This makes the inlining of the default resolve/reject closures generated
by the Promise constructor effective. To be really useful we still need
to have the Promise constructor inlined (work-in-progress) and eventually
track SharedFunctionInfo feedback in the CALL_IC.
Bug: v8:2206, v8:7253
Change-Id: I08fa8ca72754f459ae36027a55377ef57d411cdc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/926103
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51390}
This introduces dedicated builtins
- FulfillPromise,
- RejectPromise, and
- ResolvePromise,
which perform the corresponding operations from the language
specification, and removes the redundant entry points and the
excessive inlining of these operations into other builtins. We
also add the same logic on the C++ side, so that we don't need
to go into JavaScript land when resolving/rejecting from the
API.
The C++ side has a complete implementation, including full support
for the debugger and the current PromiseHook machinery. This is to
avoid constantly crossing the boundary for those cases, and to also
simplify the CSA side (and soon the TurboFan side), where we only
do the fast-path and bail out to the runtime for the general handling.
On top of this we introduce %_RejectPromise and %_ResolvePromise,
which are entry points used by the bytecode and parser desugarings
for async functions, and also used by the V8 Extras API. Thanks to
this we can uniformly optimize these in TurboFan, where we have
corresponding operators JSRejectPromise and JSResolvePromise, which
currently just call into the builtins, but middle-term can be further
optimized, i.e. to skip the "then" lookup for JSResolvePromise when
we know something about the resolution.
In TurboFan we can also already inline the default PromiseCapability
[[Reject]] and [[Resolve]] functions, although this is not as effective
as it can be right now, until we have inlining support for the Promise
constructor (being worked on by petermarshall@ right now) and/or SFI
based CALL_IC feedback.
Overall this change is meant as a refactoring without significant
performance impact anywhere; it seems to improve performance of
simple async functions a bit, but otherwise is neutral.
Bug: v8:7253
Change-Id: Id0b979f9b2843560e38cd8df4b02627dad4b6d8c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/911632
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51260}
