Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Seth Brenith
7be64db45f Reland "[interpreter] Short Star bytecode"
This is a reland of cf93071c91

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Short Star bytecode
>
> Design doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g_NExMT78II_KnIYNa9MvyPYIj23qAiFUEsyemY5KRk/edit
>
> This change adds 16 new interpreter opcodes, kStar0 through kStar15, so
> that we can use a single byte to represent the common operation of
> storing to a low-numbered register. This generally reduces the quantity
> of bytecode generated on web sites by 8-9%.
>
> In order to not degrade speed, a couple of other changes are required:
>
> The existing lookahead logic to check for Star after certain other
> bytecode handlers is updated to check for these new short Star codes
> instead. Furthermore, that lookahead logic is updated to contain its own
> copy of the dispatch jump rather than merging control flow with the
> lookahead-failed case, to improve branch prediction.
>
> A bunch of constants use bytecode size in bytes as a proxy for the size
> or complexity of a function, and are adjusted downward proportionally to
> the decrease in generated bytecode size.
>
> Other small drive-by fix: update generate-bytecode-expectations to emit
> \n instead of \r\n on Windows.
>
> Change-Id: I6307c2b0f5794a3a1088bb0fb94f6e1615441ed5
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2641180
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72773}

Change-Id: I1afb670c25694498b3989de615858f984a8c7f6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2698057
Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72821}
2021-02-17 16:18:26 +00:00
Leszek Swirski
08a49bbe50 Revert "[interpreter] Short Star bytecode"
This reverts commit cf93071c91.

Reason for revert: Speculative revert because of Mac4 GC stress failure: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Mac64%20GC%20Stress/16697/overview

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Short Star bytecode
>
> Design doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g_NExMT78II_KnIYNa9MvyPYIj23qAiFUEsyemY5KRk/edit
>
> This change adds 16 new interpreter opcodes, kStar0 through kStar15, so
> that we can use a single byte to represent the common operation of
> storing to a low-numbered register. This generally reduces the quantity
> of bytecode generated on web sites by 8-9%.
>
> In order to not degrade speed, a couple of other changes are required:
>
> The existing lookahead logic to check for Star after certain other
> bytecode handlers is updated to check for these new short Star codes
> instead. Furthermore, that lookahead logic is updated to contain its own
> copy of the dispatch jump rather than merging control flow with the
> lookahead-failed case, to improve branch prediction.
>
> A bunch of constants use bytecode size in bytes as a proxy for the size
> or complexity of a function, and are adjusted downward proportionally to
> the decrease in generated bytecode size.
>
> Other small drive-by fix: update generate-bytecode-expectations to emit
> \n instead of \r\n on Windows.
>
> Change-Id: I6307c2b0f5794a3a1088bb0fb94f6e1615441ed5
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2641180
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72773}

TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,mythria@chromium.org,seth.brenith@microsoft.com

Change-Id: I0162b9400861b90bacef27cca9aebc8ab9d74c10
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2697350
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72777}
2021-02-16 15:50:22 +00:00
Seth Brenith
cf93071c91 [interpreter] Short Star bytecode
Design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g_NExMT78II_KnIYNa9MvyPYIj23qAiFUEsyemY5KRk/edit

This change adds 16 new interpreter opcodes, kStar0 through kStar15, so
that we can use a single byte to represent the common operation of
storing to a low-numbered register. This generally reduces the quantity
of bytecode generated on web sites by 8-9%.

In order to not degrade speed, a couple of other changes are required:

The existing lookahead logic to check for Star after certain other
bytecode handlers is updated to check for these new short Star codes
instead. Furthermore, that lookahead logic is updated to contain its own
copy of the dispatch jump rather than merging control flow with the
lookahead-failed case, to improve branch prediction.

A bunch of constants use bytecode size in bytes as a proxy for the size
or complexity of a function, and are adjusted downward proportionally to
the decrease in generated bytecode size.

Other small drive-by fix: update generate-bytecode-expectations to emit
\n instead of \r\n on Windows.

Change-Id: I6307c2b0f5794a3a1088bb0fb94f6e1615441ed5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2641180
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72773}
2021-02-16 14:43:36 +00:00
Santiago Aboy Solanes
9d3dc6f219 [interpreter] Make FunctionEntry StackCheck bytecodes implicit
FunctionEntry StackChecks is one of the two cases where we generate a
StackCheck bytecode. In these cases, we do stack check against the js
limit (not to be confused with the real js limit). Their purpose is to
be able to interrupt the running code.

