The included test case illustrates the problem. It subtracts (16 << 27)
from another number. The Machine Operator Reducer would replace the
shift computation with 0x0000000080000000, and then change the subtract
to an add of -(0x0000000080000000), which is 0xffffffff80000000.
The instruction selector would determine that this value could be an
immediate, because it fits in 32 bits, so it would select the lea
instruction. Finally, the code generator would detect that the
immediate was less than 0, flip the sign and replace the add with a
subtract of 0x80000000. Because the x64 subtract instruction's
immediate field is 32 bits, the processor would interpret this as
0xffffffff80000000 instead of an unsigned value.
This change fixes the issue by making the CanBeImmediate check
explicitly compare against INT_MIN and INT_MAX. We disallow INT_MIN
as an immediate precisely because we cannot tell 0x0000000080000000
from 0xffffffff80000000 when truncated to 32 bits.
Bug: chromium:711203
Change-Id: Ie371b8ea290684a6bb723bae9c693a866f961850
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/482448
Commit-Queue: Eric Holk <eholk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44758}
+ additional fixes uncovered by bug, and addressed remaining feedback
from original CL (https://codereview.chromium.org/2806073002/).
Note that the regression test differs slightly from the bug reported one,
in that it catches the RangeError which will eventually be thrown due
to call stack size being exceeded.
BUG=chromium:712569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2825073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44700}
Currently when the module has memory specified in the compiled bytes, but with no initial memory
exported memory assigns a bogus buffer to the instance. When grow_memory is called on this buffer, it tries to patch an incorrect address.
- Fix exported memory to handle no initial memory
- Fix grow_memory to handle uninitialized buffers
BUG=chromium:710844
R=bradnelson@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2820223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44671}
Ensuring we move forward all the deferred handles, in all cases.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2807013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44525}
We went on decoding the next section, which happened to be the start
section. But since the function section had an error, the signature
pointer was not still {nullptr} on the start function, leading to a
segfault.
Drive-by fix: Improve decoder trace output.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:708714, chromium:708787
Change-Id: I5ae2adb32764b9d154f1ca878019f26ac31839b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472847
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44521}
The format of the name section changed recently. It now contains
subsections of different type (currently for function names or local
variable names).
This CL changes our internal wasm module builders (in JS and C++) to
emit this new format, and changes the decoder to understand it.
We currently only parse the function name section, and ignore names of
local variables. I will later extend this to parse local variable names
when needed for debugging.
R=ahaas@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6222
Change-Id: I2627160c25c9209a3f09abe0b88941ec48b24434
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/470247
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44492}
The test was out-dated. The wasm bytes still had the version 0xd, and
no END instruction at the end of the function. In addition, the test
used asynchronous compilation but did not wait for the promise to
resolve.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib01f47ac8f668401ed14470af7100e990e5bbd94
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/463286
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44276}
The int64-lowering lowers return nodes which return one int64 value into
a return node which returns two int32 values. For this lowering it has
to adjust the input count of the return operator.
The existing code assumed that if the signature of a function said that
the return type is int64, then all return nodes have int64 inputs.
However, with a recent CL we also introduced void returns. With this CL
I check if the number of inputs of a return node changes with the
DefaultLowering, and only if the number of inputs changes, then I check
if I also have to change the operator of the return node.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-6164
BUG=v8:6164
Change-Id: I004ab1b4be942cc045719f306705d95b48707a1c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/461941
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44232}
This reverts commit 6ad5ca59c9.
Reason for revert: Breaks on noi18n bot, needs fix in the new regression test
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Check the result of Promise::Resolver
>
> We check that if we do not get a result, or if we get a negative result,
> then there has to be a scheduled exception.
