The {operator==} on {VarState} did not check the spill offset, so when
merging stack states, we forgot to move stack values if both source and
destination were stack slots, but at different offsets.
This CL fixes this by removing the {operator==}, because the semantics
(and use) are not clear, and it's only used in one place anyway.
The equality check was mostly redundant, so inlining it also makes the
code smaller and faster.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10702
Change-Id: I6c8b2cfd1002274175c9a17d305692e4631fd7dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2304574
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68916}
For 64-bit binary operations, Liftoff on arm made the assumption that
register pairs are always ordered, i.e. the register code for the low
word is lower than the register code for the high word.
Ensuring this was only implemented in {GetUnusedRegister} in
https://crrev.com/c/2168875. Other cases were missing though, e.g.
return values, but also different places were we
construct register pairs internally.
Thus, this CL removes this constraint again and instead handles
unordered register pairs in 64-bit binary operations on arm.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1101304
Change-Id: I4cd9fb1577f82ab06d34c9dde6533cf04a2cade7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2287870
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68752}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The IsInBounds function is used in a few different places, when used for
bounds checks on 32-bit platforms, size_t for max_memory_size leads to
incorrect out of bounds accesses as size_t is not guaranteed to be
64-bit on all platforms. Use specific uint32_t, uint64_t methods for
Wasm bounds checking instead of size_t.
Bug: chromium:1080902
Change-Id: I0e21f0a310382c8ed0703c8302200d3352495c13
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2256858
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68500}
Due to recent spec changes, this CL removes the type immediate of
ref.is_null again. Instead we check if the type of the input parameter
is nullable.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: If07d30fe4dd27664be7774422573b2ab2b0dfa20
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2247654
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68484}
The reference types wasm proposal dropped all subtyping. Subsequently,
the 'anyref' type was renamed to externref.
This changes all references of the *type* anyref to externref.
Additionally, the flag that permits this extension is renamed to
"reftypes" to mirror the proposal name.
Bug: v8:7748
Change-Id: Icf323f13b9660fd10540e65125af053fca3a03f9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2232941
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68270}
Even in unreachable code, the targets of br_table have to have matching
types.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I2e85df3cb92f7910a6bcb5ac03927c424194660d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2218062
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68148}
With recent changes to the anyref proposal, null refs now have a type
immediate which declares the type of a null ref constant. Likewise,
the RefIsNull instruction is type aware now. This CL addresses these
proposal changes now.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I810dfa3a4ab4389afc9639f897cee5d43e9b62cb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215172
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68141}
This reverts commit 76debfda32.
Reason for revert: Nullptr access in new test: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/37265
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][liftoff] Fix I64x2Mul
>
> The I64x2Mul overwrote the lhs/rhs if they are the same as dst. So when
> deciding if we need temporaries, we should not only check the
> cache_state, but whether they alias dst or not.
>
> Bug: chromium:1088273
> Change-Id: I82efa9b45e0a3d321a06efde60971ce95b21490f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2225796
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68114}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5fd337b71d82d262d36ff410077a11c17b50036b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1088273
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2226756
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68117}
The I64x2Mul overwrote the lhs/rhs if they are the same as dst. So when
deciding if we need temporaries, we should not only check the
cache_state, but whether they alias dst or not.
Bug: chromium:1088273
Change-Id: I82efa9b45e0a3d321a06efde60971ce95b21490f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2225796
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68114}
The proposal uses the lane shape, e.g. i64x2.anytrue, and we were using
s1x2.anytrue in our opcodes. This was a legacy naming, because we were
trying to bitpack the booleans. Now that we aren't doing that, rename
these to be more consistent with the proposal.
This was done with a straightforward sed script, changing both cpp code
and also some comments in mjsunit test files.
Bug: v8:10506
Change-Id: If077ed805de23520d8580d6b3b1906c80f67b94f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2207915
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67945}
Registers cannot be used as a merge destination if they have more than
one use, otherwise the merge will unexpectedly affect other uses of that
register.
