A StepOver at a return (either explicit return instruction, or implicit
return at the end of the function) should stop again in the caller
frame.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: I313e6b612ac52e73b33ef07c6da1ced2aa0db600
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2110250
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66852}
This fixes issues with replacing the return address of deeper (non-top)
wasm frames, i.e. frames which are at a call position. The replaced
address should also point after the call in the new code, so we don't
execute the same call again.
This is achieved by using slightly different encodings for breakpoint
positions and other (wasm instruction) positions. Breakpoints set
{is_instruction} to {false} in the source position table entry, whereas
usual wasm instruction set it to {true}.
Also, during stack walking for OSR, we remember whether we want to OSR
to the position before the instruction (if it's the top frame), or after
the call instruction (if it's deeper in the stack). We then use the
{is_instruction} predicate to find the right location.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: I73212a7532c6ecf4c82bde76fe4059c8203e422c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116206
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66850}
Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and
slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last
step action was anything other than StepNext.
In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for
StepOver at a return location.
When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test
uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as
expected this seems to work out of the box.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a
small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a
basic step over functionality.
We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a
return instruction).
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
