Previously to this commit only quantifiers of the form /<x>*/, i.e.
arbitrarily often greedy repetition, were implemented. Now a much
larger class is supported, e.g. + and ? and their non-greedy variants.
Because it came up repeatedly during the implementation, the commit also
adds the Label and DeferredLabel classes to patch JMP and FORK target
addresses more easily.
Still not supported are the following quantifiers:
- Possessive quantifiers, where I'm not entirely sure whether they could
be implemented in principle. Re2 doesn't support them.
- Quantifiers with large but finite numbers for min and max numbers of
repetitions, as in e.g. /<x>{9000, 90000}/. These are currently
limited to some small value. This is because the body of such
repetitions is unrolled explicitly, so the size of the bytecode is
linear in the number of repetitions.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_fyi_rel_ng
Bug: v8:10765
Change-Id: Id04d893252588abb0f80c3cb33cfc707f6601ea0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387575
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69759}
This reverts commit 10348e8eb6.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/1125951
Original change's description:
> [wasm][liftoff] Emit safepoints for externref values on the stack
>
> With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
> value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
> locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
> externref.
>
> R=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:7581
> Change-Id: I2df0a8d00b2da33fe06ff474b039cca4c7be726d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387571
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69725}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,thibaudm@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4cdf7fedfc91cd99302d5cb05e242dbb032c5803
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7581
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398529
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69754}
With this CL we add support for all externref globals except for
imported mutable globals.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I63cb26f8ad6f4b8fc1c276e223c5d45745122ebf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396086
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69741}
The parameters should be processed and evaluated in an increasing order
(starting with the 1st param).
Before we started with the last (n-th) parameter which was not correct.
Bug: v8:10701, chromium:1124940
Change-Id: I8e0d8b1f0c53832c8f2d09551879c1a4413e1598
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396085
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69739}
An earlier cl:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2354810 fixed loading
double fields with dynamic map checks. The fix however didn't update the
expected type information to also expect Smi fields. So, in the later
optimization phases the CheckHeapObject operation was reduced to a NoP
since the expected type was a HeapObject. This cl fixes the bug by
updating the type to Type::Any.
Bug: chromium:1124696, v8:10582
Change-Id: Ic96dd74c97caf8eaf5289d8e8939f6feb1686a57
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396088
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69730}
With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
externref.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I2df0a8d00b2da33fe06ff474b039cca4c7be726d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387571
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69725}
This reverts commit 95aa697b2f.
Reason for revert: breaks under tsan
Original change's description:
> [test][d8] Add d8.log.getAndStop helper
>
> The new helper function allows us to write tests for log parsing
> without the need to first generating a log file. This makes it easier
> to spot errors when the log format changes.
>
> - Add d8 global variable
> - Add file_name accessor to Logger and Log classes
> - Change OS::LogFileOpenMode to w+ / wb+
> - Use separate Log::WriteLogHeader method
> - Remove unused logger_ instance variable from Log
>
> Bug: v8:10644
> Change-Id: Ifc7e35aa4e91b3f01f0847843263946e085944c3
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387563
> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69715}
TBR=mlippautz@chromium.org,cbruni@chromium.org,gsathya@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
Change-Id: Iad47d2f1e3391cae3c2f8c9e6c904c43925e1671
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10644
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396080
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69717}
The new helper function allows us to write tests for log parsing
without the need to first generating a log file. This makes it easier
to spot errors when the log format changes.
- Add d8 global variable
- Add file_name accessor to Logger and Log classes
- Change OS::LogFileOpenMode to w+ / wb+
- Use separate Log::WriteLogHeader method
- Remove unused logger_ instance variable from Log
Bug: v8:10644
Change-Id: Ifc7e35aa4e91b3f01f0847843263946e085944c3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387563
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69715}
The generic wrapper can be used for Wasm functions with int32 parameters
and 0 or 1 int32 return values.
