When constant-folding the test based on static types in the function
body decoder, we have to ensure Liftoff's value stack is properly
updated.
Fixed: chromium:1172912
Change-Id: I618992608882b850a8a4bce0b267ce456e4c2a40
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2664447
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72482}
This is a reland of commit 9c09c227b0.
The fix for gc stress failure is merged: https://crrev.com/c/2656857.
Original change's description:
> Bug: v8:11331
> Change-Id: Ie394ec841a1a1c4030c4f589eac2cee8a6a2a1f9
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2639033
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72304}
Bug: v8:11331
Change-Id: I82f57b3fe5f0c456472aa7ce404703f34b73d17e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2659511
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72465}
Instead of updating the detected features set directly, use the
synchronized {OnCompilationStopped} method.
In order to avoid this error in the future, the whole
{detected_features()} getter is removed, as it returns a pointer which
can only be accessed when holding the mutex anyway. Also, the refactored
code was the only user of this dangerous method.
Drive-by: Pass the WasmFeatures set by value, since it's just an
EnumSet.
Drive-by 2: Remove a print line from the regression test which can be
confusing if the test is picked up again by foozzie.
R=ahaas@chromium.orgCC=zhin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:11357
Change-Id: I75b5c8f35983d2bc1fd2b61adcb2ecfc18564f39
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2653226
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72375}
This reverts commit 9c09c227b0.
Reason for revert: gc stress failures https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20gc%20stress/20563/overview
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd] Merge all any_true to v128.any_true
>
> In https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/423, all any_true
> instructions were removed, and replaced with a single v128.any_true.
>
> This patch removes all but v8x16.any_true, and renames it to
> v128.any_true.
>
> Bug: v8:11331
> Change-Id: Ie394ec841a1a1c4030c4f589eac2cee8a6a2a1f9
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2639033
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72304}
TBR=neis@chromium.org,gdeepti@chromium.org,neis@google.com,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I52dbf8de679059dd7b17908c1fe3ada0eb54ff84
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:11331
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2649240
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72305}
In https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/423, all any_true
instructions were removed, and replaced with a single v128.any_true.
This patch removes all but v8x16.any_true, and renames it to
v128.any_true.
Bug: v8:11331
Change-Id: Ie394ec841a1a1c4030c4f589eac2cee8a6a2a1f9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2639033
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72304}
This reverts commit 6ada6a90ee.
Reason for revert: Revert for link issue:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=11335
Original change's description:
> Reland "Faster JS-to-Wasm calls"
>
> This is a reland of 860fcb1bd2
>
> - Disabled the tests for this feature in V8-lite mode (the original
> change broke V8-lite tests)
> - Also modified test console-profile-wasm.js that was brittle with this
> change because it assumed that there was always a JS-to-Wasm wrapper
> but this is not the case when the TurboFan compilation completes before
> the Liftoff-compiled code starts to run.
>
> More changes in Patchset 8:
>
> - Moved inlining of the "JSToWasm Wrapper" away from simplified-lowering,
> into a new phase, wasm-inlining that reuses the JSInliner reducer.
> The doc
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mXxYnYN77tK-R1JOVo6tFG3jNpMzfueQN1Zp5h3r9aM/edit#
> describes the new logic.
>
> - Fixed a couple of small issues in wasm_compiler.cc to make sure that
> the graph "JSToWasm Wrapper" subgraph has a valid Control chain;
> this should solve the problem we had inlining the calls in functions
> that can throw exception.
>
>
> Original change's description:
> > Faster JS-to-Wasm calls
> >
> > This replaces https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2376165/.
> >
> > Currently JS-to-Wasm calls go through a wrapper/trampoline, built on
> > the basis of the signature of a Wasm function to call, and whose task
> > is to:
> > - set "thread_in_wasm_flag" to true
> > - convert the arguments from tagged types into Wasm native types
> > - calculate the address of the Wasm function to call and call it
> > - convert back the result from Wasm native types into tagged types
> > - reset "thread_in_wasm_flag" to false.
> >
> > This CL tries to improve the performance of JS-to-Wasm calls by
> > inlining the code of the JS-to-Wasm wrappers in the call site.
> >
> > It introduces a new IR operand, JSWasmCall, which replaces JSCall for
> > this kind of calls. A 'JSWasmCall' node is associated to
> > WasmCallParameters, which contain information about the signature of
> > the Wasm function to call.
