The preprocessor defines ENABLE_LOGGING_AND_PROFILING and ENABLE_VMSTATE_TRACKING has been removed as these where required to be turned on for Crankshaft to work. To re-enable reducing the binary size by leaving out heap and CPU profiler a new set of defines needs to be created.
R=ager@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1271
TEST=all
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org//7350014
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8622 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
o The thread local state in an isolate has to be initialized before
it's used.
o v8::Locker was incorrectly tracking whether it's the topmost one.
o Waking the profiler thread on shutdown should not leave the
semaphore counter in an inconsitent state.
R=fschneider@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1522
TEST=cctest/test-lockers/Regress1433
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7309013
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8537 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Lots of web pages have really frequently firing timers that keep the
profiler thread spinning if we require a period of JS inactivity
before suspending the profiler. While it's possible to throttle it by
increasing the sleep delay and adjusting the duration of the required
inactive period, it seemed much simpler to just stop it immediately on
exiting JS.
Stopping the profiler this way effectively turned off two optimization
heuristics: 1) eager optimization (it's reset on waking up the
profiler and now the profiler wakes up much more frequently) and 2)
optimization throttling based on JS to non-JS state ratio (the ratio
is now 100%). I removed these two heuristics and found no performance
regressions so far.
R=ager@chromium.org
BUG=crbug.com/77625
TEST=none
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7274024
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8472 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
While trying to fix Mac and Windows versions for this change:
http://codereview.chromium.org/6771047/, I figured out, that we
already store an isolate in StackFrameIterator, so we can use it in
frame objects, instead of requiring it from caller.
I've changed iterators usage to the following scheme: whenever a
caller maintains an isolate pointer, it just passes it to stack
iterator, and no more worries about passing it to frame content
accessors. If a caller uses current isolate, it can omit passing it
to iterator, in this case, an iterator will use the current isolate,
too.
There was a special case with LiveEdit, which creates
detached copies of frame objects.
R=vitalyr@chromium.org
BUG=none
TEST=none
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6794019
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@7499 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
files. On ARM it is not enough to iterate the relocation information
because that will only give us access to the constant pool and not to
the place in the instruction stream where the target in the constant
pool is called.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6343005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@6444 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
