Commit Graph

167 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
conradw
1bb051b8a4 [es6] Fix completion values of for loops with lexical variables
Currently, the desugaring of for loops of the form for
(let/const ...; bla; bla) causes them to always have a
completion value of 1, regardless of whether the loop body
is executed or not. This CL fixes this, realigning
initializer blocks as a more general purpose way to avoid
the completion value rewriter (since that's all they really
do anyway).

BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1177053006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29108}
2015-06-18 11:54:16 +00:00
machenbach
b4d3e1ceba Revert of Add %TypedArray% to proto chain (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1186733002/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Changes layout tests:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2032/builds/429

See e.g.:
https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/V8-Blink_Linux_32/429/layout-test-results/inspector/console/console-big-array-pretty-diff.html

Please upload a blink side needsmanualrebaseline change first for these tests if the change is intended. Please also add a blink trybot on a reland of this CL.

Original issue's description:
> Add %TypedArray% to proto chain
>
> According to the ES6 spec, the main methods and getters shouldn't
> be properties of the individual TypedArray objects and prototypes
> but instead on %TypedArray% and %TypedArray%.prototype. This
> difference is observable through introspection. This patch moves
> some methods and getters to the proper place, with the exception
> of %TypedArray%.prototype.subarray and harmony methods. These will
> be moved in follow-on patches.
>
> BUG=v8:4085
> LOG=Y
> R=adamk
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a10590158260737b256fac3254b4939f48f90095
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29057}

TBR=adamk@chromium.org,arv@chromium.org,littledan@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4085

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1192433003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29070}
2015-06-17 09:05:51 +00:00
littledan
a105901582 Add %TypedArray% to proto chain
According to the ES6 spec, the main methods and getters shouldn't
be properties of the individual TypedArray objects and prototypes
but instead on %TypedArray% and %TypedArray%.prototype. This
difference is observable through introspection. This patch moves
some methods and getters to the proper place, with the exception
of %TypedArray%.prototype.subarray and harmony methods. These will
be moved in follow-on patches.

BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
R=adamk

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1186733002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29057}
2015-06-16 23:39:10 +00:00
caitpotter88
6d22f7a794 [parser] parse CalllExpression TemplateLiteral production
BUG=v8:4183
R=arv@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1184373002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29055}
2015-06-16 18:08:28 +00:00
yangguo
75350f1ef0 Debugger: require debugger to be active when dealing with breaks.
This invariant will save us some head ache.
The changes to test-debug/DebugStub is due to the fact that it abuses
the ability to set break points in code that has no debug break slots.
This is now no longer possible.

R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4132
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181013007

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29038}
2015-06-16 07:11:21 +00:00
arv
5f72593d16 [es6] Make sure we call add property when adding a new property
When setting a property using `super.prop = val` we need to use
add property if we are adding a new property and not set property.

BUG=493566
LOG=N
R=verwaest@chromium.org, dslomov@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1161073002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28971}
2015-06-11 21:24:41 +00:00
machenbach
4e7990d394 Revert of Revert of Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1181533006/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Changes/breaks layout tests. Please land upstream needsmanualrebaseline requests first or fix the tests.

E.g.
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Win/builds/400
One test fails, one times out. See e.g. expectations changes:
https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/V8-Blink_Win/400/layout-test-results/inspector/sources/debugger-async/async-callstack-promises-diff.txt

On linux debug theses tests crash:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064%20%28dbg%29/builds/346
https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/V8-Blink_Linux_64__dbg_/346/layout-test-results/results.html

