This CL implements a generic baseline version of Array.p.unshift
in Torque, enabling us to remove the JS fall-back.
The elements-accessor fast-path is still used, but the check whether
to use it is also moved to Torque.
Support for sparse JSArrays is removed.
Drive-by change: Small refactoring in builtins-array that will
get extended to other array builtins in a follow-up CL.
R=cbruni@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7624
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: I7b23ce15e7b922eb333f61a408050dedec77c95a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1189902
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55670}
The previous behavior, which caused Array.prototype.unshift() (with no args)
to have side-effects, no longer matches the spec (ES6 changed the no-arg behavior
in April 2014). The new SmartMove behavior is also compatible with current
versions of Firefox.
This is a baby step towards getting rid of SmartMove; it isolates the test
change in this patch, instead of lumping it in confusingly with all the
other test updates necessary for moving away from SmartMove.
R=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/666883009
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24854 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This is one step in the direction of fixing a range of small bugs in the array methods when dealing with non-standard element attributes.
Added tests exercising this behavior for shift and unshift.
For Proxies and Interceptors, the behavior of %GetArrayKeys is now to just return an interval, rather than trying to list all their indexed properties. In the Proxy case, this seems like the only way to avoid an observable difference between smart and non-smart array methods. For Interceptors, the usual case (in WebKit, anyway) is for them to have all indices in [0, length), so enumerating them won't be any better than simply iterating over that range.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/12653010
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14057 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
