Currently, the generic wrapper is used for i32 and i64 params and 0 or 1
i32, i64, f32, f64 return value.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I610172995457354879afd3c9c2c6c2d55c2b700f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414219
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70090}
Changes:
- When checking if a table is a function table, check for subtyping to
funcref instead of equality.
- Add WasmModuleObject argument to GetFunctionTableEntry.
- Implement WasmTableObject::Get/Set for all legal table types.
- Factor out SetFunctionTableEntry from WasmTableObject::Set.
- Write unittests and JS tests.
Bug: v8:9495
Change-Id: I4f0c7a7013f17c561afb3039c5e0811634a4d313
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416387
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70032}
Changes:
- Rename IsSignatureEqual -> MatchesSignature for consistency
- Add WasmInstanceObject field to WasmTableObject.
- Improve some error messages related to tables in
function-body-decoder-impl.h.
- Introduce WasmTable::IsValidTableType. Use it wherever appropriate.
- Overload equality operators in HeapType to work with
HeapType::Representation.
- Rename DynamicTypeCheckRef -> TypecheckJSObject.
- Handle WasmCapiFunctions in TypecheckJSObject.
- Use TypecheckJSObject in WasmTableObject::IsValidElement.
- A few more minor improvements.
Bug: v8:9495
Change-Id: I2867dd3486d7c31717ac26b87a50e15cf2b898be
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416491
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70001}
Changes:
- Extend IsJSCompatibleSignature to include typed functions.
- Generalize WasmIsValidFuncRefValue to WasmIsValidRefValue, utilize
DynamicTypeCheckRef. Use it in FromJS.
- Extend DynamicTypeCheckRef to eqRef type and WasmJSFunction
references.
- Update call-ref.js test.
Change-Id: I71166ab8c1e716c21e79776c561e77b443add1da
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2412527
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69981}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes compared to last reland:
- Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a
computed property.
- Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag.
- Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant.
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
Currently, the generic wrapper is used for i32 and i64 params and 0 or 1
i32 and i64 return value.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I4b592d7e0e4ebcb3455520c094c92bf4177c5a5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2412179
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69920}
Check that a v128 imported global in a Wasm module is initialized with a
WebAssembly.Global object.
This is technically impossible, because creating WebAssembly.Global of
type v128 is an error, and creating one of any other type is a type
mismatch. However, we still need this check to avoid hitting an
unreachable case when setting the value of the global later on.
Also, this is not a validation error, since the v128 restriction is only
a Web/JS limitation. Other embedders can choose to do something
different with this module with an imported v128 global.
Bug: chromium:1127740
Change-Id: I6d444578c082b6b1c353cfa2fd82bb42eb14fc3b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2410659
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69919}
Global.set requires a write barrier. This write barrier was missing in
the original CL. The reland only adds the write barrier for ia32, and
bails out on the other platforms.
Original message:
With this CL we add support for all externref globals except for
imported mutable globals.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org, ulan@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I86328a17200d1edc505f4c4357bdf795d95cf0c8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2404777
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69912}
Changes:
- Add optional WasmModuleObject field to WasmGlobalObject
- Introduce DynamicTypeCheckRef. Use it to typecheck imported global
objects.
- Correctly typecheck imported WasmGlobalObjects.
- Add some testing infrastructure and one test file
Bug: v8:7748
Change-Id: Icc62d378d17696c5808d580f1ec84186c9556ec1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2403248
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69872}
Currently, the generic wrapper is used for i32 and i64 params and 0 or 1
i32 return value.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I8c47e78fa9beeda01bdb647e1fcf9ebe6baf1ee4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2403243
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69849}
The emitted safepoint entries had the wrong size, because it did not
contain StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. The code still
worked because the indices of encoded in the entries where too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp and thereby corrected
the invalid size. It worked as follows:
First the stack_slots_size gets calculated from the safepoint entry.
Then the position of a stack slot was
"frame_header_base + stack_slots_size - index * pointer_size", where
"index" is what is encoded in the safepoint map. Because of the incorrect
encoding, both stack_slot_size and index were too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. Therefore the errors in
both values eliminated each other, making the end result correct.
With --print-code, the safepoint entry size was also read, and it
crashed because the encoded value was too low.
The reland fixes the indices.
Original message:
With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
externref.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I88444e57745d7b9fe8f1630e904d49736fa9d720
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398531
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69786}
This reverts commit 10348e8eb6.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/1125951
Original change's description:
> [wasm][liftoff] Emit safepoints for externref values on the stack
>
> With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
> value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
> locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
> externref.