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1176163004/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> Test failures are bogus. Snapshot blob and natives blob are out of sync due to build being weird.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #8 id:160001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002/)
> >
> > Reason for revert:
> > Test failures: https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3829
> >
> > Original issue's description:
> > > Promise assimilation fix.
> > >
> > > Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
> > > should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
> > > We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
> > >
> > > This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
> > > a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
> > > |accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
> > > ES6 promise doesn't have them.
> > >
> > > LOG=N
> > > BUG=477921
> > >
> > > Committed: https://crrev.com/2f57dff3ea0c45e1a61b334fda962460f89d71bc
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
> >
> > TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
> > NOPRESUBMIT=true
> > NOTREECHECKS=true
> > NOTRY=true
> > BUG=477921
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/5bb75f514027f79303396dba823c2d78c6add83b
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28927}
>
> TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=477921
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/6f214bdd8bcdc76d48bd85c3bd897f0e2427ff95
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28928}

TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=477921

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181603003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28931}
2015-06-11 09:09:18 +00:00
yangguo
6f214bdd8b Revert of Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1176163004/)
Reason for revert:
Test failures are bogus. Snapshot blob and natives blob are out of sync due to build being weird.

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #8 id:160001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> Test failures: https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3829
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Promise assimilation fix.
> >
> > Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
> > should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
> > We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
> >
> > This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
> > a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
> > |accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
> > ES6 promise doesn't have them.
> >
> > LOG=N
> > BUG=477921
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/2f57dff3ea0c45e1a61b334fda962460f89d71bc
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
>
> TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=477921
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/5bb75f514027f79303396dba823c2d78c6add83b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28927}

TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=477921

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181533006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28928}
2015-06-11 08:15:32 +00:00
yangguo
5bb75f5140 Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #8 id:160001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002/)
Reason for revert:
Test failures: https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3829

Original issue's description:
> Promise assimilation fix.
>
> Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
> should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
> We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
>
> This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
> a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
> |accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
> ES6 promise doesn't have them.
>
> LOG=N
> BUG=477921
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2f57dff3ea0c45e1a61b334fda962460f89d71bc
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}

TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=477921

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176163004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28927}
2015-06-11 08:01:15 +00:00
yhirano
2f57dff3ea Promise assimilation fix.
Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.

This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
|accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
ES6 promise doesn't have them.

LOG=N
BUG=477921

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
2015-06-11 07:42:42 +00:00
arv
07c1f277bd Unship harmony tostring
Blink's DOM bindings are not yet ready.

BUG=493137, 239915
LOG=N
R=rossberg, adamk
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153263004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28804}
2015-06-04 17:33:33 +00:00
verwaest
2fb894fa58 Use GetProperty for getting elements.
This also fixes issues with
- kMaxUint32 being a valid length but not index cornercases
- exotic integer objects masking "exotic indexes" even though its in the prototype chain
- concating of holey sloppy arguments

BUG=v8:4137
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1159433003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28754}
2015-06-02 10:42:29 +00:00
mike
f7b5912276 [es6] Define generator prototype as writable prop
The April 14 2015 final draft of the ES6 specification states that the
`prototype` property of generator function instances should be writable.

BUG=v8:4140, v8:4140
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153633003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28641}
2015-05-26 18:31:49 +00:00
dslomov
7ffdb5194d [destructuring] Grand for statement parsing unification.
Also support patterns in ``for (var p in/of ...)``

This CL extends the rewriting we used to do for ``for (let p in/of...)`` to
``for (var p in/of ...)``. For all for..in/of loop declaring variable,
we rewrite
   for (var/let/const pattern in/of e) b
into
   for (x' in/of e) { var/let/const pattern = e; b }

This adds a small complication for debugger: for a statement
   for (var v in/of e) ...
we used to have
   var v;
   for (v in/of e) ...
and there was a separate breakpoint on ``var v`` line.
This breakpoint is actually useless since it is immediately followed by
a breakpoint on evaluation of ``e``, so this CL removes that breakpoint
location.

Similiraly, for let, it used to be that
  for (let v in/of e) ...
became
  for (x' in/of e) { let v; v  = x'; ... }
``let v``generetaed a useless breakpoint (with the location at the
loop's head. This CL removes that breakpoint as well.

