Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
adamk
7b556cd24f Split default parameters that require destructuring into their own file
This allows testing the configuration where --harmony-default-parameters
is passed without --harmony-destructuring.

R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:2160
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1410023015

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31863}
2015-11-06 15:49:01 +00:00
adamk
163419e8fa Remove --harmony-arrow-functions flag
Arrow functions have been enabled by default since the 4.5 branch.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1373633002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31031}
2015-09-30 19:50:40 +00:00
conradw
77394fa05a [parser] disallow language mode directive in body of function with non-simple parameters
TC39 agreed to disallow "use strict" directives in function body when
non-simple parameter lists are used.

This is a continuation of caitp's CL https://codereview.chromium.org/1281163002/
with some refactorings removed for now.

Still TODO: there is a lot of duplication between the is_simple field of
FormalParametersBase and the NonSimpleParameter property ExpressionClassifier
keeps track of. It should be possible to remove the former with a minor
refactoring of arrow function parsing. This will be attempted in a follow-up CL.

BUG=
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1300103005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30388}
2015-08-26 14:59:19 +00:00
rossberg
089592ad33 [es6] Remaining cases of parameter scopes for sloppy eval
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303013007

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30363}
2015-08-25 22:24:29 +00:00
rossberg
0b3b72671e [es6] Correct length for functions with default parameters
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:2160
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1311163002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30361}
2015-08-25 18:52:13 +00:00
rossberg
365fd7bc35 [es6] Parameter scopes for sloppy eval
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here,

  let x = 1;
  function f(g = () => x) {
    var y
    eval("var x = 2")
    return g() + x  // f() = 3
  }

we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body:

- Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object.

- When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo).

- While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum.

- Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object.

- Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts.

- In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings.

- In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope.

- ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain.

- Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface.

- While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger.

Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled.

@mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts.
@yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff.

R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811,v8:2160
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
2015-08-21 10:58:47 +00:00
rossberg
6dda11ff81 [es6] Implement default parameters
Based on caitp's https://codereview.chromium.org/1127063003/

R=adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:2160
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1287063004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30192}
2015-08-17 12:02:08 +00:00
caitpotter88
904fbc303a Revert of [es6] implement default parameters via desugaring (patchset #19 id:380001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1127063003/)
Reason for revert:
Broken on arm64

Original issue's description:
> [es6] implement default parameters via desugaring
>
> Stage 1 implementation:
>
> - Parameters can't be referenced before initialized (from left-to-right)
> - SingleNameBindings only, no support for BindingPatterns
>
> Known issues:
>
> - Incorrect scoping (parameter expressions may reference variables declared in function body)
> - Function arity is untouched
> - Hole-checking needs work
> - Rest parameters are broken when mixed with optional arguments
>
> BUG=v8:2160
> LOG=N
> R=arv@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/892c85485881f8be2f17bd83238980f858126576
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28739}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,wingo@igalia.com,arv@chromium.org,dslomov@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:2160

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1163853002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28740}
2015-06-01 18:35:03 +00:00
caitpotter88
892c854858 [es6] implement default parameters via desugaring
Stage 1 implementation:

- Parameters can't be referenced before initialized (from left-to-right)
- SingleNameBindings only, no support for BindingPatterns

Known issues:

- Incorrect scoping (parameter expressions may reference variables declared in function body)
- Function arity is untouched
- Hole-checking needs work
- Rest parameters are broken when mixed with optional arguments

BUG=v8:2160
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1127063003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28739}
2015-06-01 17:10:50 +00:00