Added tests for cases when the return value can & cannot be converted to
a Smi.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I470954ed0aced0e4ec6e65a9f38caac19c576549
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2390141
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69700}
There is an int version that will be TNodified in a follow-up CL.
Bug: v8:9708, v8:6949
Change-Id: I3a47cb352396dfe9dea426b6396216c06e0e3254
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387963
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69695}
Due to the way SSE flags work, we need to enable all versions prior to
SSE 4.1 as well.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I50ddd3f486641e7bf22c651fc2c9a8a4ccbc2b46
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391325
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69687}
With https://crrev.com/c/2389982 we are now forcing the sse flag in this
test, so we no longer need the flag check. Keep it around for the other
archs.
The nosse41 condition will be removed from the test runner in the next
patch.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I7eacb21803e6cc810384d3e4881d2a965dc1ad69
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391320
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69684}
Previously we checked whether a thread's pc IsPcProcessed before pushing
to the stack of (postponed) active_threads_. This commit moves the
IsPcProcessed check and corresponding MarkPcProcessed call to when the
thread is actually processed, i.e. when it is popped from the
active_threads_ stack again.
This fixes two issues:
- Consider what used to happen in the following scenario:
1. An active thread t is postponed (e.g. because it is a fork) and
pushed on active_threads_. IsPcProcessed(t.pc) is false, so t is
not discarded and does actually end up on active_threads_.
2. Some other thread s is executed, and at some point s.pc == t.pc,
i.e. t.pc is marked as processed.
3. t is popped from active_threads_ for processing.
In 3 we don't want to continue execution of t: After all, its pc is
already marked as processed. But because previously we only checked
for IsPcProcessed in step 1 before pushing to active_threads_, we used
to continue execution in 3. I don't think this is a correctness
issue, but possibly a performance problem. In any case, this commit
moves the IsPcProcessed check from 1 to 3 and so fixes this.
- After flushing blocked_threads_, we push them to active_threads_
again. While doing so, we used to mark these thread's pcs as processed.
This meant that sometimes a (fork of a) high priority thread was
cancelled by the IsPcProcessed check even though its pc was only
marked as processed by a thread with lower priority during flushing.
We need it to be the other way round: The low priority thread should
be cancelled after its pc is processed by a thread with higher
priority.
With this commit we don't MarkPcProcessed during flushing, it's
postponed to when we're actually processing. This was a correctness
issue, and there's a new corresponding test case.
Bug: v8:10765
Change-Id: Ie12682cf3f8a04222d907edd8a3ad25baa69465a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2388112
Commit-Queue: Martin Bidlingmaier <mbid@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69668}
The test is incompatible with --noenable-sse4-1, which is randomly
added by numfuzz (and possibly other fuzzers).
The "Flags" from the test files are always passed last and are often
used to neuter incompatible flags.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I8fd11b4d38586f25f5af63ab8ef83873dc250557
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2389982
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69665}
For TypedArray, a fast path is used when using the builtin iterator, and
next method has not been overriden. If we use that fast path for JSArray
too, the method will be about 200x times faster on a large array.
This patch also fixes a bug when a typed array is modified during the
mapper execution. In that case, the modification should not be taken
into account.
Bug: v8:10802
Change-Id: I74e2cbcd6a654def318585b4e08745037584669a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2358749
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Renevier <arenevier@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69655}
With a recent change, we require WebAssembly code to be tiered up to
serialize it, see https://crrev.com/c/2349290. In that CL tests were
adjusted to set the --wasm-tier-up flag when serialization was involved.
However, the test adjusted in this CL was missing, because this test
used the kExprRefNull instruction, which caused a bailout to TurboFan
anyways. With recent changes, Liftoff can compile kExprRefNull now,
and therefore causes problems.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10852
Change-Id: I9b89f37c22f17cbf046110f3ee1c98bfea73e009
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387574
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69648}
The generic wrapper can be used for Wasm functions with int32 parameters
and no return values.