> >
> > WasmWrapperGraphBuilder::BuildJSToWasmWrapper is modified to avoid generating code to convert the types for the arguments
> > of the Wasm function, when the conversion is not necessary.
> > The actual inlining of the graph generated for this wrapper happens in
> > the simplified-lowering phase.
> >
> > A new builtin, JSToWasmLazyDeoptContinuation, is introduced to manage
> > lazy deoptimizations that can happen if the Wasm function callee calls
> > back some JS code that invalidates the compiled JS caller function.
> >
> > Bug: v8:11092
> > Change-Id: I3174c1c1f59b39107b333d1929ecc0584486b8ad
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2557538
> > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis (ooo until January 5) <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71824}
>
> Bug: v8:11092
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_arm_lite_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I7d8523fa916bf4029a31f8c7a72bbd93336dc0b9
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2596784
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72147}
Tbr: ahaas@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: v8:11092, v8:11335
Change-Id: Iab2908928dfe7ea353f70cb5d3bf2de4d3074db6
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_arm_lite_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2644758
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72253}
On x64, reference types where not handled yet in LiftoffAssembler::push.
Note that the values pushed on the stack there do not have to be
handled by a safepoint. The reason is that stack parameters in general
are handled separately from safepoints.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1168116
Change-Id: Ie62479c13839f0ba240d0e41fa76d07a2cc48881
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2642263
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72252}
The inlining of JS-to-Wasm wrappers can fail inside try/catch because
the IR built by WasmWrapperGraphBuilder::BuildJSToWasmWrapper does not
always set the correct control outputs in the call node.
This patch disables inlining inside try/catch to work around this issue.
Bug: chromium:1168386
Change-Id: I1b43bdb044b38d95c2d309290e228a86ba1513a3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2639927
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72191}
Ext mul's codegen assumes that all inputs are in registers, but the
instruction-selector wasn't the correct constraints. The codegen for ext
mul is slightly complicated so we chose to restrict the inputs to be
registers rather than changing codegen.
Bug: chromium:1165966,v8:11262
Change-Id: I5d4eb56d17a4d0a2927b089dbf74362c7e7ff4fc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2626711
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72073}
This CL fixes a bug in the code generation for I32AtomicCompareExchange
in Liftoff on ia32. The problem is the inconsistency that
LiftoffAssembler::PeekToRegister(...) introduces to the cache state.
PeekToRegister loads the value from the value stack into a register, but
does not pop the value off the stack. When the value was already stored
in a register, the use counter of that register gets decreased, even
though the value is still on the stack.
The problem arises when this register later gets reused, which is
necessary unfortunately on ia32. When SpillRegister is called for this
register, all stack values that are stored in this register get written
to memory. SpillRegister uses the use counter of the register to detect
when the register was spilled to all stack slots that were cached by
this register. However, as described above, the value stack and the use
counter are inconsistent at that moment, so SpillRegister finishes
early and does not spill the register to all stack values, and this
causes the bug later.
With this CL the decrement of the use counter gets delayed until when
the value actually gets popped off the stack.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1145135
Change-Id: I07cb256a7e5135dbce41b246c120650635ad2758
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2602464
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72018}
We were incorrectly clearing the high reg from the list of regs to load.
The intention was to prevent double (and incorrect) loading - loading
128 bits from the low fp and the loading 128 bits from the high fp.
But this violates the assumption that the two regs in a pair would be
set or unset at the same time.
The fix here is to introduce a new enum for register loads, a nop, which
does nothing. The high fp of the fp pair will be tied to this nop, so as
we iterate down the reglist, we load 128 bits using the low fp, then
don't load anything for the high fp.
Bug: chromium:1161654
Change-Id: If2ea79132b78623e5990237c60cf0883d9a8223f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2617380
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71976}
The flag was enabled by default in M85, it is time to remove it.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7741, chromium:1160677
Change-Id: Ic4a9490efa645a7466cb844484169ab262f0df38
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2610965
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71945}
This adds a regression test for a bug in lowering load transforms.
This test will fail if 0efa3fd97e is
reverted.
Bug: chromium:1124885
Change-Id: I31b714d4565c4fff730c1274af8059031cb1e1b5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2610508
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71919}
In https://crrev.com/c/2591859 we changed the way we generate code for
v128.select, which assumes that all inputs are registers. We did not
update the instruction selector with this new constraint.