R=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1084151
Change-Id: I0d6ad97c585920357a37d95361e0320d32c71f4b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2208851
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67904}
The lowering for anytrue was assuming that the input nodes are all
integers. The regression test added in https://crrev.com/c/2194471 calls
anytrue with float operands, this was causing the lowering to generate
cmpl instructions with a float register and an immediate, which is
wrong.
The fix is to use GetReplacementsWithType on the input nodes, but
only if the input were floats, since we use Word32Equal.
Drive-by clean up of comments in the aforementioned regression test.
Bug: v8:10535
Change-Id: I4de89516c178e9003a4c745808d831be87918381
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2203400
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67878}
The AVX implementation does not have dst == input(0), so the vminps call
was wrong. The intention is to compare the 2 input operands.
Bug: chromium:1081030
Change-Id: Id54074327a6aca4b75988fc9d85beccfeabfc791
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2194471
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67786}
In the existing code we used a register of the UseScratchRegisterScope
for the destination address. However, this register is needed for the
ParallelRegisterMove as well. With this CL we use fixed registers for
the destination address and the offset as well. The CL also changes the
implementation of CalculateActualAddress to allow to set an explicit
register for the result.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10108, chromium:1079449
Change-Id: I39c11b9ffa5f3e937ce4820b9991482ad711b4b0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2192652
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67702}
- Update opcode numbers, tests
- As the wasm-module-builder currently assumes opcode bytes, skip
the test that needs a multi-byte leb128 opcode
- Renumber post-MVP opcodes
Change-Id: I6531e954e63986dc6f7a3144ec054d16e6dc1b05
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2173952
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67517}
Spilling a register in Liftoff require a scratch register when the
offset of the stack slot from fp is greater than 2^12. This CL adds
a check to LiftoffAssembler::Spill on arm to check that a scratch
register is available. It also fixes one case where the scratch register
was not available.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=zhin@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1075953
Change-Id: Idb2bc7e26e3d4fbd6bb0eb6c9a9b8cfd8b3c569e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2172424
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67494}
With this CL the registers in a register pair get ordered such that the
low word register always has a lower register code than the high word
register. This should allow easier reasoning about the register
allocation, and prevent some register allocation bugs.
Background: for many operations in Liftoff, input registers are reused
as output registers. With register pairs, input register pairs are
reused as output register pairs. Additional reasoning, and sometimes
even additional code is needed when the registers of the output register
pair are swapped, i.e. when the high word register of the input becomes
the low word register of the output. With this CL the additional
reasoning is not necessary anymore, as the high word and low word
registers would get swapped during register allocation.
Additionally this CL fixes the logic of the last_spilled_regs list. This
list stored the last spilled registers, but recorded only one of the two
registers of a register pair. With this CL, both registers get recorded.
This CL does not have a regression test. The regression test was more
than 9000 lines long, and quite slow. I was not able to minimize it
substantially. The test would be fragile by nature, as it has to create
a special register configuration or otherwise does not test anything
meaningful. All in all I think it's better not to add the test.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1074586
Change-Id: I4b2475b0c6537c7ce2e51fee281388cdd85f2953
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2168875
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67473}
In AtomicOp64 ClearRegister is called twice to clear the registers r8
and r9. Thereby new registers may get allocated. We forgot to add the
newly allocated registers to pinned after the first call to
ClearRegister, which caused the same registers to be allocated again in
the second ClearRegister, and thereby caused the bug.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: I0d069aea4c9438fe30c30c22406b4075ddf3e95c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2170088
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67445}
This removes the {RedirectToWasmInterpreter} runtime function and the
respective method from {WasmDebugInfo}.
Some tests test specifically the interaction between compiled code and
the interpreter. They are irrelevant now and are deleted.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10389
Change-Id: I38330fcb523f7c65968fdf03abc60af3392bdcc8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164793
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67427}
The interpreter will be moved to be test-only, hence
--wasm-interpret-all also needs to be removed.
