Use same value to rethrow as was used before this change. This doesn't
appear to be explicitly tested anywhere, but the behavior should stay
unchanged nevertheless.
Change-Id: Idaed90a143e9775746f034190918065897094acb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329684
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Clifford <danno@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57472}
This reduces the build steps after touching counters.h from 710 to 191, thus
detaching counters.h from the giant include cluster.
BUG=v8:7490,v8:8238
Change-Id: I0c7e707fb945e293f8a5604cc8da438cd35b3210
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329695
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57468}
Just moving code around a bit.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7921
Change-Id: I6a9f9dab41360e9a0d8249fe77260788151cd88b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1333411
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57466}
We were outputting the address of the WasmCodeManager instead of the
native module.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I70f0aca4ef9126b91fcc3716570bfc69e71d27c7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1326024
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57465}
For some reason the C++ compiler fails to realise that next_ cannot
change on entry into Scan from Next, and re-loads it, creating what
looks like a data dependency that stalls the next instruction.
Passing through a cached next_ value cleans up the generated code.
Change-Id: Iab62ed1890a3a720e5fa90a90e802305e3d55a82
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1331551
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57464}
Use a flag int instead of bit fields in LiteralBuffer, so that
cache the output of next() in Scanner::Scan() so that it doesn't get
reloaded between LiteralBuffer::Drop() calls.
LiteralBuffer: :Drop can set a single value rather than masking. Also,
Change-Id: I977703488ac41e3b091f46ce0840e7c464639073
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1331548
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57463}
We're fetching the symbols anyway, so we might as well use those instead in the
preparser.
Change-Id: Ie937c755690cdd7b15e8486aa9680d530eff602e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1332296
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57460}
An oversight in my previous change (3b64764b1d) could
cause a CHECK failure.
Bug: chromium:904707
Change-Id: Ie5f1c500bddc00741b889f78ae9ecd9af581ba5c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1333409
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57459}
Previously, the following call sequence was always made when creating resulting
subsetted TypedArray:
1) TFJ TypedArrayPrototypeSubArray
2) TFS TypedArrayConstructor
3) TFS CreateTypedArray
This CL, skips #2 and goes straight to #3 when the default constructor (builtin) is
safe to use (IsPrototypeTypedArrayPrototype and
!IsTypedArraySpeciesProtectorCellInvalid).
Local TypedArrays/SubarrayNoSpecies microbenchmark shows ~35-40% improvement...
BEFORE
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1033530
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1018490
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1037030
AFTER
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1439030
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1417540
TypedArrays-SubarrayNoSpecies(Score): 1405980
Bug: v8:7161
Change-Id: I356dace36570aa161ffe208a57a80e46714121a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1331154
Commit-Queue: Peter Wong <peter.wm.wong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57458}
It's not sufficient to check the NoElements protector because that
doesn't guard against the array having a custom prototype.
Bug: v8:8449
Change-Id: I843815466a1e4ae197a2b76eec62d04cdc2d619d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1332232
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57457}
This matches the pre-torque behavior when the receiver's length
was greater than the max array length.
Bug: chromium:902672
Change-Id: Icf8ae3a1a4acc0680ce1b709f5b3372892337203
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1330921
Commit-Queue: Peter Wong <peter.wm.wong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57456}
This CL updates DetachableVector to store the data at a known place
instead of in an std::vector<>, so that builtins can update it directly.
Bug: v8:8124
Change-Id: Iba5fb2e9d4e0ddc689d0f7eeaea40bc3218edf3a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1297783
Commit-Queue: Taiju Tsuiki <tzik@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57452}
See the WebAssembly bulk memory proposal here:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations
This initial CL adds a wasm experimental flag:
`--experimental-wasm-bulk-memory`, and also parsing of passive segments.
A passive segment is one that is not copied into the table/memory on
instantiation, but instead later via the `{table,memory}.init`
instructions.
The binary format of passive data segments is unlikely to change, but
the format for passive element segments may change (see
https://github.com/WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations/pull/39).