Changed the GC scanning for the generic wrapper.
Added tests for cases when all the parameters of the Wasm function fit
into registers and when some of the parameters are on the top of the
stack.
Change-Id: I511fd04d2a4a2bdc4a6f72d72e2867a03b256f6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381459
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69645}
This regression test does not work on MIPS without SIMD since the scalar
lowering is not complete yet. Skip it for now.
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Icc407488a96d4c965c1cf956f7a74abde078d421
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2385855
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69626}
This CL adds support for disjunctions and some quantification in
EXPERIMENTAL regexp patterns. It is implemented using a new bytecode
format and an NFA-based breadth-first interpreter.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10765
Change-Id: Idd49a3bbc9a9fcc2be80d822c9d84a638e53e777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2370634
Commit-Queue: Martin Bidlingmaier <mbid@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69621}
The graph assembler calls MergeControlToEnd as part of Unreachable
node creation; this causes issues when used inside the GraphReducer
framework, since the reducer is not notified by gasm that the end node
should be revisited.
The (hacky) fix in this CL is to always mark the end node for
revisitation after a gasm reduction has taken place.
Bug: v8:8888,chromium:1123379
Change-Id: I350bb7144add04a0c3fd7f3d88c07fcfe1cd42e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2384772
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69619}
A recent unrelated change caused these tests to get unlucky in
GC stress mode. Their "assertOptimized" expectations rely on
certain type feedback data not getting flushed at the wrong time.
Bug: v8:10846
Change-Id: I86d0b0c049539e4a69aa764cc6ec92465ca12beb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381458
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69617}
For SIMD instructions that use aligned moves (like movaps or movapd), we
don't have correct memory alignment for SIMD moves yet. Switch to to
movupd.
Bug: v8:9198
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Ic60fba5d08dda9676f6091ce505ac7be54957d00
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2380240
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69613}
Those globals must have type float instead of int to preserve the sign
bit.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1069173
Change-Id: I9769f47f087aaba94a6172118be44f70adeded0c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2379861
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69609}
In order to improve our tiering strategy, it is a good idea to start
by tiering up functions that will be used the most, as this is done in
most JavaScript engines.
To decide which function requires tiering, we use as a basic strategy
to define its compilation priority to 'func_size * number_of_calls',
this roughly approximates the time we spend in the function.
To handle prioritization, it seemed that using a concurrent
priority queue similar to BigUnits was causing concurrencies issues.
I then decided to use different priority queues for each worker thread.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I6f314468549000b2a9b51d3d470f04a0cb997879
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2367859
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69585}
This CL is the start to implement reference types support in Liftoff.
As a first step this CL implements the ref.null instruction, and allows
reference types as return values. This allows register allocation to be
extended to support reference types, and also adds an easy way to get a
reference type value for tests. Additionally with ref.null we don't have
to worry about garbage collection because 'null' is an immovable object
and therefore does not have to be scanned by the GC.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I5785dcf522c0d9881e1386f2d8b5d8560a16225c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352784
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69556}
With in-place representation changes we can transition from a double
field to a Tagged field without changing the map. So it is not always
safe to assume the loaded value would be a HeapNumber. TurboFan takes a
dependency on the field representation to ensure the code is deoptimized
on any changes. With dynamic map checks, it is not possible to take such
a dependency. Hence check the loaded value is a HeapNumber and
deoptimize otherwise.
Bug: chromium:1112155,v8:10582
Change-Id: I910ac1c0781ac8842fdbf272f9173b55b02923ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2354810
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69521}
To properly test tier-up in the V8 test suite, change the test variant
previously called --turbo-nci-as-highest-tier to
--turbo-nci-as-midtier. As a midtier (between ignition and turbofan),
all major parts of the NCI pipeline (codegen, caching inside the same
native context, tier-up) are exercised by test suite.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: Ic8ee2f3e3d72768c3869f5e0b25800dd0a5f25b7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2361462
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69501}
Load extends always load 8 bytes, so the access size does not depend on
MachineType of the load. The MachineType is used for classifying the
lane shape of the 8-byte load.
