Functions with Simd128 in their signature will be lowered to 4 Word32.
Later for Int64 lowering, it needs to use the lowered signature.
Otherwise we will have weird parameter and signature mismatch, since it
expects Parameter[1] to be == signature()->GetParam(0).
Bug: v8:10507
Change-Id: Ia9417ecd46c1768344ed1fb3ebfe4e8dd9c3e397
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2432626
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70185}
Changes:
- Add current global index argument to consume_init_expr.
- Inline DecodeGlobalInModule. Move the check for undefined global
indexes into into consume_init_expr. Note: This fixes a bug where the
index wasn't checked for nested global.get.
- Under --experimental-wasm-gc, allow global initializers to reference
already defined globals in the same module.
- Rename ModuleDecoderImpl::DecodeInitExpr -> DecodeInitExprForTesting.
Remove redundant "start" argument.
- Add tests for global initializers. Remove a redundant test.
Bug: v8:7748
Change-Id: Ieb4a768f8cfdd423e5f439bb3467700068f240b7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2428596
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70181}
This CL also adds some unit tests, locally tested under x64.
The double support is based on this original CL by Gus Caplan
(snek@chromium.org):
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2264612
Bug: chromium:1052746
Change-Id: Ibdf631689b01ab619a72005226bfc015b4737dde
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416028
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70168}
These tests were incorrectly declaring the number of parameters the
generated function would take by omitting the receiver and
PopAndReturnVariable was accessing the wrong parameter.
Also updated a passed in parameter to not match the constant that was
being returned in case that led to the test passing accidentally.
Bug: v8:10933
Change-Id: Ia354e4e30b464a333039ab6bc54198acd16a4789
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2434334
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70157}
Fixes test-torque/TestBitFieldStore to read the Smi parameter passed in
rather than the receiver which was always the global object.
Change-Id: Ie6b343ad7ef9393c211b0e7c8e1b7c1427e0aeb4
Bug: v8:10933
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2434327
Auto-Submit: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70154}
When an Isolate in a multi-threaded environment is being debugged
and a thread does a Step Over (StepNext internally) one-shot
breaks are created in the code at the stack frame where the
StepNext occurred. However, if the stepped-over statement had
a function call and the called function (or some function that
it called) unlocked the Isolate (via a C++ function call) and
another thread then locked the Isolate, an ArchiveDebug would
be done which would save the fact that a StepNext is active and
the call frame depth of the StepNext. The one-shot breaks would
then be cleared to avoid stopping the now running thread.
When the original thread that did the StepNext relocks the Isolate,
a RestoreDebug is done which, seeing that a StepNext was active
calls PrepareDebug which assumes that the StepNext must be for
the current JS frame which is usually correct, but not in this
case. This results in the StepNext break actually occurring in the
function that called the C++ function not in the function where
the StepNext was originally done. In addition, the function where
the break now happens must necessarily be deoptimized if
optimized, and debug code and a source map table created if one
doesn't already exists though this is largely invisible to the
user.
Occasionally, a crash/core dump also occurs because the stack
guard is restored after the debugging environment is restored in
the RestoreThread code which can prevent the compiler from being
called to generate the source map table (for the incorrect
function) since the stack guard is another thread's stack guard,
and so might appear that the stack guard has been gone past so
the compiler is not called, resulting in there being no source
map table. But PrepareStep ends up calling the BreakIterator
(via the DebugInfo constructor) which assumes there is a source
map table so we get a crash.
The fix is to have PrepareStep to skip to the frame where the
StepNext was done before doing its thing. Since the only
PrepareStepcaller that requires a frame other than the current
frame, is RestoreDebug, a target frame parameter was added to
PrepareStep that's set by RestoreDebug and defaults to -1
indicating to use the current frame for all other callers.
While this made the order of the debug environment and stack
guard no longer cause an obvious problem, it still felt wrong
to defer restoration of the stack guard until after something
as potentially complex as PrepareStep might be called, so the
order of RestoreDebug and RestoreStackGuard calls were reversed.
