Reason for revert:
Blocks the roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1497763004/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Correctify and unify ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors.
>
> The ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors should raise an
> exception when called with no arguments or undefined length. Also
> unified the ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer implementations as C++
> builtins, and removed some (now) obsolete runtime entries.
>
> R=yangguo@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/3235ccbb7826ceec2188f6ebab98fc851b54f60e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32590}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,cbruni@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1501673002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32606}
The ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors should raise an
exception when called with no arguments or undefined length. Also
unified the ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer implementations as C++
builtins, and removed some (now) obsolete runtime entries.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1500543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32590}
According to the ES6 spec, the main methods and getters shouldn't
be properties of the individual TypedArray objects and prototypes
but instead on %TypedArray% and %TypedArray%.prototype. This
difference is observable through introspection. This patch moves
some methods and getters to the proper place, with the exception
of %TypedArray%.prototype.subarray and harmony methods. These will
be moved in follow-on patches.
BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1186733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29057}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
