Modules already have a separate entrypoint into the engine (at the moment,
this is v8::ScriptCompiler::CompileModule, though that will change to
something like ParseModule). This meant that requiring a commandline flag
simply added an extra complexity burden on embedders. By removing the v8
flag, this lets embedders use their own flagging mechanism (such as d8's
"--module", or Blink's RuntimeEnabledFeatures) to control whether
modules are to be used.
Also remove old modules tests that were being skipped (since they test
very old, pre-ES2015 modules syntax).
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569, chromium:594639
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804693002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34764}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
ES2015 generally bans FunctionDeclarations in positions which expect a Statement,
as opposed to a StatementListItem, such as a FunctionDeclaration which constitutes
the body of a for loop. However, Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 make exceptions for labeled
function declarations and function declarations as the body of an if statement in
sloppy mode, in the latter case specifying that the semantics are as if the
function declaration occurred in a block. Chrome has historically permitted
further extensions, for the body of any flow control construct.
This patch addresses both the syntactic and semantic mismatches between V8 and
the spec. For the semantic mismatch, function declarations as the body of if
statements change from unconditionally hoisting in certain cases to acquiring
the sloppy mode function in block semantics (based on Annex B 3.3). For the
extra syntax permitted, this patch adds a flag,
--harmony-restrictive-declarations, which excludes disallowed function declaration
cases. A new UseCounter, LegacyFunctionDeclaration, is added to count how often
function declarations occur as the body of other constructs in sloppy mode. With
this patch, the code generally follows the form of the specification with respect
to parsing FunctionDeclarations, rather than allowing them in arbitrary Statement
positions, and makes it more clear where our extensions occur.
BUG=v8:4647
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1757543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34470}
The preparser should ignore "use strong" if the --strong_mode flag
is not turned on, but this should not stop processing subsequent
directives.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1752753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34392}
This frees up one bit in FunctionKind, which I plan to make slightly
more syntactic info about functions available in SharedFunctionInfo
(needed for ES2015 Function.name support).
BUG=v8:3956, v8:4760
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1704223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34125}
This is hopefully the last in a series of cleanup patches around
destructuring assignment. It simplifies the ParseAssignmentExpression
API, making the callers call CheckDestructuringElement() where appropriate.
CheckDestructuringElement has been further simplified to only emit the
errors that the parser depends on it emitting.
I've also beefed up the test coverage in test-parsing.cc to
handling all the destructuring flags being on, which caught an oddity
in how we disallow initializers in spreads in patterns (we need to treat
RewritableAssignmentExpressions as Assignments for the purpose of
error checking).
Finally, I added a few helper methods to ParserBase to handle a few
classes of expressions (assignments and literals-as-patterns).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1696603002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33961}
They were already treated as a BindingPattern error; this patch simply
replaces that call with one marking them as both a binding and assignment
error, and adds parsing tests for both cases.
BUG=v8:4707
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1632303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33528}
Although the `for..in` statement allows Expressions to define the
iterator, only an AssignmentExpression may occupy this position in the
`for..of` statement.
BUG=v8:4692
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1602823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33420}
The old handling of escaped keywords erroneously treated escaped versions
of "let" and "static" as ESCAPED_KEYWORD, leading to erroneous errors in
sloppy mode. Moreover, though the class literal parsing code attempted
to fix up the parsing of escaped versions of "static" to allow it in the
right places, that code wasn't complete.
Fixing the scanner to mark escaped "static" as ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD
allows simplifying the class literal parsing code. A little extra code
was needed to properly handle the new treatment of escaped "let".
Note that "yield" is still broken (that is, we're overly restrictive of
escaped "yield" in sloppy mode).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1602013007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33396}
This includes anonymous Function, Generator, and Class declarations when
preceded by 'export default'. Parsing only at the moment, nothing useful is
done with the parsed Function/ClassLiteral.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1589173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33344}
This patch moves the semantics of 'const' in sloppy mode to match those
in strict mode, that is, const makes lexical (let-like) bindings, must
have an initializer, and does not create properties of the global object.