Bug: v8:10902
Change-Id: I174e254e72414c827e113aec142f1d329ebe73d8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2405932
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70152}
This fixes the logic in the desugaring of destructuring assignments. In
particular, a spread element would not check if previous `next` results
had already been done, and would always call `next()` again.
Change-Id: I1bd384678722e6cf51c5777fc3b0dd965360291a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2430488
Commit-Queue: Gus Caplan <snek@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70144}
These instructions were changed from "s8x16" to "i8x16" prefixes in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/321.
This CL updates all V8 code, including arch-specific code, to match.
Bug: v8:10946, v8:10933
Change-Id: I26ef9ad77571f94501d42c1d65f57380fd507f3d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2432068
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70143}
This is a reland of 64caf2b0b2
Original change's description:
> [torque] refactor: use -tq only in filenames derived from .tq files
>
> This is to establish a naming rule for Torque-generated files:
> - If the file is called foo/bar-tq..., then it is derived from a
> file foo/bar.tq
> - Otherwise it doesn't belong to a specific .tq file.
>
> So far, we attached -tq to all Torque-generated file names, where it
> sometimes corresponded to a .tq file name and sometimes not.
> It is not necessary to add -tq to file names to indicate that they are
> Torque-generated, since they are already in a directory called
> torque-generated, and we always refer to them as
> "torque-generated/filename", so there is no confusion even though some
> files now have the same name as a corresponding hand-written file, for
> example factory.cc.
>
> TBR: hpayer@chromium.org
> Bug: v8:7793
> Change-Id: Ie172babad1fc7422fd1059c48f5dafaa53e50c8b
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414218
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70060}
Bug: v8:7793
TBR: hpayer@chromium.orgjgruber@chromium.org
Change-Id: I6c492bc64aee1ff167e7ef401825eca9097a7f38
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2431565
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70137}
f32x4->16x8, 64x2->8x16, and 16x8->8x16.
This allows us to pass more spec tests.
Bug: v8:10507
Change-Id: I1810ce2d17f93529b2e69cf5c767cb7b480b4b49
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2429807
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70128}
On ppc64 and s390x, Liftoff is not implemented yet, so if a Liftoff
compilation unit finishes after all top-tier units (hence after the "top
tier finished" callback), it will still increase the turbofan counter.
R=clemensb@chromium.org, ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1092417
Change-Id: I0b99061f26851288f1abb8fcc3a30ca92a55164e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2429564
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Junliang Yan <junyan@redhat.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70123}
This test checks SizeOfObjects after GC, but there might be concurrent
allocations in-between.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: Id904c8865e44ac5c3b486ff6f1316e536cf20e9f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2428864
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70122}
Make sure that tests grow the new space in a safepoint. This fixes
races with concurrent allocation.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I6fce6740bc3c9385f18bbbcde4b06ba881a03635
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2428946
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70120}
Avoid data race by only setting FLAG_local_heaps to true if not
already enabled.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: Ib562b6d525448f5c088da39bf60928debd97db43
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2426610
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70115}
Ensure that events are triggered when a module is decoded, compiled,
instantiated and tiered-up.
This is a reland of Ib5883a338c3756c6f3488fbdd7b6861ecc2ba218.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgTBR=adamk@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1092417
Change-Id: I803ae3db23a5f71f26e8ec118251eccdfc551353
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2425056
Commit-Queue: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70113}
Use Global instead of Persistent such that GlobalHandle is reset at the
end of the function. Persistent doesn't reset in the destructor,
which means that the GC resets the GlobalHandle. With
--stress-concurrent-allocation this might not happen in the test
function itself but when the cctest framework itself works through
the event queue. At that point the Persistent isn't live anymore.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: If77388ad5acb80538852beca0ab22a4ebaf0b5c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2426612
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70111}
This is a first small step for implementing the memory64 proposal:
1. Add a feature flag.
2. Add the 0x04 and 0x05 limits flag for memory64.
3. Read memory limits as LEB-encoded u64 (instead of u32) if a memory64
limit flag was read.
4. Unify {MaximumFlag} and {MemoryFlag}, which was used inconsistently
before.
