In case of duplicate exports, always report the error for the very last
one.
(Fixed a bug.)
BUG=v8:5358,v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2340953002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39434}
This removes two bits of duplication:
- Parsing of each AssignmentExpression, which previously was called
first outside the loop and then inside the loop.
- Parsing of arrow rest parameters, which previously was handled
separately for the one-arg and N-arg cases.
The only change in behavior is in a few error messages.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39030}
Tail calls don't make sense from async functions and generators, as
each activation of these functions needs to make a new, distnict,
non-reused generator object. These tail calls are not required per
spec. This patch disables both syntactic and implicit tail calls
in async functions and generators.
R=neis
BUG=v8:5301,chromium:639270
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2278413003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38986}
Stack trace generation requires access to the receiver; and while the
receiver is already on the stack, we cannot determine its position
during stack trace generation (it's stored in argv[0], and argc is only
stored in a callee-saved register).
This patch grants access to the receiver by pushing argc onto builtin
exit frames as an extra argument. Compared to simply pushing the
receiver, this requires an additional dereference during stack trace
generation, but one fewer during builtin calls.
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106883003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37500}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel;tryserver.v8:v8_linux_nosnap_dbg
Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37416}
Reason for revert:
Looks like this breaks on nosnap: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug/builds/7626
Original issue's description:
> [builtins] New frame type for exits to C++ builtins
>
> Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
> frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
> show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
>
> Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
> not skipped during stack trace construction.
>
> BUG=v8:4815
> R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37394}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Unlike previous implementation where the 'continue' keyword was a feature of a return statement the keyword is now recognized as a part of expression. Error reporting was significantly improved.
--harmony-explicit-tailcalls option is now orthogonal to --harmony-tailcalls so we can test both modes at the same time.
This CL also adds %GetExceptionDetails(exception) that fetches hidden |start_pos| and |end_pos| values from the exception object.
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1928203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36024}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
This prepares for pulling chromium's build as dependency for
gn. After this, the files in build and gypfiles need to stay
in sync until chromium is updated.
BUG=chromium:474921
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1848553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35898}
The parser uses a try-catch in order to record when the client of an iterator
throws. The exception then used to get rethrown via 'throw', which
unfortunately resulted in the original exception message object getting
overwritten.
This CL solves this as follows:
- add a clear_pending_message flag to TryCatchStatement (set to true in normal
cases),
- set clear_pending_message to false for the TryCatchStatement used in iterator
finalization
- change full-codegen, turbofan, and the interpreter to emit the ClearPendingMessage call
only when the flag is set,
- replace 'throw' with '%ReThrow' in the iterator finalization code, thus
reusing the (not-cleared) pending message
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4875
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1842953003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35226}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
This rebaselines all our internal tests for error messages thrown by the
implementation of 'instanceof' to the new ES6 semantics. It also applies
a minor rephrasing to the messages in question.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4447
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1822663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34940}
It was never being set to false in production (though it was in test-parsing.cc,
due to that test having its own flag-setting logic).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1815033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34878}
test262 "negative" test expectations list which exception is thrown. The ES2017
draft specification is very specific about which exception class is thrown
from which path, and V8 works hard to be correct with respect to that spec.
Previously, the test262 test runner would accept any nonzero status code,
such as from a crash, or a FAIL printed out, for a negative test. This
patch makes negative tests check for the right answer using a quick-and-dirty
parsing of the exception printing from d8 to find the exception class.
It invokes d8 in a way to get a status code of 0 from thrown exceptions
so that 'negative' tests aren't actually implemented by negating the output.
Amazingly, this didn't catch any test262 failures, but I verified the extra
checking interactively by changing a negative test to expect a different type
and saw it fail.
BUG=v8:4803
R=machenbach
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1766503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34763}
This moves the last remaining JS file based tests out of the "preparser"
suite. The tests in question all are expected to parse normally and not
throw any exception. This also deprecates the ability of the test suite
to run anything else outside Python templated tests.
R=adamk@chromium.org
TEST=preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1782173005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34753}
This converts another test case that is expected to throw a TypeError
but no SyntaxError to have better test coverage (exact message is being
checked now).
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1786623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34715}
This converts existing "preparser" tests that expect a certain exception
message to be produced into "message" tests. Thereby we get much better
coverage because the former test suite degraded by now to just check
whether each test case threw or not, the exception message was not being
checked at all.
This also deprecates the ability of "preparser" to specify that single
test cases based on JS files are expected to throw, "messages" is far
superior, use that test suite instead.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784013003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34713}
This also runs the message test suite against Ignition. By now most of
the source positions (and exception messages) are accurate, the failing
ones have been blacklisted.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1783773003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34708}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
This avoids spending lots of time in Scope::RemoveUnresolved for very long
variable declaration lists.
BUG=v8:4699
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1655313003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34047}
Reason for revert:
Crash fixed by https://codereview.chromium.org/1564923007
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
> >
> > This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> > changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> > function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> > themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> > riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> > pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
> >
> > R=adamk@chromium.org
> > BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> > LOG=Y
> > CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
>
> TBR=adamk@chromium.org
> # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
> LOG=Y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/adac5956c6216056a211cfaa460a00ac1500d8f8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33189}
Reason for revert:
Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
Original issue's description:
> Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
>
> This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
>
> R=adamk@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> LOG=Y
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1565263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
LOG=Y
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
These constructors always go through C++ at least twice anyway, so
there's not really a point in trying to implement them in JavaScript.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:535408
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1548623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33012}
This will make sure that message tests cover both the parser and preparser
paths, just as we do for parsing-related cctests.
BUG=v8:4372
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1469383004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32307}
The first bug was that there are two different "initialization positions"
passed into PatternRewriter::DeclareAndInitializeVariables, and we weren't
setting them all properly for this case.
After further code review, it became clear that we weren't even recording
the correct position (the end of the initializer expression).
The combination of those two bugs caused the hole check elimination code
in full-codegen to skip emitting a hole check.
This patch takes care of both of those things. A follow-up will try
to reduce the number of "initializer positions" we track in the
variable declaration code.
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4568
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1468143004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32237}