R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149043005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28565}
2015-05-21 17:46:45 +00:00
verwaest
4268141ca6 Reland "Mark internal AccessorInfo properties as 'special data properties'"
This reverts commit ac5336baca.

BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1138483005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28442}
2015-05-18 12:36:40 +00:00
machenbach
ac5336baca Revert of Mark internal AccessorInfo properties as "special data properties" (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1123163005/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Blocks current roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1124403007/

Bisection (https://codereview.chromium.org/1142753002/) points to this CL.

Original issue's description:
> Mark internal AccessorInfo properties as "special data properties" to ensure correct strict-mode handling.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/188297160d2b82a4e2a206ebbddfc21dd99a9d8d
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28369}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1142763002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28437}
2015-05-17 16:50:17 +00:00
arv
834a8e9f63 [es6] Iterators and generators should "extend" %IteratorPrototype%
All the builtin iterators as well as the generator objects have an
object called %IteratorPrototype% in the spec between them and
%ObjectPrototype%.

BUG=v8:3568
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1128233008

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28426}
2015-05-15 15:09:38 +00:00
dslomov
0b620ad5e5 Fix test formatting
TBR=arv@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1129713004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28380}
2015-05-12 18:12:54 +00:00
dslomov
30b771a662 Fix the behavior of 'super.foo' assignment when receiver is not an object.
R=arv@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4097
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1132203005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28377}
2015-05-12 17:13:07 +00:00
verwaest
188297160d Mark internal AccessorInfo properties as "special data properties" to ensure correct strict-mode handling.
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1123163005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28369}
2015-05-12 15:11:13 +00:00
conradw
382435480d [es6] Fix symbol comparison on some architectures
https://codereview.chromium.org/1125783002 did not handle all cases for some
architectures. These cases are now covered, and tests have been extended to
check them.

BUG=v8:4073
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1128143002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28266}
2015-05-06 15:04:47 +00:00
dslomov
cf53fed972 Handle the case when derived constructor is [[Call]]ed with 0 args.
ArgumentsAdaptorStub for derived constructor (the one that needs
new.target) works in this way:
 - If the constructor is invoked via the Construct stub, we know that
   actual arguments always include new.target. ``arguments`` object
   however should not include a new.target, therefore we remove it.
   We achieve this by decrementing the argument count.
 - If the constructor is invoked as a call, we do not care for a correct
   ``arguments`` array since the constructor will immediately throw on
   entrance.
The bug is that the call could actually pass 0 actual arguments, but I
decrement unconditionally :(. The fix is to detect this case and avoid
decrementing. ``arguments`` is bogus, but it is ok as constructor
throws.

Long-term we should just remove mucking about with arguments for
new.target and just get it from the stack.

R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:474783
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1126783003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28242}
2015-05-05 19:57:04 +00:00
arv
d26f5d3923 [es6] When comparing two symbols we may need to throw a TypeError
When comparing a symbol to istself using <, <=, > or >= we need to
throw a TypeError. This is correctly handled in the runtime function
so if we are comparing a symbol fall back to use the runtime.

BUG=v8:4073
LOG=Y
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1125783002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28226}
2015-05-05 14:17:46 +00:00
arv
2279dfe789 [es6] Map/Set size getter should have "get size" name
This reverts commit d5565c1f68.

Getter and setter function names in ES6 are defined as "get foo" and
"set foo".

This also moves the logic for handling symbols from runtime-function.cc
to v8natives.js.

BUG=None
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1093183006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28050}
2015-04-24 18:15:59 +00:00
arv
d5565c1f68 Revert of [es6] Map/Set size getter should have "get size" name (patchset #4 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1094323005/)
Reason for revert:
Breaks GCMole ia32

http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20gcmole/builds/1685/steps/GCMole%20ia32/logs/stdio

src/runtime/runtime-function.cc:96:3: warning: Possible problem with evaluation order.
  f->shared()->set_name(*NameToFunctionName(name));
  ^
src/runtime/runtime-function.cc:96:3: warning: Possible problem with evaluation order.
2 warnings generated.