5. Add test for memory limits encoded with >5 bytes.
6. Move some macros from module-decoder-unittest.cc to wasm-macro-gen.h.
Note that still the same limits for the maximum number of pages applies
as before, i.e. you cannot specify a memory >4GB yet. But you can encode
that small number in >5 bytes.
R=manoskouk@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10949
Change-Id: I90a4f08426ae714a67440281785eb00cfc24a349
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2423712
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70110}
Add lowering for F64x2 in S128Const and converting to and from f64x2.
Bug: v8:10507
Change-Id: Ic2c4f1f41d3dd804e012a943391a46b534864b51
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2424679
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70097}
Ensure that events are triggered when a module is decoded, compiled,
instantiated and tiered-up.
This is a reland of I9dc87957fc03023c5ab1c4f49e865957c8324e1a.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1092417
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ib5883a338c3756c6f3488fbdd7b6861ecc2ba218
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2367866
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70074}
Load and zero extend is still in prototype phase [0], implementing for ARM64 in
order to get more benchmark results.
[0] https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/237
Bug: v8:10713
Change-Id: I7d632324e4bdb0934ab024911201a06b19a1a83d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416407
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70069}
This reverts commit 64caf2b0b2.
Reason for revert: Seems to be causing a failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/38809?
Original change's description:
> [torque] refactor: use -tq only in filenames derived from .tq files
>
> This is to establish a naming rule for Torque-generated files:
> - If the file is called foo/bar-tq..., then it is derived from a
> file foo/bar.tq
> - Otherwise it doesn't belong to a specific .tq file.
>
> So far, we attached -tq to all Torque-generated file names, where it
> sometimes corresponded to a .tq file name and sometimes not.
> It is not necessary to add -tq to file names to indicate that they are
> Torque-generated, since they are already in a directory called
> torque-generated, and we always refer to them as
> "torque-generated/filename", so there is no confusion even though some
> files now have the same name as a corresponding hand-written file, for
> example factory.cc.
>
> TBR: hpayer@chromium.org
> Bug: v8:7793
> Change-Id: Ie172babad1fc7422fd1059c48f5dafaa53e50c8b
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414218
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70060}
TBR=jgruber@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org
Change-Id: I6960fe540861947536c6ddfc0f4887ea80899fae
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7793
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2424486
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70065}
This is to establish a naming rule for Torque-generated files:
- If the file is called foo/bar-tq..., then it is derived from a
file foo/bar.tq
- Otherwise it doesn't belong to a specific .tq file.
So far, we attached -tq to all Torque-generated file names, where it
sometimes corresponded to a .tq file name and sometimes not.
It is not necessary to add -tq to file names to indicate that they are
Torque-generated, since they are already in a directory called
torque-generated, and we always refer to them as
"torque-generated/filename", so there is no confusion even though some
files now have the same name as a corresponding hand-written file, for
example factory.cc.
TBR: hpayer@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7793
Change-Id: Ie172babad1fc7422fd1059c48f5dafaa53e50c8b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414218
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70060}
Otherwise concurrent allocation might start incremental marking, which
would then mark the global handle.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: Ibc681b001847a7c52e9fd8a0420e42a0d0ecfbda
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2424004
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70054}
This reverts commit 4a2b2b2e56.
Reason for revert: Speculative revert due to https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/try/linux-rel/495075?
Original change's description:
> [Heap]: Marking use Jobs.
>
> StopRequest is removed in favor of:
> COMPLETE_TASKS_FOR_TESTING -> JoinForTesting()
> PREEMPT_TASKS -> Pause()
> COMPLETE_ONGOING_TASKS now has the same behavior as PREEMPT_TASKS
> - we should avoid waiting on the main thread as much as possible.
>
> Change-Id: Icceeb4f0c0fda2ed234b2f26fe308b11410fcfb7
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2376166
> Commit-Queue: Etienne Pierre-Doray <etiennep@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70037}
TBR=ulan@chromium.org,etiennep@chromium.org
Change-Id: I63f24bffa0f56c6ffa1d1977fc4fb8a76b6f3ba2
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2423722
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70049}
Added scopes to diallow/allow GCs from happening using a DCHECK. It is
stricter than DisallowHeapAllocation, since this also doesn't allow
safepoints.
