empty parameter list. Because it will consume the body of
the arrow function, ParseAssignmentExpression() will not see the arrow
"=>" token as next, and return the already-parser expression.
The implementation is done in ParserBase, so it was needed to do some
additions to ParserBase, ParserTraits and PreParserTraits. Some of the
glue code can be removed later on when more more functionality is moved
to ParserBase.
Additionally, this adds a runtime flag "harmony_arrow_functions"
(disabled by default); enabling "harmony" will enable it as well.
BUG=v8:2700
LOG=N
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/385553003
Patch from Adrián Pérez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22320 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Arrow functions are parsed from ParseAssignmentExpression. Handling the
parameter list is done by letting ParseConditionalExpression() parse
a comma-separated list of identifiers, and it returns a tree of
BinaryOperation nodes with VariableProxy leaves, or a single
VariableProxy if there is only one parameter. When the arrow token "=>"
is found, the VariableProxy nodes are passed to ParseFunctionLiteral(),
which will then skip parsing the paramaeter list. This avoids having
to rewind when the arrow is found and restart parsing the parameter
list. Note that ParseExpression() expects parenthesized expressions
to not be empty, so checking for a closing parenthesis is added in
handling the empty parameter list "()" will accept a right-paren and
return an empty expression, which means that the parameter list is
empty.
Additionally, this adds the following machinery:
- A runtime flag "harmony_arrow_functions" (disabled by default).
Enabling "harmony" will enable it as well.
- An IsArrow bit in SharedFunctionInfo, and accessors for it.
- An IsArrow bit in FunctionLiteral, accessorts for it, and
a constructor parameter to set its value.
- In ParserBase: allow_arrow_functions() and set_allow_arrow_functions()
- A V8 native %FunctionIsArrow(), which is used to skip adding the
"function " prefix when getting the source code for an arrow
function.
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/160073006
Patch from Adrián Pérez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22265 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Moves the strict mode checks and error reporting for the function and
parameter names into a separate CheckStrictFunctionNameAndParameters()
function in ParserBase. Parsing of arrow functions will then use this
new function instead of duplicating the error code.
BUG=
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/332053004
Patch from Adrián Pérez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21896 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
In some places, we pretended that there can be multiple arguments, though in
practice there was only one. In other places (most importantly, PreParser), we
only handled one argument. (This means that we were not able to produce a
multi-argument error inside a lazy function anyway.)
This CL makes it clear that there is ever only one argument.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/273653002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21324 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Removing it seems to be a clear win on mobile: producing symbol data makes cold
parsing 20-30% slower, and having symbol data doesn't make warm parsing any
faster.
Notes:
- V8 used to produce symbol data, but because of a bug, it was never used until
recently. (See fix https://codereview.chromium.org/172753002 which takes the
symbol data into use again.)
- On desktop, warm parsing is faster if we have symbol data, and producing it
during cold parsing doesn't make parsing substantially slower. However, this
doesn't seem to be the case on mobile.
- The preparse data (cached data) will now contain only the positions of the
lazy functions.
BUG=
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/261273003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21146 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Adds new Traits::Type::StatementList definitions both for Parser and
PreParser, and the corresponding NewStatementList() factory function.
This is needed to be able to define in ParserBase parsing functions
that return and manipulate lists of statements.
Moving and renaming PreParser::Statement to PreParserStatement is also
needed so its definition is available earlier for PreParserStatementList
to use it.
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/252423007
Patch from Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@20965 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Esp. get rid of PreCompile in tests, as it's going to be removed.
Notes:
- The new compilation API doesn't have a separate precompilation phase, so there
is no separate way to check for errors except checking the compilation
errors. Removed some tests which don't make sense any more.
- test-api/Regress31661 didn't make sense as a regression test even before the
compilation API changes, because Blink doesn't precompile this short scripts. So
detecting this kind of errors (see crbug.com/31661 for more information) cannot rely
on precompilation errors.
- test-parsing/PreParserStrictOctal has nothing to do with PreParser, and the comment
about "forcing preparsing" was just wrong.
- test-api/PreCompile was supposed to test that "pre-compilation (aka
preparsing) can be called without initializing the whole VM"; that's no longer
true, since there's no separate precompilation step in the new compile
API. There are other tests (test-parsing/DontRegressPreParserDataSizes) which
ensure that we produce cached data.
- Updated tests which test preparsing to use PreParser directly (not via the
preparsing API).
- In the new compilation API, the user doesn't need to deal with ScriptData
ever. It's only used internally, and needed in tests that test internal aspects
(e.g., modify the cached data before passing it back).
- Some tests which used to test preparse + parse now test first time parse +
second time parse, and had to be modified to ensure we don't hit the
compilation cache.