Original issue's description:
> [es6] Map/Set size getter should have "get size" name
>
> Getter and setter function names in ES6 are defined as "get foo" and
> "set foo".
>
> BUG=None
> LOG=N
> R=adamk@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/83c89a2e71a363afb35595f903423e650d788e42
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28034}

TBR=adamk@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=None

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1106713002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28035}
2015-04-23 22:06:27 +00:00
arv
83c89a2e71 [es6] Map/Set size getter should have "get size" name
Getter and setter function names in ES6 are defined as "get foo" and
"set foo".

BUG=None
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1094323005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28034}
2015-04-23 21:56:10 +00:00
arv
d0db1c39ca [es6] Function.prototype.name should be the empty string
ES6 specifies the function name property (it was not part of ES5) and
it specifies the name of Function.prototype to the empty string ("" and
not "Empty"). This makes us match Firefox, Safari and IE developer
preview.

BUG=v8:4033
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1080393004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28021}
2015-04-23 00:29:27 +00:00
dslomov
aec46ca54a Stack allocate lexical locals + hoist stack slots
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/981203003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28008}
2015-04-22 13:22:18 +00:00
arv
79be74364a Fix issues with name and length on poison pill function
In ES6 function name and length are configurable. However, the length
and name properties of the poison pill function must not be
configurable.

BUG=v8:4011
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1061393002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27855}
2015-04-15 17:15:26 +00:00
jkummerow
3eb277f270 %GetOptimizationStatus(): Unconditionally return a sentinel when --always-opt is present
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1086923002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27822}
2015-04-14 14:57:48 +00:00
yangguo
2c01bd34b0 Fix Math.log10 implementation for 1 - Number.EPSILON.
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4025
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1084853002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27815}
2015-04-14 11:56:02 +00:00
arv
186dd69b3a [es6] Fix length property of collection constructors
{Map, Set, WeakMap, WeakSet}.length should be 0.

BUG=v8:4021
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1073233002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27798}
2015-04-13 18:59:39 +00:00
arv
0e539d1ca9 Revert "ES6: Number and Boolean prototype should be ordinary objects"
This reverts commit e965a1f84a.

The reason is that it breaks jsfiddle.com

BUG=476437, v8:4001
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1086673002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27791}
2015-04-13 16:21:00 +00:00
ben
80b7a962b2 Use correct property descriptor in generators test
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1077413002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27771}
2015-04-12 21:18:31 +00:00
mike
0a4881600d Correct property descriptors on GeneratorPrototype
The ES6 specification does not explicitly state the attributes for the
'next' and 'throw' property descriptors, so their values are defined by
Section 17 [1]:

> Every other data property described in clauses 18 through 26 and in
> Annex B.2 has the attributes
> { [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: true }
> unless otherwise specified.

[1]
https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-ecmascript-standard-built-in-objects

BUG=v8:3986
LOG=N
R=wingo,arv

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051363003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27770}
2015-04-11 21:14:20 +00:00
caitpotter88
9836c34dba [es6] do not add caller/arguments to ES6 function definitions
BUG=v8:3946, v8:3982
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1027283004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27729}
2015-04-09 22:40:28 +00:00
caitpotter88
48eff34c32 [es6] don't "replace" Object.prototype.toString for --harmony-tostring
When ObjectToString is installed on Object.prototype twice (once in v8natives.js, and once in harmony-tostring.js), this pollutes old code spaces on some devices. To prevent this, the function is only installed once, preventing test failures when the --harmony-tostring flag is flipped on by default.

BUG=v8:3502
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1072083002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27720}
2015-04-09 20:53:46 +00:00
arv
e965a1f84a ES6: Number and Boolean prototype should be ordinary objects
BUG=v8:4001
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051373002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27680}
2015-04-08 21:18:40 +00:00
mvstanton
af293729ad Tests that carefully checks opt/deopt status shouldn't --always-opt.
If we optimize a function before gathering feedback it may be
peppered with soft deoptimizations. So it can't help but deoptimize.
A judicious reading of the code isn't enough to determine what the
optimization state should be in the face of such chaotic gyrations.