As soon as Turbofan is ready, we can replace all usages of
DisallowHeapAllocation with DisallowGarbageCollection.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I12c144ec099d9af57d692ff343adbe7aec46c0c7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2362960
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70042}
Building and running tests with v8_enabled_concurrent_marking=false
currently produces two failures:
1) Segmentation fault on attempt to mark a read-only object.
This is fixed by changing MarkBit::Set to be a no-op if the object
is already marked (which is the case for the readonly space).
2) Missing write-barrier due to bogus condition in the bailout.
The barrier can be skipped only if the host object is not marked yet.
This also disables two concurrent allocation tests that rely on
concurrent marking write-barrier.
Bug: v8:10875
Change-Id: Ib3a238fc34c8f20c697470e0bd4ac427fb4bdc0e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2421816
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70041}
StopRequest is removed in favor of:
COMPLETE_TASKS_FOR_TESTING -> JoinForTesting()
PREEMPT_TASKS -> Pause()
COMPLETE_ONGOING_TASKS now has the same behavior as PREEMPT_TASKS
- we should avoid waiting on the main thread as much as possible.
Change-Id: Icceeb4f0c0fda2ed234b2f26fe308b11410fcfb7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2376166
Commit-Queue: Etienne Pierre-Doray <etiennep@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70037}
Avoid resetting log flags as this could cause data races with
allocating background threads.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I7be01ff54e349652f182b944ed3f3366d1239ad7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2421814
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70036}
Test was asserting heap size before and after GC. With background
thread allocation those assertions might not hold.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I4f8c0f6d0b80040b3c89f85e801416abb29ed30e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2421999
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70034}
Assertions are implemented with the new ASSERTION instruction. The nfa
interpreter evaluates the assertion based on the current context in the
subject string every time a thread executes ASSERTION. This is
analogous to what re2 and rust/regex do.
Alternatives to this approach:
- The interpreter could calculate eagerly for all assertion types
whether they are satisfied whenever the current input position is
advanced. This would make evaluating the ASSERTION instruction itself
cheaper, but at the cost of making every advance in the input string
more expensive. I suspect this would be slower on average because
assertions are not that common that we typically evaluate >= 2
assertions at every input position.
- Assertions in a regexp could be desugared into CONSUME_RANGE
instructions, so that no new instruction would be necessary. For
example, the word boundary assertion \b is satisfied at a given
position/state if we have just consumed a word character and will
consume a non-word character next, or vice-versa. The tricky part
about this is that the assertion itself should not consume input, so
we'd have to split (automaton) states according to whether we've
arrived at them via a word character or not. The current compiler is
not really equipped for this kind of transformation. For {start,end}
of {line,file} assertions, we'd need to introduce dummy characters
indicating start/end of input (say, 0x10000 and 0x10001) which we feed
to the interpreter before respectively after the actual input.
I suspect that this approach wouldn't make much of a difference for
NFA execution. It would likely speed up (lazy) DFA execution though
because assertions would be dealt with in the fast path.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_fyi_rel_ng
Bug: v8:10765
Change-Id: Ic2012c943e0ce54eb8662789fb3d4c1b6cd8d606
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398644
Commit-Queue: Martin Bidlingmaier <mbid@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70026}
When a compaction space allocates a new code page, that pages needs to
be added to the Isolate::code_pages_ array used for stack unwinding.
Since the array is owned by the main thread, compaction thread cannot
directly modify it. Because of that code pages are added upon merging
of the compaction space to the main space in MergeLocalSpace.
The bug was that all code pages coming from the compaction space
were added to the code_pages_ array. However, some of the pages are
not newly allocated but merely borrowed from the main space.
This CL keeps track of all newly allocated paged by a compaction space.
Bug: v8:10900
Change-Id: Iff3ff5d608df60fb752d2e0ffc29e51f2d967936
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2418718
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70023}
Since the flag is enabled by default, it is more useful to have the
reverse implications so that disabling the flag is guaranteed to work.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I191c35682442925f3fed691460d074ba6715fc99
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2409498
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70022}
For js frame, we want to display currently executing function.