BUG=
R=ulan@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/225743002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@20511 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Notes:
- We use simple recursion to keep track of how many "new" operators we have seen
and where.
- This makes the self-baked stack class PositionStack in parser.cc unnecessary.
- Now the logic is also unified between Parser and PreParser.
- This is a fixed version of r19386.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/168583008
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19417 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Notes:
- We use simple recursion to keep track of how many "new" operators we have seen
and where.
- This makes the self-baked stack class PositionStack in parser.cc unnecessary.
- Now the logic is also unified between Parser and PreParser.
- It might have been a copy-paste artifact (ParseLeftHandSideExpression ->
ParseMemberWithNewPrefixesExpression) that the logic was so complicated
before.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/166943002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19386 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Notes:
- To be able to move the recursive descent functions to ParserBase one at a
time, we temporarily need routing functions from traits to Parser/PreParser,
since the recursive descent functions form a cyclic structure.
- PreParser used to always allow intrinsic syntax. After this CL, it depends on
allow_natives_syntax() which was already in ParserBase.
- This CL also decouples (Pre)ParserTraits better from (Pre)Parser, passing more
information as parameters, so that the Traits don't need to get it from
(Pre)Parser.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/163333003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19374 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Notes:
- This removes Parser::FunctionState and PreParser::FunctionState and adds
ParserBase::FunctionState etc.
- Also the scope stacks and function state stacks are moved to ParserBase.
- PreParser::FunctionState didn't add and subtract
JSFunction::kLiteralsPrefixSize (unlike Parser::FunctionState). Since the
actual value of NextMaterializedLiteralIndex is not used in the Preparser,
this change is valid.
- Traits no longer need functions like is_classic_mode(), since now there is a
unified way of getting the information from the FunctionState / Scope.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/135213007
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19361 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Notes:
- PreParser::Scope was a weird combination of Parser::FunctionState and
Scope. Split it into two (PreParser::FunctionState and PreParser::Scope). This
is necessary for unifying the Parser and the PreParser.
- Scopes take care of language mode and tracking "with".
- FunctionStates take care of counting material literal indexes, properties
etc. and tracking generators.
- PreParser::Scope::InsideWith was a hack to make a FunctionState-like object
take care of tracking "with". It's now the responsibility fo PreParser::Scope
and Scope.
- PreParser::ScopeType is unnecessarly, there is already a ScopeType enum in
v8globals.h.
- Renamed scope stack variables so that they're consistent in Parser and PreParser.
- Parser::FunctionState and Parser::BlockState had an unnecessary dependency to
the Parser; they only need a couple of things from Parser. Broke the
dependency.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/148293011
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19319 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
(Second try, with fixes. First try: https://codereview.chromium.org/149913006/ )
The long-term goal is to move all recursive descent functions from Parser and
PreParser into ParserBase, but first they need to be unified.
Notes:
- The functions moved in this CL: ParseIdentifier, ParseIdentifierName,
ParseIdentifierNameOrGetOrSet, ParseIdentifierOrStrictReservedWord.
- IOW, this CL removes Parser::ParseIdentifier and PreParser::ParseIdentifier
and adds ParserBase::ParseIdentifier, etc.
- Error reporting used to require virtual funcs; now error reporting is moved to
the Traits too, and ParserBase no longer needs to be virtual.
- I had to move PreParser::Identifier out of the PreParser class, because
otherwise PreParserTraits cannot use it in a typedef.
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/158913003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19265 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The long-term goal is to move all recursive descent functions from Parser and
PreParser into ParserBase, but first they need to be unified.
Notes:
- The functions moved in this CL: ParseIdentifier, ParseIdentifierName,
ParseIdentifierNameOrGetOrSet, ParseIdentifierOrStrictReservedWord.
- IOW, this CL removes Parser::ParseIdentifier and PreParser::ParseIdentifier
and adds ParserBase::ParseIdentifier, etc.
- Error reporting used to require virtual funcs; now error reporting is moved to
the Traits too, and ParserBase no longer needs to be virtual.
- I had to move PreParser::Identifier out of the PreParser class, because
otherwise PreParserTraits cannot use it in a typedef.
BUG=v8:3126
LOG=N
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/149913006
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19230 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
We used to have error messages which provide context, like "Variable name may
not be eval or arguments in strict mode", but for other illegal words we only
have non-context specific error messages like "Unexpected reserved word".
Providing the context makes the code unnecessarily complex, since every
individual place must remember to check for eval or arguments. This CL produces
a unified error message ("Unexpected eval or arguments in strict mode"), and puts
the error reporting to (Pre)Parser::ParseIdentifier.
