Implementations factored out from Array. Tests are derived from
normal array toString tests.
BUG=v8:3578
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1166623004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28766}
This also fixes issues with
- kMaxUint32 being a valid length but not index cornercases
- exotic integer objects masking "exotic indexes" even though its in the prototype chain
- concating of holey sloppy arguments
BUG=v8:4137
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1159433003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28754}
Stage 1 implementation:
- Parameters can't be referenced before initialized (from left-to-right)
- SingleNameBindings only, no support for BindingPatterns
Known issues:
- Incorrect scoping (parameter expressions may reference variables declared in function body)
- Function arity is untouched
- Hole-checking needs work
- Rest parameters are broken when mixed with optional arguments
BUG=v8:2160
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1127063003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28739}
This splits the SuperReference AST node into SuperPropertyReference and
SuperCallReference. The super call reference node consists of three
unresolved vars to this, new.target and this_function. These gets
declared when the right function is entered and if it is in use. The
variables gets assigned in FullCodeGenerator::Generate.
BUG=v8:3768
LOG=N
R=wingo@igalia.com, adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1146863007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28731}
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the behaviour of the
delete operator for strong objects.
Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.
Attempt 2, last version did not work with API.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1156573002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28724}
The point of this change is so that when emitting code for a call in
FullCodegen::VisitCall, the statement position is not associated to
any code that loads the function, but to the actual CallIC.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:481896
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1157543004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28701}
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on changing a strong object's
writable, non-configurable property to non-writable.
Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1142393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28698}
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the ability of user code
to modify the prototype of strong objects.
Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1143623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28664}
Strong Object/Array literals are currently being created with incorrect
internal prototypes. This CL fixes this and extends the test suite to check.
BUG=
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1158933002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28655}
When we enter a method that needs access to the [[HomeObject]]
we allocate a local variable `.home_object` and assign it the
value from the [[HomeObject]] private symbol. Something along
the lines of:
method() {
var .home_object = %ThisFunction()[home_object_symbol];
...
}
BUG=v8:3867, v8:4031
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1135243004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28644}
The April 14 2015 final draft of the ES6 specification states that the
`prototype` property of generator function instances should be writable.
BUG=v8:4140, v8:4140
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153633003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28641}
* Hash code is now just done with a private own symbol instead of the hidden string, which predates symbols.
* In the long run we should do all hidden properties this way and get rid of the
hidden magic 0-length string with the zero hash code. The advantages include
less complexity and being able to do things from JS in a natural way.
* Initially, the performance of weak set regressed, because it's a little harder
to do the lookup in C++. Instead of heroics in C++ to make things faster I
moved some functionality into JS and got the performance back. JS is supposed to be good at looking up named properties on objects.
* This also changes hash codes of Smis so that they are always Smis.
Performance figures are in the comments to the code review. Summary: Most of js-perf-test/Collections is neutral. Set and Map with object keys are 40-50% better. WeakMap is -5% and WeakSet is +9%. After the measurements, I fixed global proxies, which cost 1% on most tests and 5% on the weak ones :-(.
In the code review comments is a patch with an example of the heroics we could do in C++ to make lookup faster (I hope we don't have to do this. Instead of checking for the property, then doing a new lookup to insert it, we could do one lookup and handle the addition immediately). With the current benchmarks above this buys us nothing, but if we go back to doing more lookups in C++ instead of in stubs and JS then it's a win.
In a similar vein we could give the magic zero hash code to the hash code
symbol. Then when we look up the hash code we would sometimes see the table
with all the hidden properties. This dual use of the field for either the hash
code or the table with all hidden properties and the hash code is rather ugly,
and this CL gets rid of it. I'd be loath to bring it back. On the benchmarks quoted above it's slightly slower than moving the hash code lookup to JS like in this CL.
One worry is that the benchmark results above are more monomorphic than real
world code, so may be overstating the performance benefits of moving to JS. I
think this is part of a general issue we have with handling polymorphic code in
JS and any solutions there will benefit this solution, which boils down to
regular property access. Any improvement there will lift all boats.
R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149863005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28622}
This fixes a corner-case where deoptimization while evaluating the
value to a __proto__ property after computed property names appeared
in an object literal, lead to environments not being in sync with
unoptimized code.
R=arv@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/harmony/computed-property-names-deopt
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1158443004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28613}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
First steps only, the TurboFan compilation is still triggered from C++ land.
Includes some simplifications/cleanups, too.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1150263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28581}
Also support patterns in ``for (var p in/of ...)``
This CL extends the rewriting we used to do for ``for (let p in/of...)`` to
``for (var p in/of ...)``. For all for..in/of loop declaring variable,
we rewrite
for (var/let/const pattern in/of e) b
into
for (x' in/of e) { var/let/const pattern = e; b }
This adds a small complication for debugger: for a statement
for (var v in/of e) ...
we used to have
var v;
for (v in/of e) ...
and there was a separate breakpoint on ``var v`` line.
This breakpoint is actually useless since it is immediately followed by
a breakpoint on evaluation of ``e``, so this CL removes that breakpoint
location.
Similiraly, for let, it used to be that
for (let v in/of e) ...
became
for (x' in/of e) { let v; v = x'; ... }
``let v``generetaed a useless breakpoint (with the location at the
loop's head. This CL removes that breakpoint as well.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149043005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28565}
This allows you to put iterables into your array literals
and the will get spread into the array.
let x = [0, ...range(1, 3)]; // [0, 1, 2]
This is done by treating the array literal up to the first
spread element as usual, including using a boiler plate
array, and then appending the remaining expressions and rest
expressions.
BUG=v8:3018
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1125183008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28534}
Previously this patch was attempted with reduce and reduceRight included;
however, some of those tests crashed in the trybots. This version has
just map, fiter and some, together with their tests.
R=arv@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3578
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1145013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28529}
