Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ross McIlroy
ac7c82f905 [cleanup] Add %PrepareForOptimization to some more mjsunit tests.
Bug: v8:8801,v8:8394,v8:9183
Change-Id: If6a4f39991f222337f1c49bd0439e9669d89b030
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1660486
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62181}
2019-06-14 13:55:11 +00:00
kmillikin@chromium.org
7adb10a48e Fix a bug in named getter/setter compilation.
Because these are function literals that have an associated name, we were
compiling them as if they were named function expressions.  This is
incorrect, the property name should not be in scope.

R=vegorov@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7599024

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8863 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
2011-08-09 12:43:08 +00:00
kmillikin@chromium.org
d941053dbe Revert "Revert "Fix a bug in scope analysis.""
Reapply r8838 with a fix for the issue of function names.

Because function names can be added/changed/removed through the API,
remember whether the function is anonymous when initially parsed and use
that information when compiling.

R=vegorov@chromium.org
BUG=1583
TEST=regress-1583

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7491097

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8858 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
2011-08-08 16:14:46 +00:00
kmillikin@chromium.org
3e28347d55 Revert "Fix a bug in scope analysis."
This reverts commit revision 8838.

TBR=ricow@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7584005

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8839 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
2011-08-05 09:20:08 +00:00
kmillikin@chromium.org
b625ce2b6b Fix a bug in scope analysis.
When recompiling code (e.g., when optimizing) we could incorrectly hoist
some function expressions.  This leads to incorrect results or a crash.  The
root cause was that functions were not correctly categorized as expression
or declaration at parse time.

This requires some extra hoops to prevent the print name "anonymous" for
functions created by 'new Function' from establishing a binding.

R=vegorov@chromium.org,kasperl@chromium.org
BUG=1583
TEST=regress-1583

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7572019

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8838 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
2011-08-05 08:28:11 +00:00