Notes:
- The module feature is so experimental, that I decided to not allow "eval" or
"arguments" as module-related identifiers in the strict mode (even though this
check wasn't there before).
- Unfortunately, there were some inconsistencies, since it was the
responsibility of the caller of ParseIdentifier to check "eval" and "arguments"
and some places didn't have the check for no good reason. This CL is supposed to
keep backward compatibility and *not* introduce any new errors.
- ECMA allows "eval" and "arguments" as labels even in strict mode. (Syntax:
"LabelledStatement: Identifier : Statement", and no strict mode restrictions on
Identifier are listed.)
- Tests which compare error message strings will fail, and need to be updated.
BUG=3126
LOG=N
R=ulan@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/152813005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19112 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
* AstNode now has a position info.
* Removed various ad-hoc position infos from subclasses (most of which had it).
* Position is always set with the constructor, instead of later.
* Take care to use kNoPosition in the right spots, to not crash the debugger.
Still to do:
* Eliminate Conditional::then/else_position and WhileStatement::condition_position.
* Make CaseClause a proper AstNode and eliminate its custom position.
* If possible, eliminate all uses of kNoPosition.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/24076007
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@17183 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This patch refactors the parser and preparser interface to be more
readable and type-safe. It has no behavior changes.
Previously, parsers and preparsers were configured via bitfield called
parser_flags in the Parser constructor, and flags in
PreParser::PreParseProgram, ParserApi::Parse, and ParserApi::PreParse.
This was error-prone in practice: six call sites passed incorrectly
typed values to this interface (a boolean FLAG value, a boolean false
and a boolean true value). None of these errors were caught by the
compiler because it's just an "int".
The parser flags interface was also awkward because it encoded a
language mode, but the language mode was only used to turn on harmony
scoping or not -- it wasn't used to actually set the parser's language
mode.
Fundamentally these errors came in because of the desire for a
procedural parser interface, in ParserApi. Because we need to be able
to configure the parser in various ways, the flags argument got added;
but no one understood how to use the flags properly. Also they were
only used by constructors: callers packed bits, and the constructors
unpacked them into booleans on the parser or preparser.
The solution is to allow parser construction, configuration, and
invocation to be separated. This patch does that.
It passes the existing tests.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13450007
Patch from Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14151 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
* src/api.cc (ScriptData::PreCompile): Fix bogus use of bogus value for
preparsing flags by removing those arguments, which were always zero.
* src/parser.h
* src/parser.cc (ParserApi::PreParse): Remove extension and flags
arguments, both of which were either always 0 or incorrectly used.
* test/cctest/test-parsing.cc (RegressChromium62639, Regress928): Fix
more bogus uses of preparser api.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13496008
Patch from Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14140 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This patchset begins by adding support for "yield", which is unlike other tokens
in JS. In a generator, whether strict or classic, it is a syntactic keyword.
In classic mode it is an identifier. In strict mode it is reserved.
This patch adds YIELD as a token to the scanner, and adapts the preparser and
parser appropriately. It also parses "function*", indicating that a function is
actually a generator, for both eagerly and lazily parsed functions.
Currently "yield" just compiles as "return".
BUG=v8:2355
TEST=mjsunit/harmony/generators-parsing
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/12646003
Patch from Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14116 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Specifically:
- In parser, check that all exports are defined.
- Move JSModule allocation from parser to scope resolution.
- Move JSModule linking from full codegen to scope resolution.
- Implement module accessors for exported value members.
- Allocate module contexts statically along with JSModules
(to allow static linking), but chain them when module literal is evaluated.
- Make module contexts' extension slot refer to resp. JSModule
(makes modules' ScopeInfo accessible from context).
- Some other tweaks to context handling in general.
- Make any code containing module literals (and thus embedding
static references to JSModules) non-cacheable.
This enables accessing module instance objects as expected.
Import declarations are a separate feature and do not work yet.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569
TEST=
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10690043
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@12010 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The CompilationInfo record now saves a Zone, and the compiler pipeline
allocates memory from the Zone in the CompilationInfo. Before
compiling a function, we create a Zone on the stack and save a pointer
to that Zone to the CompilationInfo; which then gets picked up and
allocated from.
BUG=
TEST=
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10534139
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@11877 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
According to ES5 10.4.2(3), eval calls of strict code always require
their own lexical and variable environment. For now we just add a new
scope when we parse the strict mode directive. The clean solution would
be to always have this sope present (even for global eval calls) and
adapt variable binding to cope with that.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1624
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-1624,test262/S10.4.2.1_A1
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9703021
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@11057 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
All module expressions, and all variables that might refer to modules,
are assigned interfaces (module types) that are resolved using
unification. This is necessary to deal with the highly recursive
nature of ES6 modules, which does not allow any kind of bottom-up
strategy for resolving module names and paths.
