The reuse of CodeCreateEvent for deopt events caused a CodeCreateEvent
fired twice for a code object. When the event was processed for the first
time it seized the no-fp-ranges from code object, so the second event
had no ranges info leaving code entry without them.
As a result when a cpu profile sample falls into the region it missed the
2nd stack frame.
LOG=N
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/290093005
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21418 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Sampling rate is now calculated as total number of samples divided by profiling time in ms. Before the patch the sampling rate was updated once per 100ms which doesn't have any obvious advantage over the simpler method.
Also we are going to get rid of the profile node self and total time calculation in the v8 CPU profiler and only expose profiling start/end time for CpuProfile and number of ticks on each ProfileNode and let clients do all the math should they need it.
BUG=None
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/21105003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15944 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
1) report line number even if a script has no resource_name (evals);
a) do that for already compiled functions in log.cc;
b) do that for fresh evals in compiler.cc;
2) Implement the test for LineNumbers and make it fast and stable, otherwise we have to wait for tick samples;
a) move processor_->Join() call into new Processor::StopSynchronously method;
b) Process all the CodeEvents even if we are stopping Processor thread;
c) make getters for generator and processor;
3) Fix the test for Jit that didn't expect line numbers;
4) Minor refactoring:
a) in ProcessTicks;
b) rename enqueue_order_ to last_code_event_id_ for better readability;
c) rename dequeue_order_ to last_processed_code_event_id_ and make it a member for better readability;
BUG=
TEST=test-profile-generator/LineNumber
R=jkummerow@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18058008
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15530 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
When current function is FunctionCall builtin we have no reliable way to determine its caller function (in many cases the top of the sampled stack contains address of the caller but sometimes it does not). Instead of dropping the sample or its two top frames we simply mark the caller frame as '(unresolved function)'. It seems like a better approach that dropping whole sample as knowing the top function and the rest of the stack the user should be able to figure out what the caller was.
This change adds builtin id to CodeEntry objects. It will be used later to add similar top frame analysis for FunctionApply and probably other builtins.
BUG=None
TBR=loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18422003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15436 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
When current function is FunctionCall builtin we have no reliable way to determine its caller function (in many cases the top of the sampled stack contains address of the caller but sometimes it does not). Instead of dropping the sample or its two top frames we simply mark the caller frame as '(unresolved function)'. It seems like a better approach that dropping whole sample as knowing the top function and the rest of the stack the user should be able to figure out what the caller was.
This change adds builtin id to CodeEntry objects. It will be used later to add similar top frame analysis for FunctionApply and probably other builtins.
BUG=None
R=jkummerow@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18316004
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15426 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The bodies of methods in ProfilerEventProcessor were moved into CpuProfiler.
Multiple NewCodeEntry methods in CpuProfilesCollection were replaced with one which
simply passes arguments to the CodeEntry constructor.
And CpuProfiler just calls this method when it needs a CodeEntry object.
This NewCodeEntry method is required because CpuProfilesCollection keeps ownership of CodeEntry objects.
BUG=255392
TEST=existing tests
R=yangguo@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18053004
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15405 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
- perform CPU profiler sampling in the sampler thread as we used to;
- skip sampling in the sampling thread if processing thread is running;
- only install SIGPROF handler when CPU profiling is enabled.
BUG=v8:2364
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/11231002
Patch from Sergey Rogulenko <rogulenko@google.com> and Andrey Kosyakov <caseq@chromium.org>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@12985 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The preprocessor defines ENABLE_LOGGING_AND_PROFILING and ENABLE_VMSTATE_TRACKING has been removed as these where required to be turned on for Crankshaft to work. To re-enable reducing the binary size by leaving out heap and CPU profiler a new set of defines needs to be created.
R=ager@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1271
TEST=all
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org//7350014
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8622 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The main issue was due to multiple recompilations of functions. Now
code objects are grouped by function using SFI object address.
JSFunction objects are no longer tracked, instead we track SFI object
moves. To pick a correct code version, we now sample return addresses
instead of JSFunction addresses.
tools/{linux|mac|windows}-tickprocessor scripts differentiate
between code optimization states for the same function
(using * and ~ prefixes introduced earlier).
DevTools CPU profiler treats all variants of function code as
a single function.
ll_prof treats each optimized variant as a separate entry, because
it can disassemble each one of them.
tickprocessor.py not updated -- it is deprecated and will be removed.
BUG=v8/1087,b/3178160
TEST=all existing tests pass, including Chromium layout tests
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6551011
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@6902 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
It turns out they were filtered out. But when I unfiltered them, I
discovered another issue: when DevTools run, regexp literals get
recompiled each time they called (looks like this is concerned with
switching to full compiler), so I ended up having multiple entries for
the same regexp. To fix this, I changed the way of how code entries
equivalence is considered.
BUG=crbug/55999
TEST=cctest/test-profile-generator/ProfileNodeFindOrAddChildForSameFunction
(the test isn't for the whole issue, but rather for equivalence testing)
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/3426008
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@5492 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
As several pages can run in a single V8 instance, it is possible to
have functions from different security contexts intermixed in a single
CPU profile. To avoid exposing function names from one page to
another, filtering is introduced.
The basic idea is that instead of capturing return addresses from
stack, we're now capturing JSFunction addresses (as we anyway work
only with JS stack frames.) Each JSFunction can reach out for
context's security token. When providing a profile to a page, the
profile is filtered using the security token of caller page. Any
functions with different security tokens are filtered out (yes, we
only do fast path check for now) and their ticks are attributed to
their parents.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/2083005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4673 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The simple formula "ms = ticks * sampler_interval" doesn't work,
because e.g. on Linux, the actual sampling rate can be 5 times
lower than the one set up in the code. To calculate actual sampling
rate, current time is periodically queried and processed along with
actual sampling ticks count.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/1539038
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4427 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This is to make possible enabling usage of the new profiling subsystem
in Chromium without much hassle. The idea is pretty simple: unless the
new profiling API is used, all works as usual, as soon as Chromium
starts to use the new API, it will work too.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/1635005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4382 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
In browser (DevTools) mode, only non-native JS code and callbacks are reported.
Also, added "(garbage collector)" entry which accumulates samples count in GC state.
Trying to display "(compiler)" and "(external)" only brings confusion,
because it ends up in displaying scripts code under "(compiler)" node, and DOM
event handlers under "(external)" node, which looks weird.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/1523015
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4357 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