Also add cctest to load splats and load extends to test OOB. (Note that
load splats access size depends on MachineType).
Add regression test from clusterfuzz, minimized by ahaas@. Remove the
`--no-wasm-trap-handler` flag since we have a no_wasm_traps variant that
should test this flag.
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I27ba051d0536ca0f6fd75dd641ca9b78132dafed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2363291
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69489}
The V8 wasm fuzzer can create regression tests for failing fuzzer cases.
These regression tests use the wasm-module-builder.js. With the addition
of simd to the wasm-compile-fuzzer, the fuzzer can now create test cases
that use simd instructions, but the wasm-module-builder.js did not know
yet about the new instructions. This CL adds some instructions to
wasm-module-builder.js.
R=zhin@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I198e4f11c2225a65d6b438f95e351fc14ee66218
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2362694
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69467}
GC support works for the current 0 and 1 param version
of the wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I9e3822b1481223c44050d23ddee7293936f1e6d4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2351673
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69447}
In Liftoff, we were missing kS128 cases to load to/from stack.
For the x64 and ARM64 instruction selector, the calculation of
reverse_slot is incorrect for 128-bit values:
- reverse_slot += 2 (size of 128-bit values, 2 pointers)
- this copies from slot -2 into register
- but the value starts at slot -1, it occupies slots -1 and -2
- we end up copying slot -2 (most significant half) of the register, and
also slot -3, which is where rsi was store (Wasm instance addr)
- the test ends up with a different result every time
The calculation of reverse_slot is changed to follow how ia32 and ARM
does it, which is to start with
- reverse_slot = 0
- in the code-generator, add 1 to the slot
- then after emitting Peek operation, reverse_slot += 2
The fixes for x64 and ARM64 are in both instruction-selector and
code-generator.
ia32 and ARM didn't support writing kSimd128 values yet, it was only a
missing check in code-generator, so add that in.
For ARM, the codegen is more involved, vld1 does not support addressing
with an offset, so we have to do the addition into a scratch register.
Also adding a test for returning multiple v128. V128 is not exposed to
JavaScript, so we use a Wasm function call, and then an involved chain
of extract lanes, returning 6 i32 which we verify the values of. It
extracts the first and last lane of the i32x4 value in order to catch
bugs where we write or read to a wrong stack slot (off by 1).
The simd-scalar-lowering for kCall was only handling single s128 return,
we adopt the way i64-lowering handles kCall, so that is can now handle
any kinds of calls with s128 in the descriptor.
Bug: v8:10794
Bug: chromium:1115230
Change-Id: I2ccdd55f6292bc5794be78053b27e14da8cce70e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2355189
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69439}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This reached consensus in the March 2020 TC39.
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1908
This aligns JS with wasm, which allows atomics operations on non-shared
linear memory.
Bug: v8:10687, v8:9921
Change-Id: I7b60473b271cee6bccb342e97a4fd3781aedddb4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2330802
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69392}
TurboFan generates significantly less code than Liftoff for this test,
and depending on timing it can happen that we need to generate thousands
of functions, which takes some time and occasionally runs into timeouts.
Thus disable tier-up for this test, such that we stick with the much
longer Liftoff code, and reach the four separate code spaces quicker.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8e9a0cb466c1bdfef29aceeb5dd31aa96d05b70b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352490
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69369}
This is a reland of 57242a051e
no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
This is a reland of 60ee70bb40.
The wasm c-api flakes were fixed in https://crrev.com/c/2349293.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I2a7c1429812ca46d88a2902b8e0a7b7e3d638b56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349290
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69335}
This reverts commit 57242a051e.