Since we don't have any non-compiling tier any more, we also remove the
implication from --jitless to --wasm-lazy-compilation. Instead, we add
another CHECK that we can't be in jitless mode if we trigger any wasm
compilation.
All tests that just ran other tests and additionally passed
--wasm-interpret-all become redundant and are deleted. Also all
regression tests that explicitly specify --wasm-interpret-all are not
needed any more.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10389
Change-Id: I5ddf20a842117a6c05e277a5308f5cfe42e6bfa5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164792
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67419}
This relands commit 1a38573f9d.
The original change used a sequence of instruction in the test that
could not be scalar lowered properly.
Original change's description:
> [arm] Change fp_fixed registers to be allocatable registers
>
> fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 are used by the S8x16Shuffle operation. They
> need to be allocatable, so that they can be correctly marked as fixed
> and spilled as required. The previous value of fp_fixed2, d29, is not in
> the list of allocatable double registers, and not marked as fixed
> appropriately.
>
> One fix could be to extend the list of allocatable double registers, but
> there is a comment there saying that the list is kept even-length to
> make stack alignment easier. So rather than messing with that, we
> instead change what fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 is, since S8x16Shuffle is
> the only user, this is a simpler change.
>
> Bug: chromium:1070078
> Change-Id: Id7de9b256bad2cfb11b0f06b66eb80a48ff7827c
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2161565
> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67372}
Bug: chromium:1070078
Change-Id: I02bb4b3ad03817318cbd0ee706c5ef4f20c845ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2165867
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67406}
This reverts commit 390ed4b934.
Reason for revert: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/36714?
Original change's description:
> [arm] Change fp_fixed registers to be allocatable registers
>
> fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 are used by the S8x16Shuffle operation. They
> need to be allocatable, so that they can be correctly marked as fixed
> and spilled as required. The previous value of fp_fixed2, d29, is not in
> the list of allocatable double registers, and not marked as fixed
> appropriately.
>
> One fix could be to extend the list of allocatable double registers, but
> there is a comment there saying that the list is kept even-length to
> make stack alignment easier. So rather than messing with that, we
> instead change what fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 is, since S8x16Shuffle is
> the only user, this is a simpler change.
>
> Bug: chromium:1070078
> Change-Id: Id7de9b256bad2cfb11b0f06b66eb80a48ff7827c
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2161565
> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67372}
TBR=gdeepti@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org,thibaudm@chromium.org
Change-Id: I00b4b34771b5832cc3d5fe6eac7aac506ec82d50
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1070078
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2165865
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67375}
fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 are used by the S8x16Shuffle operation. They
need to be allocatable, so that they can be correctly marked as fixed
and spilled as required. The previous value of fp_fixed2, d29, is not in
the list of allocatable double registers, and not marked as fixed
appropriately.
One fix could be to extend the list of allocatable double registers, but
there is a comment there saying that the list is kept even-length to
make stack alignment easier. So rather than messing with that, we
instead change what fp_fixed1 and fp_fixed2 is, since S8x16Shuffle is
the only user, this is a simpler change.
Bug: chromium:1070078
Change-Id: Id7de9b256bad2cfb11b0f06b66eb80a48ff7827c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2161565
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67372}
If module bytes end in a prefix like 0xfc (numeric prefix), we read out
of bounds (pc + 1). So, if validate flag is set, check the length.
Bug: chromium:1073553
Change-Id: Ia9771419d01f2315723d19dd96630172b5a7a1f5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2161404
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67370}
SIMD opcodes consist of the prefix byte, then an LEB128 encoded int. We
were decoding this incorrectly as a fixed uint8. This fixes the decoder
to properly handle multi bytes.
In some cases, the multi byte logic is applied to all prefixed opcodes.
This is not a problem, since for values < 0x80, the LEB encoding is a
single byte, and decodes to the same int. If the prefix opcode has
instructions with index >= 0x80, it would be required to be LEB128
encoded anyway.