>
> R=clemensh@chromium.org
> TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-704127
> BUG=chromium:704127
>
> Change-Id: I3fef3cc02f685a9cbc3f10203e2a59b61b3702d5
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458282
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44144}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium.org,v8-reviews@googlegroups.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:704127
Change-Id: Ibf6d27929c88064bc2755688358998640092e31a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/459512
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44145}
We check that if we do not get a result, or if we get a negative result,
then there has to be a scheduled exception.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-704127
BUG=chromium:704127
Change-Id: I3fef3cc02f685a9cbc3f10203e2a59b61b3702d5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458282
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44144}
The stack check at the beginning of each function maps to the wasm byte
offset 0. For asm.js functions, this byte offset is mapped further to an
asm.js source position. For most functions, we explicitly add an entry
to this side table for offset 0. This was missing for the start
function.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4203,chromium:703568
Change-Id: I05bc4a8cfa666864bb7a0b23f75186abe0be9bee
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458437
Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44037}
This fixes a bug where an exported function is being specialized, but
the callsite inside the JS_TO_WASM function was patched to call an
interpreter entry instead. We would not identify the call site as the
one to be patched during specialization, and would thus fail a DCHECK.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5822, chromium:702839
Change-Id: I148d98333051c399a4cb11bd9620b396f4eb261d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/456282
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43942}
From asm.js code we might get an empty ArrayBuffer as heap memory. In
this case, both the old memory start and the new memory start will be
nullptr. The size however has to be patched from default_size to 0.
This CL changes code specialization to be able to either patch memory
references, or patch memory sizes or both.
R=titzer@chromium.org, ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:698587
Change-Id: I4d9d811d75cb83842f23df317e8e7fc02aeb5146
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/450257
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43613}
One optimization in the machine-operator-reducer did not consider that
that word32 shift left instructions only consider the last 5 bits of
the shift input.
The issue only occurs for WebAssembly because in JavaScript we always
add a "& 0xf" on the shift value to the TurboFan graph.
For additional background: The JavaScript and WebAssembly spec both
say that only the last 5 bits of the shift value are used in the
word32-shift-left operation. This means that an "x << 0x29", in the
code is actually executed as "x << 0x09". Therefore the changes in
this CL are okay because they mask the last 5 bit of the shift value.
BUG=chromium:689450
Change-Id: Id92f298ed6d7f1714b109b3f4fbcecd5ac6d30f7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439312
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43245}
The testb instruction requires the REX prefix when either of its
operands uses a register with the high bit set. The existing code only
considered the register operand. In the test case the REX prefix was not
emitted because the testb instruction had the register operand RAX which
does not have the high bit set. The REX prefix was necessary though
because the memory operand used R8, which has the high bit set.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:688876
Change-Id: Ib214bebbe75965664f2aea530e29afa95a54f44f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439145
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43030}
This CL adds --crankshaft and --no-always-opt flags to the tests that use
assertOptimized() and assertUnoptimized() respectively.
This CL also adds presubmit checks that ensure that tests have the proper
flags set.
BUG=v8:5890
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2653753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42709}
The IA32AddPair and IA32SubPair instructions were using an input register as a
temporary value, which led to registers sometimes being clobbered when they
shouldn't have been. This led to problems, for example, in calling printf to
format doubles:
printf("%f", 1.2345) => 0.61725 (on x86)
BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5800
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637583002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42486}
- Currently WebAssembly.Memory.grow() assumes that it always has an instance associated with it,
fix to grow and reflect new size when no instance is associated with memory object.
- Correctness fixes for the js api, throw range errors instead of generic errors
BUG=chromium:680938
R=bradnelson@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2638243002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42432}
The scenario here: the asm function fails asm validation,
so we emit a message. In doing so, we create a JSValue wrapper for
the script object that we cache on the script object. This wrapper
is context-dependent and causes the code serializer to choke.
R=mtrofin@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:674446,chromium:673321
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2586943003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41794}
Determine if the scope of the function to be serialized includes asm-
wasm, and if so, bypass serialization, since we do not support it in
that scenario.