Bug: v8:7747
Change-Id: I2a7fb9bc7648a722a8c4aab4185c68d3d0843858
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1330015
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57451}
because for some reason gdb does not want to execute
job *handle
anymore.
Bug: v8:8238
Change-Id: I9b632f5d34048b80e1f9542de963f738f1afb613
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1332230
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57449}
With this change, the return value is not baked into the translations
for lazy deoptimization point. Instead, the translation contains
a position where the return value(s) should be written by
the deoptimizer. The deoptimizer then constructs the frame as it
would look before and during the call and then overwrites the relevant
slot(s) with the return value(s) from the callee.
The advantage is that we do not run the risk of overwriting captured
objects in the tranlations. Moreover, the translations correctly reflect
the frame during the call (e.g., if it is inspected by the debugger or
if an exception is thrown and no value is returned).
Bug: chromium:902608
Change-Id: I03824f0efec3dd476feacbcc0ab6102c3e6c94bf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329203
Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57446}
This CL splits the backend of TurboFan off into its own directory,
without changing namespaces. This makes ownership management a bit
more fine-grained with a logical separation.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org
Change-Id: I2ac40d6ca2c4f04b8474b630aae0286ecf79ef42
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1308333
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57437}
1) For the code space estimate, exclude everything except code.
2) Add some static code size per function.
3) Add some static code size per module.
4) Include signature zone memory.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifa9ac347edf98c2e63ab3201a64ac2e0a3de28e5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1118263
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57436}
After the first decoder error, the streaming processor should not be
called again. To enforce this, reset the {processor_} field. This also
makes the {ok_} field redundant.
Note that this refactoring is also necessary for a future CL which
makes the {StreamingProcessor} keep the {AsyncCompileJob} alive. By
resetting the processor, we also remove that link.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7921
Change-Id: I42f5ed26a8f26c3dc8db5676557a0d82021e132e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329179
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57435}
This removes unused code (macros.py, runtime functions). As IS_VAR is
now unused we can remove support from the parser.
Bug: v8:7624
Change-Id: Ia1c5e23f4c2caa85310d3f9a557218fc52d200f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329696
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57434}
This is the larger dictionary specialized for Name. To be used as a
property backing store.
More methods and tests will be added in the future as it reaches
parity with NameDictionary.
Bug: v8:6443, v8:7569
Change-Id: I8f5d88b2f6f4e14d4851548566ffa9f59535358b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329204
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57430}
I just ran into this when creating a test case. The huge spread caused
a RangeError (stack overflow). It's not causing problems for the tests
we currently have, but let's fix it anyway.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib67f059f2981ccc6239ba4ae05611e20eb3aa191
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329177
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57429}
Now that identifiers in the preparser also carry their string, we can simply
check that rather than relying on a weird "keyword". Dropping __proto__ as a
keyword allows us to delist '_' as keyword character.
Change-Id: I775df25f77a84de92a60790ca665f16d52abf4bf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329692
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57427}
gcc 4.8 fails to compile an {std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong} with
{memory_order_acq_rel} with this error:
error: invalid failure memory model for ‘__atomic_compare_exchange’
This makes our gcov bot fail:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/luci.v8.ci/V8%20Linux64%20-%20gcov%20coverage/16053
According to the documentation, giving a single {memory_order_acq_rel}
is equivalent to specifying {memory_order_acq_rel} as success memory
order and {memory_order_acquire} for failure. This CL refactors the code
to do this explicitly.
R=ulan@chromium.orgCC=machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8238
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel
Change-Id: Idcc69ee4b4ac53edc4fd1aa28eac7377f08044ce
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329693
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57426}
Now that we have no more do-expressions, we don't need to reparent variables
and declarations anymore. However, it's still possible that temporaries were
implicitly allocated. We still need to move those.
Bug: chromium:904255
Change-Id: Ia8a90eb822b9db123ffb0bad58e4b720c1452d9f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1329685
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57424}