There are a bunch of trivial changes to test-run-wasm-simd, to change
the macro from BUILD to BUILD_V, the former only works for single byte
opcodes, the latter is a new template-based macro that correct handles
multi-byte opcodes. The only unchanged test is the shuffle fuzzer test,
which builds its own sequence of bytes without using the BUILD macro.
Bug: v8:10258
Change-Id: Ie7377e899a7eab97ecf28176fd908babc08d0f19
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2118476
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67186}
When memory.grow was executed concurrently on multiple threads a data
race could happen such that two memory.grow operations result in the
same return value. With this CL the return value of memory.grow is
unique, given that memory.grow actually grows the memory.
As a concrete example, assume a shared WebAssembly memory initially has
a size of 100. Assume two threads call memory.grow concurrently with a
parameter `10`. Then with the existing code, memory would grow correctly
to a size of 120, but the data race may cause both memory.grow
operations to return 100. With the change in this CL one memory.grow
operation would return 100, the other would return 110.
R=gdeepti@chromium.orgCC=rreverser@google.com
Bug: chromium:1067621
Change-Id: Ib22b5135714a56799e0818ccb39e5dce327e5f8e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2144113
Reviewed-by: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67135}
This relands commit 7d955faa76.
Changed the test case to use i16x8 splat instead of i8x16 splat,
the latter was causing issues when doing scalar lowering. This
change still causes the regression test to fail without the fix.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][x64][ia32] Do not overwrite input register
>
> We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
> masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
>
> Bug: chromium:1065599
> Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
Bug: chromium:1065599
Change-Id: I0dc78ddb013652ef88c07d065c3f6877937c5300
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2136220
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67026}
This reverts commit 7d955faa76.
Reason for revert: Bad change, modified wrong test file https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/36416
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][x64][ia32] Do not overwrite input register
>
> We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
> masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
>
> Bug: chromium:1065599
> Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
TBR=gdeepti@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I50c57906d6eb49758584b477c971179ea3c6e5d3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1065599
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2134655
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67000}
We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
Bug: chromium:1065599
Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
Double literals without dots should still be parsed as double constants,
not unsigned constants. The static_cast would remove the fractional
part, making constants like "1e-15" come out as "0" unsigned constants.
The precise semantics is not spec'ed, so we still consider literals like
"1e1" to be unsigned, and only switch to double if there is a fractional
part.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1065635
Change-Id: I0aac018058a149632e0849572d19fdcc7b2af7aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2126922
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66949}
If "use asm" is used inside a "function*" or async function, it should
bail out.
Drive-by: Minor cleanup in {Runtime_InstantiateAsmJs}.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1065852
Change-Id: Ice48126b803a30c4b4ff7b5ae22df85a3f36198a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2126920
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66939}
Move the recently introduced extra check for 32-bit platforms so
that it covers all code paths that would be hit by custom/future
memory limit settings.
Bug: chromium:1057094
Change-Id: I5e2217a24578ee82c7bfa753b7d5dcd3d00e1b7c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083300
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66568}
Move load splat and load extend ops into the list of SIMD memory
opcodes, since they similarly take an i32 and an memarg. This fixes the
OpcodeLength calculation in function-body-decoder-impl.h.
And in turn, fixes the mjsunit test code that the fuzzer generates. See
the regress-1055692.js file for the weird S8x16LoadSplat followed by 2
kExprUnreachable, where the kExprUnreachable really is a memarg
{0x0, 0x0}. This bug was caught by the fuzzer, and that was the
generated test (with small fixes to add kExprDrop), so leaving it as it
is.
Bug: chromium:1055692
Change-Id: I743b6beb82350b5fea22c8dd10b546a02741cfed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071401
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66439}
This is a reland of 03d5a7ba9b
Nothing changed here compared to the original test. The tests on the
blink side were invalid, I fixed them in https://crrev.com/c/2066907.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] The name of a custom section can cause a validation error
>
> The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
> a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
> Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
> error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
> decode the name of the custom section.