Change-Id: If33b04279dafdf6e4834bfb6c7240e8e7e799fc7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2411483
Reviewed-by: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70018}
Changes:
- Rename IsSignatureEqual -> MatchesSignature for consistency
- Add WasmInstanceObject field to WasmTableObject.
- Improve some error messages related to tables in
function-body-decoder-impl.h.
- Introduce WasmTable::IsValidTableType. Use it wherever appropriate.
- Overload equality operators in HeapType to work with
HeapType::Representation.
- Rename DynamicTypeCheckRef -> TypecheckJSObject.
- Handle WasmCapiFunctions in TypecheckJSObject.
- Use TypecheckJSObject in WasmTableObject::IsValidElement.
- A few more minor improvements.
Bug: v8:9495
Change-Id: I2867dd3486d7c31717ac26b87a50e15cf2b898be
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416491
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70001}
This reverts commit 8b60d8fcbf.
Reason for revert: Flaky on windows: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Win32%20-%20debug/27302
Original change's description:
> Reland "[cpu-profiler] Log OSR code when starting the profiler"
>
> This is a reland of f696528189
>
> Updated the test:
> 1. Set profiling interval to 100us to get 10x the samples
> 2. Guarantee we spend at least 1ms per iteration, instead of only
> bailing out if we spend more than 1ms. This gives us enough samples on
> release mode.
> 3. Increase the time spent profiling optimized code by 50% to make sure
> we have a big enough difference.
>
> With 1000 iterations I didn't see any flakes locally so this looks solid
> now.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [cpu-profiler] Log OSR code when starting the profiler
> >
> > OSR code doesn't hang off any JSFunction or SFI, so we missed it when
> > starting up the profiler. This meant we didn't properly attribute
> > ticks to SFI code. The ticks ended up going to the caller instead.
> >
> > There is a weak cache of OSR code per native context, so iterate that
> > on profiler startup and log all the code objects.
> >
> > Change-Id: I2e9738b86a488b37f36ac89803561607dc76f745
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414216
> > Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69964}
>
> Change-Id: Ib506e88b546008e462967259763bbf985b74b462
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2418092
> Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69990}
TBR=mythria@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org,dinfuehr@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ie3272c4fd297ca6f10a47c3fe8826e226a9f0545
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2418714
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69999}
This reverts commit af5f437cd9.
Reason for revert: Seems to break TSAN - https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN/33286?
Original change's description:
> [heap] Fix tracking of code pages for V8 stack unwinder
>
> When a compaction space allocates a new code page, that pages needs to
> be added to the Isolate::code_pages_ array used for stack unwinding.
> Since the array is owned by the main thread, compaction thread cannot
> directly modify it. Because of that code pages are added upon merging
> of the compaction space to the main spage in MergeLocalSpace.
>
> The bug was that all code pages coming from the compaction space
> were added to the code_pages_ array. However, some of the pages are
> not newly allocated but merely borrowed from the main space.
>
> This CL introduces a new page flag for marking pages that are borrowed
> during compaction and skips them in MergeLocalSpace.
>
> Bug: v8:10900
> Change-Id: I786dc5747bd7c785ae58dfd8b841c00774efb15e
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416500
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69992}
TBR=ulan@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,dinfuehr@chromium.org
Change-Id: I13f8b64014750af95423166152dc9bee8cec12d0
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10900
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2418395
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69993}
When a compaction space allocates a new code page, that pages needs to
be added to the Isolate::code_pages_ array used for stack unwinding.
Since the array is owned by the main thread, compaction thread cannot
directly modify it. Because of that code pages are added upon merging
of the compaction space to the main spage in MergeLocalSpace.
The bug was that all code pages coming from the compaction space
were added to the code_pages_ array. However, some of the pages are
not newly allocated but merely borrowed from the main space.
This CL introduces a new page flag for marking pages that are borrowed
during compaction and skips them in MergeLocalSpace.
Bug: v8:10900
Change-Id: I786dc5747bd7c785ae58dfd8b841c00774efb15e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416500
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69992}
