Array.prototype.concat did not work correct with complex elements on the
receiver or the prototype chain.
BUG=chromium:594574
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34798}
The performance of Array::concat is critical of jQuery benchmark from
http://www.dromaeo.com. Our current implementation in JavaScript is very
generic and is several times slower than JSC and SpiderMonkey.
Re-implement Array::concat in C++ to take advantage of underlying implementation
details. This cuts dom-travesal-jquery execution time by half.
We may want to move Array specific implementation into a separate source file,
say jsarray.cc.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7990
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@625 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
In the shell sample don't print the result of executing a script, only
evaluating expressions.
Fixed issue when building samples on Windows using a shared V8
library. Added visibility option on Linux build which makes the
generated library 18% smaller.
Changed build system to accept multiple build modes in one build and
generate seperate objects, libraries and executables for each mode.
Removed deferred negation optimization (a * -b => -(a * b)) since this
visibly changes operand conversion order.
Improved parsing performance by introducing stack guard in preparsing.
Without a stack guard preparsing always bails out with stack overflow.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