Reason for revert: regression tests fails:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31477
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5d9d1dcb81771f71001d959ec5a03a43a11c4233
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1112124
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2347211
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69316}
vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
A new field for signature type was added to WasmExportedFunctionData.
It is set to 0 or 1 depending on the parameter count.
(It's set and being used only in 0 and 1 parameter cases.)
Added new JS tests for 1 parameter wasm functions.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I349d881a2860f1a50b91e08d0126ca71c5f6483b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339622
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69302}
Up until now. we only checked the size of tables defined in a module
at instantiation time. For imported tables we only checked if the
imported table matched the declared import in size. This causes a
problem because we allocate function tables also for imported tabled
before we actually look at the imported table.
With this CL we first check the size of all tables, and only then start
to initialize and load them.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114006
Change-Id: Iaf194ed21fb83304fe3a7f0f7ba7b282396e3954
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339473
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69291}
The cast from uint32_t to int caused an integer overflow that let a
bounds check succeed that should have failed.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114005
Change-Id: Iea1af70af300be54c2a33d7dd10b3faa34d56eaa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339472
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69289}
The test have been rewritten to be more robust -> maybe they're
robust enough for the GC fuzzer (DelayedTasksPlatform)?
Bug: v8:10239
Change-Id: I743cc2f804357aaef888bff7985dfb68a7feec5f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342848
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69287}
This reverts commit 60ee70bb40.
Reason for revert: wasm-api-tests/WasmCapiTest.Serialize starts flaking: https://crbug.com/v8/10784
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic1349375bd562bb0a2724c39c27ef3247461c97b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342845
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69284}
The test relies on certain maps not dying but didn't ensure that.
Bug: v8:10783
Change-Id: I708f7fc027ee0bf5656be9bb4f29130f5b924597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2340912
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69282}
We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
(debugging, dynamic tiering).
This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
enabling the debugger.
Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
This is a reland of 28ead05405
The failure is a test that is sensitive to adding a function
in a FunctionTemplate in d8: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=10783
Original change's description:
> [Atomics.waitAsync] Fix removing multiple nodes when Isolate deinits
>
> RemoveNode already nullifies the next_ pointer of FutexWaitListNode,
> and DeleteAsyncNode was trying to retrieve it.
>
> Bug: v8:10239
> Change-Id: I595885de87f433d263eeacfc825a689efd467f5e
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332812
> Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69259}
Bug: v8:10239
Tbr: leszeks@chromium.org
Change-Id: Icec590354886433a0b41c8f9b7af7101b54b7690
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339469
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69275}
We used to check the size of tables at compile time, and threw a
CompilationError if a given size exceeded the implementation-defined
limit. However, the spec defines that an error should only be thrown
when the implementation-defined limit is reached, which is either at
instantiation time of during runtime at a table.grow.
With this CL the V8 implementation becomes spec compliant in this
regard.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I7d0e688b385a65e4060a569e5ab1dec68947ceea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2326331
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69267}
Just like the optimized code cache, the compiler should check the
isolate cache for NCI code objects and return them if they exist.
Drive-by: Skip additional tests to fix the nci_as_highest_tier test
variant. These are related to interactions with deoptimization, which
NCI code doesn't fully support yet.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I6253811f96993796cfc38fff0da7ffb4f1a5eb24
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339095
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69251}
This test uses a i64x2.shr_s to shift a v128 with all bits set by 1,
resulting in v128 with all bits set (no change). This value is then
dropped, and param[2] (3), is returned.
Without the fix, -1 is returned, since i64x2.shr_s overwrites the
register for param[2] with 0xffffffff.
Bug: v8:10752
Bug: chromium:1111522
Change-Id: I0310bf6039be780a6738689069cdbcfa3a24bbdb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2335779
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69233}
If incoming map is deprecated, generate code to migrate the map. Since
this involves generating additional code and a call to runtime, we only
do this if one of the receiver maps was a migration target when
optimizing this function. If not, we deoptimize and discard the
optimized code if we see a deprecated map. This is to avoid bailout
loops when we see deprecated maps.