Fixed: chromium:1161954
Bug: v8:11282
Change-Id: I5fc9a0315873a3e795078997d87aa92d4c8bddfe
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2603764
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71904}
First step towards the new exception handling proposal:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/125
This is essentially a revert of:
"[wasm] Switch to new 'catch' and 'br_on_exn' proposal."
The changes are:
- "catch" instruction takes a tag immediate,
- "rethrow" instruction takes a label immediate,
- Add "catch_all" instruction,
- Remove "br_on_exn" instruction,
- Do not push exceptions on the stack, only the encoded values
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=aheejin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8091
Change-Id: Iea4d8d5a5d3ad50693f645e93c13e8de117aa884
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2484514
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71602}
Safepoint maps record all spill slots that contain a tagged value. The
introduction of multi-value return changed the stack frame layout though
and the calculation of spill slots has not been adjusted accordingly.
This CL adjusts the creation of safepoints now to work for multi-value
returns as well.
R=neis@chromium.org
Bug: v8:11206
Change-Id: Id623dbc28b976dcf625ac78738e03e642fafbb36
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2569762
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71591}
The {ParallelRegisterMove} at the end of {AtomicLoad} might need a
temporary scratch register for spilling values to the stack. Make sure
that one is available by giving up the scratch register used for the
address of the atomic access.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1153442
Change-Id: I267c43e2193662c420f96f6683ebd4bbb0e1bca3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2566759
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71564}
The flags were added because scalar lowering was not implemented for the
instructions in the test. Now that scalar lowering is complete, we can
remove these flags.
Fixed: v8:11137
Change-Id: Ic7bdedbfe558fafebe98917fe4e6a7922203ba91
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2565078
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71474}
The arm implementation made the assumption that the {lhs} and {dst}
registers are either the same, or there is no overlap. This assumption
does not hold.
ia32 on the other hand has a lot of complicated logic (and unnecessary
code generation) for different cases of overlap.
This CL fixes the arm issue *and* simplifies the ia32 logic by making
the arm assumption hold, and using it to eliminate special handling on
ia32.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1146861
Change-Id: I8753c2ed70349e735c03293130c899c0c8a3a671
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2526388
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71060}
Test was skipped because the generated test contains multi-byte opcode,
and wasn't correct. Fix up the test with the correct encoding. The
fuzzer now generates multi-byte opcodes correctly, and so shouldn't be
an issue.
Bug: v8:10486
Change-Id: I1f5ad7d456320a30da6c553f65fdca0fc86a291a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2505238
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70864}
For deserialized modules the compilation state was not set to
kFinishedTopTierCompilation and co. A consequence was that code that
required top tier compilation to be finished to block indefinitely.
With this CL the compilation state is initialized properly.
I tested this CL locally with the regression test mentioned in the bug
tracker issue. However, this regression test required to run this test
twice in separate processes. It would be possible to write a regression
test for this that runs on the bots, but I considered it not worth it.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:11024
Change-Id: Ib4e75eae03fab13a3ff013118fc1f33a1278b33f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2494930
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70757}
The register that holds the {new_value} for the AtomicCompareExchange8U
has to be a byte register on ia32. There was code to guarantee that, but
after that code there was code that frees the {eax} register, and that
code moved the {new_value} to a different register again. With this CL
we first free {eax}, and then find a byte register for the {new_value}.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1140549
Change-Id: I1679f3f9ab26c5416ea251c7925366ff43336d85
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2491031
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70721}
This trap now used for all runtime type errors thrown when interfacing
with JS. Its name and message have been changed to reflect this.
Additional change: Remove the trap from the list of traps used
exclusively for RuntimeError (as opposed to TypeError) in
wasm-module-builder.js.
Change-Id: I517766837a60d94b562d4c0de922d52db786b635
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2488688
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70682}
Preparing for tail call is usually done by emitting the gap moves and
then moving the stack pointer to its new position. An optimization
consists in moving the stack pointer first and transforming some of the
moves into pushes. In the attached case it looks like this (arm):
138 add sp, sp, #40
13c str r6, [sp, #-4]!
140 str r6, [sp, #-4]!
144 str r6, [sp, #-4]!
148 str r6, [sp, #-4]!
14c str r6, [sp, #-4]!
...
160 vldr d1, [sp - 4*3]
The last line is a gap reload, but because the stack pointer was already
moved, the slot is now below the stack pointer. This is invalid and
triggers this DCHECK:
Fatal error in ../../v8/src/codegen/arm/assembler-arm.cc, line 402
Debug check failed: 0 <= offset (0 vs. -12).