R=adamk
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:3305
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571873004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33218}
The sloppy block-scoped function declaration placeholder statements
are held in parser_zone_-allocated hashtables. These hashtables are
not updated when local_zone_s are removed. Therefore, the
NewSloppyBlockFunctionStatement method should allocate
SloppyBlockScopeFunctionStatements in the parser_zone_ to avoid a
use-after-free. Scope fixup code may end up updating something which
is thrown away, but this is a small cost and much simpler than
removing dead hashtable entries later.
R=adamk
LOG=Y
BUG=chromium:537816
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1564923007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33185}
The test expectations should fail consistently in both release and debug
builds. DCHECK is only meant for debug-only checks in production code.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1506753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32639}
Attempt #<really big number>
Parses, and lazily rewrites Destructuring Assignment expressions. The rewriting strategy involves inserting a placeholder RewritableAssignmentExpression into the AST, whose content expression can be completely rewritten at a later time.
Lazy rewriting ensures that errors do not occur due to eagerly rewriting nodes which form part of a binding pattern, thus breaking the meaning of the pattern --- or by eagerly rewriting ambiguous constructs that are not immediately known
BUG=v8:811
LOG=Y
R=adamk@chromium.org, bmeurer@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309813007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32623}
Fix several operations in the parser that rewrite constant expressions
to preserve knowledge regarding whether a value originally contained a ".".
This information is required to accurately validate Asm.js typing.
Making the assumption that if either side of a binary operation contains
a dot, that the rewritten expression should be treated as a double for
Asm.js purposes. This is a slight deviation from the spec (which
would forbid mix type operations).
BUG= https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4203
TEST=test-asm-validator, test-parsing
R=titzer@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,aseemgarg@chromium.org
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1492123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32581}
These bits were relevant back when we had nested lexical modules, but
I don't think they'll be of any use for ES2015 modules.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1485053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32534}
Moves all files related to AST and scopes into ast/,
and all files related to scanner & parser to parsing/.
Also eliminates a couple of spurious dependencies.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1481613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32351}
ES6 section 12.2.8.1 states that flags for regular expression literals
must be checked during parsing and invalid flags are early errors. This
change adapts the Scanner and (Pre)Parser to act according to the spec.
This is also a prerequisite to unify the handling of literal creation
(for Objects, Arrays, Regexps, and at some point Classes).
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1472323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32273}
In a function expression, 'yield' is allowed, even if the expression
occurs inside a generator. Similarly, even in a non-generator,
a generator expression's name must not be 'yield'.
BUG=v8:3983
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1460393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32188}
This is in preparation for the addition of --harmony-destructuring-assignment.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1450193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32098}
This patch adds UseCounters for the various language modes. This may
be useful for helping us to prioritize future optimization and
language design decisions.
R=adamk
CC=seththompson
BUG=none
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1429173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31841}
Reason for revert:
MSAN errors on arm64: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20MSAN/builds/5123/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Implement destructuring binding in try/catch
>
> The approach is to desugar
>
> try { ... }
> catch ({x, y}) { ... }
>
> into
>
> try { ... }
> catch (.catch) {
> let x = .catch.x;
> let y = .catch.y;
> ...
> }
>
> using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
> of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
> made inside the catch block.
>
> No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
> us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
> in the spec.
>
> There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
> support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
> good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
> block this moving forward.
>
> BUG=v8:811
> LOG=y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a316db995e6e4253664920652ed4e5a38b2caeba
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:811
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1408063013
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31798}
The approach is to desugar
try { ... }
catch ({x, y}) { ... }
into
try { ... }
catch (.catch) {
let x = .catch.x;
let y = .catch.y;
...
}
using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
made inside the catch block.
No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
in the spec.
There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
block this moving forward.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1417483014
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
- inner_scope_uses_arguments_ was completely unused
- The public accessor for contains_with() was not called
- inside_with() had helper methods on Parser and PatternRewriter, but was
only called in one place.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1409253007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31587}