BUG=
R=verwaest@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1069363003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27671}
2015-04-08 15:56:01 +00:00
mike
3b624a1796 Re-implement %Generator% intrinsic as an object
From ES6 25.2.3 ("Properties of the GeneratorFunction Prototype
Object"):

> The GeneratorFunction prototype object is an ordinary object. It is
> not a function object and does not have an [[ECMAScriptCode]] internal
> slot or any other of the internal slots listed in Table 27 or Table
> 56.

Introduce one assertion for the value's type and additional tests for its
properties. Remove an invalid assertion that fails as a result of this
fix.

BUG=v8:3991
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1062633002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27603}
2015-04-06 21:04:51 +00:00
mike
30ea626886 Remove invalid assertion
The removed assertion consistently passes not because the invoked
`close` method internally throws a `TypeError` but because the `close`
method does not exist. The ES6 specification does not define a `close`
method on the GeneratorPrototype, so this test is a tautology.

BUG=None
LOG=N
R=arv

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1046963002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27567}
2015-04-01 15:22:19 +00:00
mike
3badfdcd50 Re-write duplicated assertions
The modified assertions targeted the property descriptor for the
template object's first "cooked" value. The code immediately preceeding
these statements asserts these values.

Update the assertions to instead target the property descriptor for the
template object's first "raw" value (which are otherwise untested).

BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1049523003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27566}
2015-04-01 15:13:21 +00:00
arv
bb21979adf ES6: Unscopable should use ToBoolean
The spec settled on ToBoolean instead of only using not undefined.

BUG=v8:3827
LOG=N
R=adamk

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1045113002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27548}
2015-03-31 15:14:20 +00:00
arv
a373b089e9 Remove --harmony-numeric-literal flag
We have been shipping harmony numeric literals since M41

R=rossberg@chromium.org
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1024603002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27545}
2015-03-31 14:24:30 +00:00
dslomov
15ef61d468 Make sure debugger is ready for breakpoins when we process 'debugger' statement.
On 'debugger' statement, if anything in debugger calls 'EnsureDebugInfo'
on a function, EnsureDebugInfo would compile and substitute code without
debug break slots. This causes weird behavior later when stepping fails
to work (see added test as an example).
This fix is to make sure the debugger is prepared for breakpoints in
that case as well.

Also adds extra testing for bug 468661.

R=yangguo@chromium.org,yurys@chromium.orh
BUG=v8:3990,chromium:468661
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1032353002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27502}
2015-03-27 18:33:17 +00:00
dcarney
d76526032f fix reconfigure of indexed integer exotic objects
R=verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=466084
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037213002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27498}
2015-03-27 10:12:55 +00:00
yangguo
46cc8740a9 Debugger: remove unused JS Debugger API.
R=ulan@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1005053004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27464}
2015-03-26 08:15:45 +00:00
dslomov
49c3a60651 Do not assign positions to parser-generated desugarings.
The root cause for the bug is that the positions assigned to desugared
code was inconsistent with the source ranges of block scopes.
Since the fact that the position is assigned causes the debugger to
break at the parser-generated statement, the fix is to remove positions
from those nodes that we do not want to break on.

The CL also teaches Hydrogen to tolerate these cases.

R=adamk@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:468661
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1032653002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27424}
2015-03-24 17:16:53 +00:00
aandrey
fc1689392e Make debugger step into bound callbacks passed to Array.forEach.
BUG=chromium:450004
R=yangguo@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1030673002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27419}
2015-03-24 16:02:12 +00:00
caitpotter88
6fcc22dce1 [es6] call ToString() on template substitutions
BUG=v8:3980
R=arv@chromium.org
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1027183002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27402}
2015-03-24 12:44:01 +00:00