A comment already explains that we skip the optimization if the gap
contains stack moves to prevent this, but the code only checks for
non-FP slots. This is fixed by replacing "source.IsStackSlot()" with
"source.IsAnyStackSlot()":
108 vldr d1, [sp + 4*2]
...
118 str r0, [sp, #+36]
11c str r0, [sp, #+32]
120 str r0, [sp, #+28]
124 str r0, [sp, #+24]
128 str r0, [sp, #+20]
...
134 add sp, sp, #20R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1137608
Change-Id: If2b85dde49bf31a6bd3f5e0255407f9390727f9d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2474784
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70603}
Whenever more then one value is pushed to the stack, we need to execute
a check for growing the stack first (since https://crrev.com/c/2431525).
This CL adds two missing checks.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1137582
Change-Id: I9755502dfdb77c03d1dde3e83fb7d33b9b99e499
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2467796
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70480}
LoadTransform operators contain a LoadKind, which can be unaligned,
protected, poisoned, normal.
If it is protected, we cannot eliminiate that load,
since we rely on the segv signal handling. So, we use partial template
specialization on LoadKind::kProtected, and don't set the operator to
not be eliminatable.
Bug: chromium:1132461
Change-Id: If45fc6562348ffd4dbaa27058e6c5d4242f79abb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2436081
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70205}
These instructions were changed from "s8x16" to "i8x16" prefixes in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/321.
This CL updates all V8 code, including arch-specific code, to match.
Bug: v8:10946, v8:10933
Change-Id: I26ef9ad77571f94501d42c1d65f57380fd507f3d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2432068
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70143}
In atomic.notify we overwrote the register which stored the index,
without checking if it was still in use or not.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10898
Change-Id: I59ed7a2c1f1342ff4252e3c4d33822111caee82c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2426616
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70125}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes compared to last reland:
- Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a
computed property.
- Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag.
- Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant.
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
The emitted safepoint entries had the wrong size, because it did not
contain StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. The code still
worked because the indices of encoded in the entries where too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp and thereby corrected
the invalid size. It worked as follows:
First the stack_slots_size gets calculated from the safepoint entry.
Then the position of a stack slot was
"frame_header_base + stack_slots_size - index * pointer_size", where
"index" is what is encoded in the safepoint map. Because of the incorrect
encoding, both stack_slot_size and index were too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. Therefore the errors in
both values eliminated each other, making the end result correct.
With --print-code, the safepoint entry size was also read, and it
crashed because the encoded value was too low.
The reland fixes the indices.
Original message:
With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
externref.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I88444e57745d7b9fe8f1630e904d49736fa9d720
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398531
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69786}
Due to the way SSE flags work, we need to enable all versions prior to
SSE 4.1 as well.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I50ddd3f486641e7bf22c651fc2c9a8a4ccbc2b46
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391325
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69687}
The test is incompatible with --noenable-sse4-1, which is randomly
added by numfuzz (and possibly other fuzzers).
The "Flags" from the test files are always passed last and are often
used to neuter incompatible flags.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I8fd11b4d38586f25f5af63ab8ef83873dc250557
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2389982
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69665}
With a recent change, we require WebAssembly code to be tiered up to
serialize it, see https://crrev.com/c/2349290. In that CL tests were
adjusted to set the --wasm-tier-up flag when serialization was involved.
However, the test adjusted in this CL was missing, because this test
used the kExprRefNull instruction, which caused a bailout to TurboFan
anyways. With recent changes, Liftoff can compile kExprRefNull now,
and therefore causes problems.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10852
Change-Id: I9b89f37c22f17cbf046110f3ee1c98bfea73e009
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387574
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69648}
For SIMD instructions that use aligned moves (like movaps or movapd), we
don't have correct memory alignment for SIMD moves yet. Switch to to
movupd.
Bug: v8:9198
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Ic60fba5d08dda9676f6091ce505ac7be54957d00
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2380240
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69613}
Load extends always load 8 bytes, so the access size does not depend on
MachineType of the load. The MachineType is used for classifying the
lane shape of the 8-byte load.
Also add cctest to load splats and load extends to test OOB. (Note that
load splats access size depends on MachineType).
Add regression test from clusterfuzz, minimized by ahaas@. Remove the
`--no-wasm-trap-handler` flag since we have a no_wasm_traps variant that
should test this flag.
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I27ba051d0536ca0f6fd75dd641ca9b78132dafed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2363291
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69489}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This is a reland of 57242a051e
no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