>
> R=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:7581
> Change-Id: I2df0a8d00b2da33fe06ff474b039cca4c7be726d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387571
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69725}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,thibaudm@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4cdf7fedfc91cd99302d5cb05e242dbb032c5803
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7581
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398529
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69754}
With this CL we add support for all externref globals except for
imported mutable globals.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I63cb26f8ad6f4b8fc1c276e223c5d45745122ebf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396086
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69741}
The parameters should be processed and evaluated in an increasing order
(starting with the 1st param).
Before we started with the last (n-th) parameter which was not correct.
Bug: v8:10701, chromium:1124940
Change-Id: I8e0d8b1f0c53832c8f2d09551879c1a4413e1598
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396085
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69739}
With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
externref.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I2df0a8d00b2da33fe06ff474b039cca4c7be726d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387571
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69725}
The generic wrapper can be used for Wasm functions with int32 parameters
and 0 or 1 int32 return values.
Added tests for cases when the return value can & cannot be converted to
a Smi.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I470954ed0aced0e4ec6e65a9f38caac19c576549
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2390141
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69700}
The generic wrapper can be used for Wasm functions with int32 parameters
and no return values.
Changed the GC scanning for the generic wrapper.
Added tests for cases when all the parameters of the Wasm function fit
into registers and when some of the parameters are on the top of the
stack.
Change-Id: I511fd04d2a4a2bdc4a6f72d72e2867a03b256f6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381459
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69645}
In order to improve our tiering strategy, it is a good idea to start
by tiering up functions that will be used the most, as this is done in
most JavaScript engines.
To decide which function requires tiering, we use as a basic strategy
to define its compilation priority to 'func_size * number_of_calls',
this roughly approximates the time we spend in the function.
To handle prioritization, it seemed that using a concurrent
priority queue similar to BigUnits was causing concurrencies issues.
I then decided to use different priority queues for each worker thread.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I6f314468549000b2a9b51d3d470f04a0cb997879
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2367859
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69585}
Load extends always load 8 bytes, so the access size does not depend on
MachineType of the load. The MachineType is used for classifying the
lane shape of the 8-byte load.
Also add cctest to load splats and load extends to test OOB. (Note that
load splats access size depends on MachineType).
Add regression test from clusterfuzz, minimized by ahaas@. Remove the
`--no-wasm-trap-handler` flag since we have a no_wasm_traps variant that
should test this flag.
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I27ba051d0536ca0f6fd75dd641ca9b78132dafed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2363291
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69489}
The V8 wasm fuzzer can create regression tests for failing fuzzer cases.
These regression tests use the wasm-module-builder.js. With the addition
of simd to the wasm-compile-fuzzer, the fuzzer can now create test cases
that use simd instructions, but the wasm-module-builder.js did not know
yet about the new instructions. This CL adds some instructions to
wasm-module-builder.js.
R=zhin@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I198e4f11c2225a65d6b438f95e351fc14ee66218
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2362694
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69467}
GC support works for the current 0 and 1 param version
of the wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I9e3822b1481223c44050d23ddee7293936f1e6d4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2351673
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69447}
In Liftoff, we were missing kS128 cases to load to/from stack.
For the x64 and ARM64 instruction selector, the calculation of
reverse_slot is incorrect for 128-bit values:
- reverse_slot += 2 (size of 128-bit values, 2 pointers)
- this copies from slot -2 into register
- but the value starts at slot -1, it occupies slots -1 and -2
- we end up copying slot -2 (most significant half) of the register, and
also slot -3, which is where rsi was store (Wasm instance addr)
- the test ends up with a different result every time
The calculation of reverse_slot is changed to follow how ia32 and ARM
does it, which is to start with
- reverse_slot = 0
- in the code-generator, add 1 to the slot
- then after emitting Peek operation, reverse_slot += 2
The fixes for x64 and ARM64 are in both instruction-selector and
code-generator.
ia32 and ARM didn't support writing kSimd128 values yet, it was only a
missing check in code-generator, so add that in.
For ARM, the codegen is more involved, vld1 does not support addressing
with an offset, so we have to do the addition into a scratch register.
Also adding a test for returning multiple v128. V128 is not exposed to
JavaScript, so we use a Wasm function call, and then an involved chain
of extract lanes, returning 6 i32 which we verify the values of. It
extracts the first and last lane of the i32x4 value in order to catch
bugs where we write or read to a wrong stack slot (off by 1).
