The problem appeared due to a fact that stubs doesn't create a stack
frame, reusing the stack frame of the caller function. When building
stack traces, the current function is retrieved from PC, and its
callees are retrieved by traversing the stack backwards. Thus, for
stubs, the stub itself was discovered via PC, and then stub's caller's
caller was retrieved from stack.
To fix this problem, a pointer to JSFunction object is now captured
from the topmost stack frame, and is saved into stack trace log
record. Then a simple heuristics is applied whether a referred
function should be added to decoded stack, or not, to avoid reporting
the same function twice (from PC and from the pointer.)
BUG=553
TEST=added to mjsunit/tools/tickprocessor
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/546089
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@3673 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
MSVS names '.map' file using only module's name, so both 'a.exe' and 'a.dll' will have 'a.map' file. To distinguish an originating module, we're now checking for image base which is always 00400000 for .exe files, and not 00400000 for .dlls.
Verified that windows-tick-processor can now process logs from Chromium using .map file generated for 'chrome.dll', an that it still works for V8's 'shell.exe'.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/172044
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2699 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
'nm' is now called with an option to report function code sizes. Static code entries are restricted to the sizes reported, and the remaining unnamed code is attributed to a library as a whole. This makes reports more accurate, as some functions are tiny, but has chunks of unnamed code behind them.
This change doesn't affect reporting on Windows, as in .map files function code sizes aren't specified.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/149513
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2455 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This is an effort to reuse profiler data processing code both in
TickProcessor and Dev Tools Profiler. The old Python implementation
will be removed.
The new TickProcessor works almost identical to the previous one.
However, it has some differences:
1. Not very useful "Call profile" section is replaced with a new
WebKit-like "Bottom up (heavy) profile" which shows the most
expensive functions together with their callers. I used it
personally in order to find and remove bottlenecks in the
tickprocessor script itself, and found it quite helpful.
2. Code entries with duplicate names (they occur for RegExes, stubs
and sometimes for anonymous Function objects) are now distinguished
by adding an occurence number inside curly brackets.
3. (Address -> code entry) mapping is more precise in boundary cases.
4. Windows version no more requires specifying .map file location.
5. Works faster.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/99054
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@1802 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This is the first step in reimplementing tick processing scripts in
JavaScript. The goal is to have the same source both for Dev Tools and
Golem, so Python implementation will be removed to avoid code
duplication.
The implementation follows the Dev Tools style: namespaces and JSDocs
are used.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/67151
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@1709 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