This change does the following:
// We generated code to migrate deprecated maps only if one of the maps
// in feedback vector is a migration target.
if ( there are migration targets in feedback)
{
if (checkMaps fails) {
if (incoming map is deprecated) {
migrate the map
checkMaps with the new map
} else {
bailout
}
}
} else {
if (checkMaps fails)
bailout;
}
Bug: v8:10582, v8:9684
Change-Id: I8a04c77ed209dd2fb0300a783d844f2335a678c8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2292231
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69179}
If we are near the stack limit, calling the proxy method might not work
any more. Instead of crashing because of an empty MaybeLocal, handle
this gracefully.
Drive-by: Minor refactoring in TryGetValue.
R=tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1110001
Change-Id: I07e7773768166b3dbea2e6b75a3ab8b24bfeee53
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332156
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69161}
The bug was that the allocation of the result array (before the loop)
was using the outer frame state, thus returning the allocation's result
(an array full of holes) as the return value of the map operation in
case the allocation triggers a lazy deopt.
Bug: chromium:1104514
Change-Id: I9a6db8a5860472e1b438b6b54414938d61e166c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2324249
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69129}
This cl also
1. Fixes a bug in effect-control-linearizer where we should have
converted fixed array length from Smi to integer
2. Also prints deopt location for the new "bailout" deopt type on
--trace-deopt.
Bug: v8:10582, v8:9684
Change-Id: Iafc5e8abbca5252a8783a5a1184a1667a7f708a4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2297460
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69115}
This generic wrapper builtin is currently used only when the wasm
function has no parameters and no return value.
Added a new V8 flag to use this generic wrapper.
Also added a JS test function for this generic wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: Id8cd1771f26922927363b715d8a6ffd384a143ce
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2307240
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69097}
This test should've been rewritten in the last
batch rewrite but wasn't.
Bug: v8:10239
Change-Id: Ic2949e6282f72975898ab7e9aefe3210bba71fbf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2319988
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69072}
Using uint8_t[] causes decay to pointer issue, which manifests in
copying garbage values in the call to WriteLittleEndianValue. Change it
to use a std::array, which doesn't have the decaying behavior.
Also add a regression test from comment#6 of the linked bug.
Bug: v8:10731
Change-Id: I4a1ca69fe99806642e9931625ca7aeab6663f955
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2316465
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69052}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
On desktop systems, we use a very basic tiering strategy: Everything is
initially compiled with Liftoff, and once that is done, the module can
start being used. Concurrently to the execution, we re-compile all code
with TurboFan, and hot-swap each function once TurboFan finishes.
We should start using a more dynamic strategy where each function is
tiered-up when judged necessary. This change will then tier-up each
liftoff function once it has been called 5 times.
I then added a counter in the native module, that is updated directly
from Liftoff code, and a runtime call is then made when the counter
reaches the goal.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I8dc2b02fdff8d97781bb1cf496886594b3d7f644
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2306803
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68971}
With work on NCI proceeding, it makes sense to test multiple
pipeline configurations.
The nci variant (passes --turbo-nci) now spawns dedicated NCI
compilation jobs and inserts generated code into the code cache.
The nci_as_highest_tier variant (passes --turbo-nci-as-highest-tier)
simply replaces TF with NCI code (no extra jobs, no extra caching).
This mode stresses NCI generated code more than the nci variant, in
which NCI code only runs on cache hits.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I4c2a43cce5271a6c288e7aba195dcc9daed6af9d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2299361
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68964}
The CanTailCall check only passes if the return locations are the
same in the caller and the callee. However, stack returns are expected
to be at a different offset depending on the stack space reserved for
parameters.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7431
Change-Id: Iaac15fce889d6cd7d1ac88f320a872202281fb5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2289789
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68933}
