In addition to the previous change enabling forced FunctionDeclaration
allocation when block code coverage is enabled, enable it now for all
(non-best-effort) code coverage by reading off the coverage mode from
the isolate (rather than relying on the presence of a source range map).
Bug: chromium:927464
Change-Id: I26f86c9fbebc0df52d5cdeff3ca1095215a6d912
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1456041
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59626}
Declare Variables with a name and position, rather than by passing
through a VariableProxy. This allows us to not create dummy proxies
for things like function declarations, and allows us to consider those
declarations unused.
As a side-effect, we also have to check if a variable is unused in the
bytecode generator (as it will no longer be allocated), and we end up
skip generating code/SFIs for dead variables/functions.
Change-Id: I4c2c872473f23e124f9456b4b92f87159658f8e0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1414916
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59088}
This reverts commit 003159e777.
Reason for revert: breaks roll into Chromium: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_headless_rel/3140
Original change's description:
> [inspector] RemoteObject.description should be empty for primitive type
>
> We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
> can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
> (remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
> simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
>
> R=dgozman@chromium.org
> TBR=jgruber@chromium.org
>
> Bug: chromium:595206
> Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
> Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
TBR=dgozman@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org,kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifc184e1ac158d9ea7034922a7250444448fac49f
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1081207
Reviewed-by: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53461}
We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
(remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
R=dgozman@chromium.orgTBR=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
This is so that precise coverage starts with a clean slate.
The old behavior can be emulated by calling getBestEffortCoverage
before starting precise coverage.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:757998
Change-Id: Ib3ee2316966f676456198159bdcf8ba8b9d3896f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635084
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47629}
Add "detailed" flag to Profiler.startPreciseCoverage to specify
granularity (block coverage vs function coverage).
The default value is currently set to FLAG_block_coverage, which
is currently true. This is so that the V8 roll does not break
LayoutTests. I'll set it to false once I made changes to Blink.
R=jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
Bug: v8:6738
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: I7242e897ab02713188a5292ca8c8bb58985e3a9b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/625616
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47533}
Consider:
function f() {
return;
}
This CL ensures that the closing brace is considered as covered by
introducing a special case for open-ended range rewrites when the
parent range is the function range itself.
Bug: v8:6000, v8:6661
Change-Id: I0be307759967e9f4df245a4f367326a37dda86fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/597651
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47079}
This piggy-backs on top of existing precise and best-effort coverage to expose
block coverage through the inspector protocol.
Coverage collection now implicitly reports block-granularity coverage when
available. A new 'isBlockCoverage' property on Inspector's FunctionCoverage
type specifies the granularity of reported coverage.
For now, only count-based block coverage is supported, but binary block
coverage should follow soon.
Support is still gated behind the --block-coverage flag.
Bug: v8:6000
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I9c4d64e1d2a098e66178b3a68dcee800de0081af
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532975
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46157}
With precise binary code coverage, the reported count is either 0 or 1.
We only report 1 the first time we collect coverage data after the
function has been executed.
Since we do not care about the accurate execution count, we can optimize
the function once it has been executed once.
Also change best effort coverage to be implicitly binary.
R=caseq@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2766573003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44074}
We used to clear invocation counts when enabling precise coverage.
This is not necessary, and we could continue to use the existing
invocation counts on the heap. The old behavior can be achieved
by explicitly resetting the counts by polling coverage data.
R=jgruber@chromium.org,caseq@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2768453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43964}
If the top-level function cannot be found, we previously assumed an
invocation count of 1. This is wrong when we expect the invocation
counts to be reset for precise coverage.
TBR=jgruber@chromium.orgR=caseq@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723003007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43620}
