Super calls need to refer to .this_function, .new.target and this, and super
property references need to refer to .this_function and this, so that the
is_used for those variables will be set and they will be allocated correctly.
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: Idc58539fccad70c995e029051b59a67ea66bff91
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/506094
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45376}
This pretty much rewrites the preparsed scope data collection. We used to store
the allocation result, but it's faster to just store the raw data which is
needed for deciding it later. (This way we don't need to run the allocation
algorithm for just getting this data.)
For each variable: is_used, maybe_assigned,
has_forced_context_allocation, and for each scope:
inner_scope_calls_eval_.
In addition, this CL moves data handling out of Scope and into
PreParsedScopeData where it belongs and simplifies the API for
PreParsedScopeData.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ia5a4fa52f585cd4f483ce9a92f2dd7d9754f34ed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/451273
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43641}
With the params (a, b, ...c) the param / variable declaration order used to be
"temp, temp, c, a, b". Now it is "temp, temp, a, b, c" as you'd expect. This
makes it easier for PreParser to match the parameter order of Parser.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: I79da04ef3f812bf52c032bed6263c009fecb7988
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447677
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43490}
This is also needed so that PreParser doesn't need to gather more data for arrow
function params in order to create the uninteresting varblock scopes matching
the scopes created in Parser::BuildParameterInitializationBlock.
This cancels the changes in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/444747
which make PreParser create uninteresting scopes for the normal (non-arrow)
function "eval in default param" case.
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: I8957ac0796d8738c63492f7928bca6f00e4b4241
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/446339
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43411}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
> >
> > Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> > if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> > occurs inside a loop. For example:
> >
> > let i = 10;
> > do { var x = i } while (i--):
> >
> > As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> > as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> > syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> > occurs in a block scope.)
> >
> > BUG=v8:5636
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> > Committed: a33fcd663b
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
> Committed: f3ae5ccf57TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43013}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
Original issue's description:
> [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
>
> Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> occurs inside a loop. For example:
>
> let i = 10;
> do { var x = i } while (i--):
>
> As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> occurs in a block scope.)
>
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> Committed: a33fcd663bTBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
occurs inside a loop. For example:
let i = 10;
do { var x = i } while (i--):
As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
occurs in a block scope.)
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
