In case when F inlined normal call to G which tail calls H we should not write translation for G for the tail call site.
Otherwise we will see G in a stack trace inside H.
This CL also enables all existing tests related to ES6 tail call elimination and adds more combinations.
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Committed: https://crrev.com/689980f7d4dfd4c29492f616d7b616b86ec9af91
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34830}
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1780043004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34920}
In case when F inlined normal call to G which tail calls H we should not write translation for G for the tail call site.
Otherwise we will see G in a stack trace inside H.
This CL also enables all existing tests related to ES6 tail call elimination.
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1780043004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34830}
In case when F was called with incompatible number of arguments (and therefore
the arguments adator frame was created), F inlines a tail call of G which then
deopts the deoptimizer should also remove the arguments adaptor frame for F.
This CL adds required machinery to the deoptimizer.
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1768263004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34610}
In case when F tail calls G we should also remove the potential arguments adaptor frame for F.
This CL introduces two new machine instructions ArchTailCallCodeObjectFromJSFunction and ArchTailCallJSFunctionFromJSFunction which (unlike existing ArchTailCallCodeObject and ArchTailCallJSFunction) also drop arguments adaptor frame if it exists right before jumping to the target function.
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1702423002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34566}
HInvokeFunction and HApplyArguments instructions now support tail calling.
Inlining of calls at tail position is not supported yet and therefore still disabled.
The tail-call-megatest was modified so that the usages of "arguments" object do not disable Crankshaft.
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1760253003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34542}
This CL also enhances a "tail-call-megatest" which now tests product of the following cases:
1) tail caller is inlined/not-inlined
2) tail callee is inlined/not-inlined
3) tail caller has an arguments adaptor frame above or not
4) tail callee has an arguments adaptor frame above or not
5) tail callee is a sloppy/strict/possibly eval/bound/proxy function
6) tail calling via normal call/function.apply/function.call
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1711863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34143}
In case when F inlined normal call to G which tail calls H we should not write translation for G for the tail call site.
Otherwise we will see G in a stack trace inside H.
This CL also adds a "megatest" which tests product of the following cases:
1) tail caller is inlined/not-inlined
2) tail callee is inlined/not-inlined
3) tail caller has an arguments adaptor frame above or not
4) tail callee has an arguments adaptor frame above or not
5) tail callee is a normal/bound/proxy function
Note that tests for not yet supported cases are not run for now.
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1709583002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34108}
