Previously, Function("++f`...`) would not throw an exception until the
created function was called. Now, it throws an early ReferenceError.
This change matches the behaviour in JavaScriptCore and SpiderMonkey.
Ordinary calls such as Function("++f()") are still thrown at runtime,
also compatible with JavaScriptCore and SpiderMonkey.
BUG=v8:4480, v8:6910
R=marja@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
Change-Id: If31c6d360a0464744eff5d8dd377ebff184ae00e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/712794
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48553}
This flag allows invalid escape sequences in tagged templates, which is
a stage-4 TC39 proposal shipping in other browsers.
Bug: v8:5546
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: I3e7c374c9b547f62d5976f76a7208d05fe9decf8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/581885
Commit-Queue: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47584}
(Reland: NeedsManualRebaseline'd newly-fixed layout test in Chromium.)
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings
or templates when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were
only enforcing that it not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape
sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2948903002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46106}
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings or templates
when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were only enforcing that it
not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2950633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46046}
There's no need to mark these as possibly-direct-eval, since all such an
eval-tagged string will ever get passed is the array of string parts, which
will be immediately returns (since it's not a string). It will
never do a lookup in the current scope, nor (in sloppy mode) introduce
new declarations.
This patch is not intended to change behavior, but I've added tests that
demonstrate the stuff explained in the preceding paragraph.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1580463003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33245}
The modified assertions targeted the property descriptor for the
template object's first "cooked" value. The code immediately preceeding
these statements asserts these values.
Update the assertions to instead target the property descriptor for the
template object's first "raw" value (which are otherwise untested).
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1049523003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27566}
