There are many test names in the v8 code base that prefix
others, which makes it hard to only run those tests.
BUG=chromium:511215
LOG=n
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1251363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29809}
Reason for revert:
All build problems had other reasons.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168303007/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> [Sheriff] Revert until the tree is in a better state.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs.
> >
> > This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
> > tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
> > will be changed in a follow up.
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/f41a81b8a513fc360c500c066b74f223bc9c0223
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
>
> TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/f83444a5f24381ec9ccc28b1e18e1e9370415bb2
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28891}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1179483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28903}
Reason for revert:
All build problems had other causes.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1171943002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> might break stuff
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators.
> >
> > This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
> > overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
> > different indicators are independent.
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/fbe973ff1722a6158a5b2babce9c1a32d26a1d3b
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
>
> TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2a3962d9d2a7415378811f4d56522531332d5a3e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28869}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28901}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Revert until the tree is in a better state.
Original issue's description:
> [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs.
>
> This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
> tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
> will be changed in a follow up.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/f41a81b8a513fc360c500c066b74f223bc9c0223
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1167343003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28891}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Still lots of breakages on some builders. E.g. http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap/builds/3313
Original issue's description:
> Update Test262 to 5/30
>
> This updates the test runner to run all tests in both sloppy
> and strict mode.
>
> It also marks the test in the status file as failing in
> sloppy mode even if all it does is marking the test as
> [PASS, FAIL]. A future CL will have to validate that the
> tests pass and fail in the correct mode.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/d869f4a4801d4ef6868c266c07f9e29d2e29cba5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28879}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,arv@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1173933002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28890}
This updates the test runner to run all tests in both sloppy
and strict mode.
It also marks the test in the status file as failing in
sloppy mode even if all it does is marking the test as
[PASS, FAIL]. A future CL will have to validate that the
tests pass and fail in the correct mode.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28879}
Reason for revert:
might break stuff
Original issue's description:
> [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators.
>
> This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
> overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
> different indicators are independent.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fbe973ff1722a6158a5b2babce9c1a32d26a1d3b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1163373005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28869}
This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
different indicators are independent.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1171943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
will be changed in a follow up.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1168303007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
Without this change, wildcards always overwrite the outcomes
of more specific rules. Now we always merge.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28629}
This changes the unittests suite to be run in only the default variant,
because unit tests are (and should be) written to be independent from
global flags.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1067863007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28054}
This flag is intended as a staging flag for TurboFan. It serves as a
single flag that always enables a most recent configuration of TurboFan
for test suites and benchmarks, without needing to update test drivers.
R=titzer@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1094573002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27896}
Second try. Disabled the tests that were failing due to
https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/215
This updates test262 to revision d24fd10 (2015/03/11).
The files moved around in the test repo and a lot of new tests are
failing.
BUG=None
LOG=N
R=adamk, rossberg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1040093003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27543}
Reason for revert:
Bot failed to include verifyNotEnumerable function for some screwed up reason.
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Update test262 tests
>
> This updates test262 to revision d24fd10 (2015/03/11).
>
> The files moved around in the test repo and a lot of new tests are
> failing.
>
> BUG=None
> LOG=N
> R=rossberg
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/4f2fb3835feff3663146f12be42b01a226d0065e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27522}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=None
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1047713002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27525}
This updates test262 to revision d24fd10 (2015/03/11).
The files moved around in the test repo and a lot of new tests are
failing.
BUG=None
LOG=N
R=rossberg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1025043002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27522}
Contribution of PowerPC port (continuation of 422063005 and 817143002). This patch covers
the key changes needed to the common files needed to support AIX. Subsequent
patches will cover:
- changes to update the ppc directories so they are current with the changes
in the rest of the project.
- remaining AIX changes not resolved by 4.8 compiler
- individual optimizations for PPC
This is based off of the GitHub repository
https://github.com/andrewlow/v8ppcR=danno@chromium.org, svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/866843003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26343}
There are separated JS and C stacks on simulators so for some stack
extensive tests (like mozilla/js1_5/extensions/regress-355497) might
cause a C stack overflow and that overflow is not caught by V8. It is
not an issue on real HW. Increasing the C stack also solves the problem
but we have already FLAG_sim_stack_size flag to control the JS stack
size.
This patch makes it possible to add flags to tests conditionally in
.status files.
TEST=mozilla/js1_5/extensions/regress-355497
BUG=v8:3152
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/735723006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25434}