>
> In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
> This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
> compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
> The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
> to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
> CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10126
> Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
Bug: v8:10126
Change-Id: I48aaed8eb9899da1703030fb6809fe46a6e66191
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2069325
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66431}
This is a reland of 548fda4afb
regress-1054466 is modified to not use 64x2 operations, since that was
causing problems on noavx/nosse builds, which requires scalar lowering,
and scalar lowering for 64x2 ops is not implemented.
Original change's description:
> [liftoff] Check fp_pair when looking up register for reuse
>
> Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
> and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
> check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
>
> Bug: chromium:1054466
> Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
Bug: chromium:1054466
Change-Id: If88f1ff2fb17aaa3727758cda5b368be1c6d9bd6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071396
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66423}
This reverts commit 548fda4afb.
Reason for revert: Segfault on nosse bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/35905?
Original change's description:
> [liftoff] Check fp_pair when looking up register for reuse
>
> Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
> and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
> check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
>
> Bug: chromium:1054466
> Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I56f13406ef3cc3793c9d0e2273c4dc5fb0e3de38
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1054466
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2069327
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66405}
Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
Bug: chromium:1054466
Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
Make sure the "initial pages" memory limit is enforced correctly and
throws a CompileError when exceeded.
Bump the "maximum pages" memory limit to 65536.
The --wasm-max-mem-pages flag now controls the "initial pages" limit;
the "maximum pages" limit is always 65536 as spec'ed.
This CL depends on https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/pull/1121.
Bug: v8:7881, v8:8633
Change-Id: I68d07cef56633b8b8ce3b3d047c14e1096daf547
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2035876
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66400}
This reverts commit 03d5a7ba9b.
Reason for revert: Needs rebaseline:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/3243
Original change's description:
> [wasm] The name of a custom section can cause a validation error
>
> The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
> a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
> Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
> error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
> decode the name of the custom section.
>
> In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
> This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
> compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
> The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
> to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
> CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10126
> Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5a7ea265ce47b9e685a5056bb83db6dc58f774a9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10126
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2065168
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66356}
The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
decode the name of the custom section.
In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10126
Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
The previous code was relying on {compilation_unit_builder_} to check if
a section was after or before the code section. This only works for the
first section after code section, since the compilation unit builder is
then reset. Use an additional field to track this instead.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1051912
Change-Id: Id1dfa803ecde2cf77f206ea781c007fc61168942
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2054099
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66265}
If we need a byte register, but {src} is none, we should definitely use
another register.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1048241
Fixed: chromium:1048241
Change-Id: I3396826986e1823250ad6855b84f4b05faaf3b90
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2036073
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66095}
As discussed offline, the current implementation implement each
situation separately. I think we can simplify the code a lot by sharing
code between the different paths.
This CL does that by
1) implementing the kI64Store case separately, because it does not have
all the register contraints that the others have, and
2) moving all logic to ensure that the {src} register is usable before
the switch, such that it's shared by all the compare-exchange cases.
As a side produce, this also fixes issue 1045225, because for i64 stores
which actually only use the lower half of {src}, only that half will be
pinned.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1045225, v8:10108
Change-Id: I0be025b9706d563835ae6337d45b88e0233eacad
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029414
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66062}
There was a bug in the function body decoder where
type checking of brtable only happened if the brtable
instruction is reachable. However, type checking is
required in all cases where brtable "not unreachable".
The difference between reachable and "not unreachable"
is a state called spec-reachable where a clever
compiler can already infer that the code will be
unreachable (e.g. a memory access is out of bounds
just by the offset and therefore unconditionally
traps), but the spec can not. If an instruction is
only spec-reachable, it still has to be type checked.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
FIX=chromium:1046472
Change-Id: I7e9f1108597871615c0d443a0e94de35a0207b5e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2027990
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66049}