Error messages are rudimental right now. Probably need to track
more information to make them nicer.
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569
TEST=
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9615009
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10966 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The ES.next draft rev 4 in section 11.13 reads:
It is a Syntax Error if the AssignmentExpression is contained in extended code
and the LeftHandSideExpression is an Identifier that does not statically resolve
to a declarative environment record binding or if the resolved binding is an
immutable binding.
This CL adds corresponding static checks for the immutable binding case.
TEST=mjsunit/harmony/block-const-assign
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8688007
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10156 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
source code positions it gets from the program counter to recreate the scope
chain by reparsing the function or program.
This CL includes the following changes
* Adds source code positions for the assignment added by the rewriter.
* Run the preparser over global code first.
* Use the ScopeType from the ScopeInfo to determine if the code being debugged
is eval, function or global code instead of looking up the '.result' symbol.
TEST=mjsunit/debug-stepout-scope.js
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8590027
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10076 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
So far the parser had its own harmony flag to disable the harmony scoping
feature when parsing native functions. With the introduction of the extended
language mode this becomes unnecessary because native functions will never enter
the extended mode. The parser can thus track FLAG_harmony_scoping and the
language mode of the current scope to see if harmony features are allowed. The
scanner and preparser have to keep their flag, because they can't use
FLAG_harmony_scoping as it is not available for the preparser-process
executable.
This depends on:
http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035/
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8562002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10063 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This CL introduces a third mode next to the non-strict
(henceforth called 'classic mode') and 'strict mode'
which is called 'extended mode' as in the current
ES.next specification drafts. The extended mode is based on
the 'strict mode' and adds new functionality to it. This
means that most of the semantics of these two modes
coincide.
The 'extended mode' is entered instead of the 'strict mode'
during parsing when using the 'strict mode' directive
"use strict" and when the the harmony-scoping flag is
active. This should be changed once it is fully specified how the 'extended mode' is entered.
This change introduces a new 3 valued enum LanguageMode
(see globals.h) corresponding to the modes which is mostly
used by the frontend code. This includes the following
components:
* (Pre)Parser
* Compiler
* SharedFunctionInfo, Scope and ScopeInfo
* runtime functions: StoreContextSlot,
ResolvePossiblyDirectEval, InitializeVarGlobal,
DeclareGlobals
The old enum StrictModeFlag is still used in the backend
when the distinction between the 'strict mode' and the 'extended mode' does not matter. This includes:
* SetProperty runtime function, Delete builtin
* StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC
* StubCache
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10062 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
So far free variables references in eval code are not statically
resolved. For example in
function foo() { var x = 1; eval("y = x"); }
the variable x will get mode DYNAMIC and y will get mode DYNAMIC_GLOBAL,
i.e. free variable references trigger dynamic lookups with a fast case
handling for global variables.
The CL introduces static resolution of free variables references in eval
code. If possible variable references are resolved to bindings belonging to
outer scopes of the eval call site.
This is achieved by deserializing the outer scope chain using
Scope::DeserializeScopeChain prior to parsing the eval code similar to lazy
parsing of functions. The existing code for variable resolution is used,
however resolution starts at the first outer unresolved scope instead of
always starting at the root of the scope tree.
This is a prerequisite for statically checking validity of assignments in
the extended code as specified by the current ES.next draft which will be
introduced by a subsequent CL. More specifically section 11.13 of revision 4
of the ES.next draft reads:
* It is a Syntax Error if the AssignmentExpression is contained in extended
code and the LeftHandSideExpression is an Identifier that does not
statically resolve to a declarative environment record binding or if the
resolved binding is an immutable binding.
TEST=existing tests in mjsunit
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8508052
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9999 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Original commit message:
Add a level of indirection to exception handler addresses.
To support deoptimization of exception handlers, the handler address in the
stack is converted to a pair of code object and an index into a separate
table of code offsets. The index part is invariant under deoptimization.
The index is packed into the handler state field so that handler size does
not change.
R=vegorov@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8538011
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9977 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
To support deoptimization of exception handlers, the handler address in the
stack is converted to a pair of code object and an index into a separate
table of code offsets. The index part is invariant under deoptimization.
The index is packed into the handler state field so that handler size does
not change.
R=vegorov@chromium.org,fschneider@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8462010
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9975 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
* Remove a couple of unused fields from the FunctionLiteral, ensure that all
the bools are packed.
* Rename SaveScope and LexicalScope in the parser.
* Use an enum to generate the numbers 0..N and the dependent count, rather
than static const ints. This is simpler to extend (coming in a future
change).
R=danno@chromium.org,keuchel@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8505012
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9933 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