We can omit the FunctionEntry StackCheck by embedding its code into
the InterpreterEntryTrampoline builtin. We save one bytecode per
interpreted function.

This change has rippling effects for optimized code, as well as the
deoptimizer.

Bug: v8:10149, v8:9977, v8:9960
Change-Id: I6156de48b3bc0b519dd21190a8e6214fbe96c78d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1914218
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66206}
2020-02-10 17:05:23 +00:00
Jaroslav Sevcik
60c0edc08c [interpreter] Store CreateObjectLiteral's result into the accumulator.
As opposed to the register.

For subtle reasons, this fixes a deoptimizer bug with handling return
values in lazy deopt. Since the return values can now only overwrite
the accumulator, there is no danger of overwriting a captured object
that might be later used (since there is no "later").

Bug: chromium:902608
Change-Id: I3a7a10bb1c7a6f4303a01d60f80680afcb7bc942
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325901
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57349}
2018-11-08 10:31:45 +00:00
Creddy
ec8700c418 [interpreter][runtime] Avoid AllocationSites for oneshot code
No need to create allocation site for literals in oneshot code since
they are executed only once. The interpreter emits a runtime call to
CreateObjectLiteralWithoutAllocationSite for creating literals in
oneshot code instead.

Change-Id: I224b3a30f10361cfe9ff63129b36da8230c5e403
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1163615
Commit-Queue: Chandan Reddy <chandanreddy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55050}
2018-08-10 13:34:13 +00:00
Creddy
3b2b858f11 Reland "[Interpreter] Do not use IC slots for property load/stores in an IIFE and top-level code"
This is a reland of 690bda84eb

Original change's description:
> [Interpreter] Do not use IC slots for property load/stores in an IIFE and top-level code
> 
> An IIFE or top-level code is executed only once hence, there is no need to collect
> type feedback. We can save some memory by not using IC slots for property Loads/Stores
> within a IIFE/top-level code. This CL emits Runtime Get/Set property calls instead of LdaNamedProperty
> /StaNamedProperty for the property loads within a IIFE and top-level code.
> 
> Change-Id: I3e0ce26d05d82bb3648cb9262c4e112a2c4556c9
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1146579
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Chandan Reddy <chandanreddy@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#54949}

Change-Id: I7b07ce86f7236d82191caaceafd31b86e5863ff5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1167802
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Chandan Reddy <chandanreddy@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55017}
2018-08-09 10:47:38 +00:00
Michael Achenbach
247e179ca7 Revert "[Interpreter] Do not use IC slots for property load/stores in an IIFE and top-level code"
This reverts commit 690bda84eb.

Reason for revert: Speculative revert for:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/luci.v8.ci/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/25372

See more at:
https://github.com/v8/v8/wiki/Blink-layout-tests

Original change's description:
> [Interpreter] Do not use IC slots for property load/stores in an IIFE and top-level code
> 
> An IIFE or top-level code is executed only once hence, there is no need to collect
> type feedback. We can save some memory by not using IC slots for property Loads/Stores
> within a IIFE/top-level code. This CL emits Runtime Get/Set property calls instead of LdaNamedProperty
> /StaNamedProperty for the property loads within a IIFE and top-level code.
> 
> Change-Id: I3e0ce26d05d82bb3648cb9262c4e112a2c4556c9
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1146579
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Chandan Reddy <chandanreddy@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#54949}

TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,cbruni@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,chandanreddy@google.com

Change-Id: I642164a72453189fd0fe92b69f199f958ce56bef
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1166782
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#54955}
2018-08-08 06:39:55 +00:00
Creddy
690bda84eb [Interpreter] Do not use IC slots for property load/stores in an IIFE and top-level code
An IIFE or top-level code is executed only once hence, there is no need to collect
type feedback. We can save some memory by not using IC slots for property Loads/Stores
within a IIFE/top-level code. This CL emits Runtime Get/Set property calls instead of LdaNamedProperty
/StaNamedProperty for the property loads within a IIFE and top-level code.

Change-Id: I3e0ce26d05d82bb3648cb9262c4e112a2c4556c9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1146579
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Chandan Reddy <chandanreddy@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#54949}
2018-08-07 14:58:43 +00:00