Declare Variables with a name and position, rather than by passing
through a VariableProxy. This allows us to not create dummy proxies
for things like function declarations, and allows us to consider those
declarations unused.
As a side-effect, we also have to check if a variable is unused in the
bytecode generator (as it will no longer be allocated), and we end up
skip generating code/SFIs for dead variables/functions.
Change-Id: I4c2c872473f23e124f9456b4b92f87159658f8e0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1414916
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59088}
This is a reland of part of
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1397664.
It drops the explicit fni_.Infer() call after parsing arrow functions. We'll
want to avoid inferring if the arrow function is an argument to a function
call.
It also avoids adding the single argument of "name => " to the inferred name.
Bug: chromium:916975
Change-Id: I96a934408113483d73eba14073fe21e8cfe2ada6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1397665
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58613}
This reverts commit 3411e7c3e8.
Reason for revert: Breaks test expecations - https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_rel_ng/260731
Original change's description:
> [parser] Create arrow function scopes while parsing the head
>
> This simplifies NextArrowFunctionInfo, allows us to Scope::Snapshot::Reparent
> directly rather than moving it, and allows us to skip reparenting in the simple
> parameter arrow function cases.
>
> This CL additionally fixes arrow function name inferring.
>
> Change-Id: Ie3e5ea778f3d7b84b2a10d4f4ff73931cfc9384a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1386147
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58405}
TBR=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Change-Id: I8f31b96f844f0673364bf435fa6c809e40d62fa3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1388541
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58446}
This simplifies NextArrowFunctionInfo, allows us to Scope::Snapshot::Reparent
directly rather than moving it, and allows us to skip reparenting in the simple
parameter arrow function cases.
This CL additionally fixes arrow function name inferring.
Change-Id: Ie3e5ea778f3d7b84b2a10d4f4ff73931cfc9384a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1386147
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58405}
Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).
BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
position. It's general treatment for most cases.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
- debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
implementation,
- BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
on first generated bytecode,
- it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
..->BuildReturnPrologue();
..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
..->Return();
In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
position when we emit return bytecode right here.
So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
functions, I'll address async functions later.
[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/
Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
With inline breakpoints DevTools are ready for break position aligned breakpoints instead of statement aligned.
BUG=chromium:695236
R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2709263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43385}
If we just call CreateDebugInfo in GetPossibleBreakpoints then we won't call PrepareFunctionForBreakPoints and won't be able to step into this function or pause at breakpoint inside.
BUG=v8:5695
R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2540943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41401}
Currently function like "() => 239" contains offset 3 as begin of function and 8 as end of function.
This CL changes this to 6 and 9 respectively.
BUG=chromium:566801
R=yangguo@chromium.org,dgozman@chromium.org
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2488493003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40864}
This method iterates through all shared function info which are related to passed script, compiles debug code for SFI in range if needed and returns possible break locations.
BUG=chromium:566801
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2465553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40783}