AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
27,289 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags 839 MiB
430bfd1b02
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
conradw
37bf0481de [strong] Add tests for loading from super, loading with access checks 
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219663009

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29448}
 2015-07-02 15:23:48 +00:00
machenbach
365ff33234 Revert of [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks (patchset #4 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/) 
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Breaks gc stress:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20GC%20Stress%20-%202/builds/3968

Original issue's description:
> [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks
>
> Followup for https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/
>
> These seem to already function correctly without the need for further runtime
> changes.
>
> There will be a final follow-up for interceptors.
>
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/ea4e568363f48955e7de6b538e559132e9899c86
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29389}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1218123003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29390}
 2015-06-30 18:43:01 +00:00
conradw
ea4e568363 [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks 
Followup for https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/

These seem to already function correctly without the need for further runtime
changes.

There will be a final follow-up for interceptors.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29389}
 2015-06-30 17:13:21 +00:00
conradw
7281f80151 [strong] Implement strong property access semantics 
Revert "Revert relanded strong property access CL"

Regression issues should be solved. Initial patchset is the original, subsequent patchsets are the fixing modifications.

This reverts commit 4ac7be5656.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1199983002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29384}
 2015-06-30 15:24:43 +00:00
conradw
4ac7be5656 Revert relanded strong property access CL 
Reason:
Regressions in various benchmarks.

Revert "Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002/)"

This reverts commit 41405c0470.

Revert "X87: Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access."

This reverts commit 48de5f4d6b.

Revert "Fix overlapping KeyedLoadIC bitfield."

This reverts commit 4e6c956abf.

Revert "MIPS64: Fix 'Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access'."

This reverts commit 74f97b0d2a.

BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1199493002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29166}
 2015-06-19 19:00:53 +00:00
conradw
41405c0470 Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002/) 
Reason for revert:
Issue was ultimately caused/fixed by https://codereview.chromium.org/1194673002/

Original issue's description:
> Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #23 id:460001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert, maybe breaks GC-stress
>
> http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20GC%20Stress%20-%20custom%20snapshot/builds/808
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access
> >
> > Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.
> >
> > To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super
> >
> > BUG=v8:3956
> > LOG=N
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/85dbfb9a389e7b21bd2a63862202ee97fc5d7982
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}
>
> TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:3956
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/407657b706711fd5f8d417841e24b284886f3776
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29115}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1185343005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29122}
 2015-06-18 17:17:07 +00:00
conradw
407657b706 Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #23 id:460001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/) 
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert, maybe breaks GC-stress

http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20GC%20Stress%20-%20custom%20snapshot/builds/808

Original issue's description:
> [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access
>
> Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.
>
> To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super
>
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/85dbfb9a389e7b21bd2a63862202ee97fc5d7982
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29115}
 2015-06-18 13:40:20 +00:00
conradw
85dbfb9a38 [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access 
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.

To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}
 2015-06-18 11:55:45 +00:00