The simd-scalar-lowering for kCall was only handling single s128 return,
we adopt the way i64-lowering handles kCall, so that is can now handle
any kinds of calls with s128 in the descriptor.
Bug: v8:10794
Bug: chromium:1115230
Change-Id: I2ccdd55f6292bc5794be78053b27e14da8cce70e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2355189
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69439}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TurboFan generates significantly less code than Liftoff for this test,
and depending on timing it can happen that we need to generate thousands
of functions, which takes some time and occasionally runs into timeouts.
Thus disable tier-up for this test, such that we stick with the much
longer Liftoff code, and reach the four separate code spaces quicker.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8e9a0cb466c1bdfef29aceeb5dd31aa96d05b70b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352490
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69369}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
This is a reland of 60ee70bb40.
The wasm c-api flakes were fixed in https://crrev.com/c/2349293.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I2a7c1429812ca46d88a2902b8e0a7b7e3d638b56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349290
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69335}
A new field for signature type was added to WasmExportedFunctionData.
It is set to 0 or 1 depending on the parameter count.
(It's set and being used only in 0 and 1 parameter cases.)
Added new JS tests for 1 parameter wasm functions.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I349d881a2860f1a50b91e08d0126ca71c5f6483b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339622
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69302}
This reverts commit 60ee70bb40.
Reason for revert: wasm-api-tests/WasmCapiTest.Serialize starts flaking: https://crbug.com/v8/10784
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic1349375bd562bb0a2724c39c27ef3247461c97b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342845
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69284}
We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
(debugging, dynamic tiering).
This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
enabling the debugger.
Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
We used to check the size of tables at compile time, and threw a
CompilationError if a given size exceeded the implementation-defined
limit. However, the spec defines that an error should only be thrown
when the implementation-defined limit is reached, which is either at
instantiation time of during runtime at a table.grow.
With this CL the V8 implementation becomes spec compliant in this
regard.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I7d0e688b385a65e4060a569e5ab1dec68947ceea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2326331
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69267}
This test uses a i64x2.shr_s to shift a v128 with all bits set by 1,
resulting in v128 with all bits set (no change). This value is then
dropped, and param[2] (3), is returned.
Without the fix, -1 is returned, since i64x2.shr_s overwrites the
register for param[2] with 0xffffffff.
Bug: v8:10752
Bug: chromium:1111522
Change-Id: I0310bf6039be780a6738689069cdbcfa3a24bbdb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2335779
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69233}
This generic wrapper builtin is currently used only when the wasm
function has no parameters and no return value.
Added a new V8 flag to use this generic wrapper.
Also added a JS test function for this generic wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: Id8cd1771f26922927363b715d8a6ffd384a143ce
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2307240
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69097}
Using uint8_t[] causes decay to pointer issue, which manifests in
copying garbage values in the call to WriteLittleEndianValue. Change it
to use a std::array, which doesn't have the decaying behavior.
Also add a regression test from comment#6 of the linked bug.
Bug: v8:10731
Change-Id: I4a1ca69fe99806642e9931625ca7aeab6663f955
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2316465
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69052}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
On desktop systems, we use a very basic tiering strategy: Everything is
initially compiled with Liftoff, and once that is done, the module can
start being used. Concurrently to the execution, we re-compile all code
with TurboFan, and hot-swap each function once TurboFan finishes.
We should start using a more dynamic strategy where each function is
tiered-up when judged necessary. This change will then tier-up each
liftoff function once it has been called 5 times.
I then added a counter in the native module, that is updated directly
from Liftoff code, and a runtime call is then made when the counter
reaches the goal.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I8dc2b02fdff8d97781bb1cf496886594b3d7f644
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2306803
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68971}
The CanTailCall check only passes if the return locations are the
same in the caller and the callee. However, stack returns are expected
to be at a different offset depending on the stack space reserved for
parameters.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7431
Change-Id: Iaac15fce889d6cd7d1ac88f320a872202281fb5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2289789
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68933}
It seems that the mix of atomic and non-atomic updates to the same
memory location is not working correctly. One fix is changing all memory
updates to be atomic. Another fix is removing the non-atomic access that
happens while the workers are already running (using atomic accesses).
This CL implements the latter.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10647, v8:10650
Change-Id: I84b4f3f442b6be3c4ea6e51962a523f443f5e43b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2273133
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68603}