In this change, we do so regardless of whether the asm-wasm path was
successful. This is so we keep the design simple, since the guidance
to developers, moving forward, is to use wasm.
BUG=643595
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2573193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41704}
Previous fuzzer fix broke the case when the pending assessment came from the same
block. In that case, the assessments table does not have an entry yet for the block,
because we register only when we're done processing a block.
BUG=667745
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2519973004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41193}
The verifier needs to use the block and assessments in that block corresponding to
a predecessor of a "pending" assessment. Not doing that causes incorrect
assessments when 2 locations are swapped.
BUG=665402
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2515803002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41159}
- When module bytes have a memory maximum defined, compiled module object should set maximum memory
- Exported memory objects should set maximum value on the memory objects
- Update tests to use declared maximum values.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2474333003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40820}
This CL refactors the handling of metadata associated with WebAssembly
modules to reduce the duplicate marshalling of data from the C++ world
to the JavaScript world. It does this by wrapping the C++ WasmModule*
object in a Foreign that is rooted from the on-heap WasmCompiledModule
(which is itself just a FixedArray). Upon serialization, the C++ object
is ignored and the original WASM wire bytes are serialized. Upon
deserialization, the C++ object is reconstituted by reparsing the bytes.
This is motivated by increasing complications in implementing the JS
API, in particular WebAssembly.Table, which must perform signature
canonicalization across instances.
Additionally, this CL implements the proper base + offset initialization
behavior for tables.
R=rossberg@chromium.org,bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5507, chromium:575167, chromium:657316
Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/2424623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40434}
Using uint32 to store the the number of control outputs allows WebAssembly switches to have more than 2^16 case.
BUG=v8:5531
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-5531
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/2425983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40420}
A decoder error sets builder_ to null, which causes builder_->StackCheck
to segfault.
R=titzer@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/loop-stack-check
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2416873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40271}
- Added gating code in the module-decoder to allow SIMD code only when
it can be decoded correctly
- SIMD128 values should not be exported to JS
- Try/Catch should not be available in asmjs modules
- Trivial fixes for S128 values
BUG=chromium:648079
R=ahaas@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org, bradnelson@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2400863003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40067}
The implementation of MemorySize with RelocatableInt32Constants is
problematic if MemorySize is placed close to a GrowMemory instruction in
the code. The use of a runtime function guarantees that the order in
which MemorySize and GrowMemory is executed is correct.
R=titzer@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:651961
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-651961
Committed: https://crrev.com/2c12a9a42d454a36fcd2931fa458d72832eeb689
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386183004
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39972}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39980}
Reason for revert:
Patch problem
Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Call a runtime function for a MemorySize instruction.
>
> The implementation of MemorySize with RelocatableInt32Constants is
> problematic if MemorySize is placed close to a GrowMemory instruction in
> the code. The use of a runtime function guarantees that the order in
> which MemorySize and GrowMemory is executed is correct.
>
> R=titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=chromium:651961
> TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-651961
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2c12a9a42d454a36fcd2931fa458d72832eeb689
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39972}
TBR=titzer@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:651961
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2391223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39973}
The implementation of MemorySize with RelocatableInt32Constants is
problematic if MemorySize is placed close to a GrowMemory instruction in
the code. The use of a runtime function guarantees that the order in
which MemorySize and GrowMemory is executed is correct.
R=titzer@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:651961
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regression-651961
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386183004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39972}
This fixes a gc stress bug. We cannot rely on an ordering of
clearing of the weak cells, so we explicitly reset the weak
link to the owning instance, when finalizing a compiled
module. In turn, this serves as a reliable signal when GCs
happen while instantiating, allowing us to correctly link the
new instance.
BUG=chromium:652425
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2393443003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39964}
The module size is encoded as a HeapNumber, and needs to be
explicitly cloned.
BUG=chromium:647649
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2347333002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39845}
We'd like wasm regressions to live under a subfolder of the mjsunit
regression folder.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2344373002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39483}
