The index to be traced can be a full (platform-dependent) pointer sized
integer now. This CL prepares memory tracing for that.
As a drive-by, the "address" field is renamed to "offset", or
"effective_offset", depending on the situation.
R=manoskouk@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10949
Change-Id: I1fabfdb57835f041e1310a4eb4024d6254c08752
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2465825
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70477}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes compared to last reland:
- Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a
computed property.
- Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag.
- Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant.
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Previously, all ThisExpression's had kNoSourcePositions leading to
incorrect error messages like this:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: undefined is not a function
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at t (unnamed:1:11)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch allows creation of a ThisExpression with a source position,
leading to a better error message:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: this is not iterable
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: this is not iterable
at t (unnamed:1:32)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch does not remove the existing cached version of
ThisExpression and instead creates a new one when required.
Bug: v8:6513
Change-Id: Idee4fe8946a9b821d06ff4a5e7eaefe54874ec59
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345226
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69300}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The registers were not spilled correctly in liftoff when tracing
function calls, which caused runtime errors.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ic0a9ae8a286bdee8f8440e006d0b47e52241ea5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245595
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68340}
Added wasm tracing support for turbofan with the flag --trace-wasm.
The test suite was updated accordingly.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ie6ee2a05142081416d8572d4d72dcd315e0bf285
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235536
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68253}
Added display of identation, function index, function names and compiler
used when tracing function calls in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I58b4e7b077365bdee7bae9b5ad8a50178c322147
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2230532
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68198}
Added return value display when tracing function calls in wasm.
The new types handled are I32, I64, F32 and F64.
Only single return value is handled.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I726d08fcfdc8bf2c3e43a25ec1932412ff74387b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2225024
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68143}
Added --trace-wasm flag which prints function entry in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I049efeadb0149f4f58ce34a29fd53fbf5688bd4b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215052
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67998}
The serializer currently cannot handle a heap state containing
arbitrary compiled Code objects. As a quick fix for the
--stress-snapshot d8 flag, we clear compiled data from the isolate
prior to the serialize-deserialize-verify pass.
With this change, mjsunit tests pass on x64.
The %SerializeDeserializeNow() runtime function would require more
work, since it is not possible to mutate the heap to this extent while
still preserving a runnable host context and isolate. We will need
another solution there.
Drive-by: Skip the stress_snapshot variant except for the mjsunit
suite.
Tbr: machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10493,v8:10416
Change-Id: Ie110da8b51613fcd69c7f391d3cf8589d6b04dd8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2182429
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67585}
The interpreter will be moved to be test-only, hence
--wasm-interpret-all also needs to be removed.
Since we don't have any non-compiling tier any more, we also remove the
implication from --jitless to --wasm-lazy-compilation. Instead, we add
another CHECK that we can't be in jitless mode if we trigger any wasm
compilation.
All tests that just ran other tests and additionally passed
--wasm-interpret-all become redundant and are deleted. Also all
regression tests that explicitly specify --wasm-interpret-all are not
needed any more.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10389
Change-Id: I5ddf20a842117a6c05e277a5308f5cfe42e6bfa5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164792
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67419}
To avoid shrinking the unregister token map on each pop of the cleared
cell list, the Torque implementation of the cleanup loop avoids
shrinking the map until the end of the loop.
To support that, PopClearedCellHoldings is refactored to the Torque
PopClearedCell which calls the
JSFinalization::RemoveCellFromUnregisterTokenMap and the runtime
ShrinkFinalizationRegistryUnregisterTokenMap. The former cannot GC is
and is implemented in CSA as a fast C call. The latter can GC and is a
runtime call.
This also incidentally makes uses of FinalizationRegistry without
unregister token a fast path that doesn't have to leave Torque.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ia0c3c5800d26e31319a818f164f6bd3267355aa6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137950
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67161}
Previously we use the error message for normal invalid private member
access, so for a failed brand check for class C, the error is
TypeError: Cannot read private member C from an object whose class did not declare it
This updates the message to
TypeError: Object must be an instance of class C
Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: Ida98f46b8387631194a9b7a48bd1f419045ac6e7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2100688
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66923}
We were missing test cases for i16, i64, and f64. It's not super
critical, but it's also an easy addition, and helps bring coverage of
memory-tracing.cc up (close to 100% now).
Change-Id: Ib8433f8615c900d8665ccbc33e12d6fd05d51336
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2121168
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66878}
The deprecated legacy FinalizationGroup APIs are left unchanged for
compat.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I9bdcaa92360db318c96fc8524c04163ece25118e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071236
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66437}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
This is a reland of 31d8ff7ac5
Bug: v8:8179, v8:10190
Change-Id: I704ecf48aeebac1dc2c05ea1c052f6a2560ae332
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2045723
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66208}
This reverts commit 31d8ff7ac5.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/v8/10190
Original change's description:
> [weakrefs] Schedule FinalizationGroup cleanup tasks from within V8
>
> Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
> automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
> - v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
> - v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
>
> If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
> FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
> itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
>
> When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
> associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
> scheduled cleanup.
>
> Bug: v8:8179
> Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
TBR=ulan@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,syg@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: If7869e9a5841803c10e748691f019a7d28f3b62e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2043807
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66190}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
The source position is set to the function call (console.log) not the
spread (..x), in the bytecode generator, as the spread operation is
done as part of the CallWithSpread bytecode.
The CallPrinter stops at the function call and doesn't look at the
arguments as well (in CallPrinter::VisitCall) to see if the error is
from an incorrect spread operation.
With this patch, we pass some state to the CallPrinter in the
CallWithSpread error case and check that in CallPrinter::VisitCall
before returning.
For the given source string:
```
x = undefined;
console.log(1, ...x);
```
Previously, the error was -
```
test.js:2: TypeError: console.log is not iterable (cannot read property Symbol(Symbol.iterator))
console.log(1, ...x);
^
TypeError: console.log is not iterable (cannot read property Symbol(Symbol.iterator))
at test.js:2:9
```
Now, the error is -
```
_test.js:2: TypeError: x is not iterable (cannot read property undefined)
console.log(1, ...x);
^
TypeError: x is not iterable (cannot read property undefined)
at _test.js:2:9
```
Bug: v8:10038
Change-Id: I199de9997f1d949c6f9b7b4f41d51f422b8b5131
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2037431
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66131}
This relands commit 7c32fa05df.
Some test cases need to be updated, since we will bail out to TurboFan
where previously Liftoff was happy to run, when SIMD is not supported.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][liftoff] Check CpuFeatures for SIMD support
>
> If Wasm simd128 is not supported on this particular hardware, we bail
> out to TurboFan.
>
> Bug: v8:9909
> Change-Id: Ie46e154426783ba099b7c0facc906670cda1bdd0
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029427
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66055}
Bug: v8:9909
Bug: v8:10169
Change-Id: I850e1fe6bfbd12fb2eec052aa8367624c09f7a08
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030354
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66090}
When the file begins with a hashbang, the scanner is in a failed state
when SkipHashbang() is called. This is usually not an issue but when
the parser encounters an ILLEGAL token, it will reset the SyntaxError
location because of it.
Bug: v8:10110
Change-Id: I1c7344bf5ad20079cff80130c991f3bff4d7e9a8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1995312
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66038}
Add a case for kWasmS128 in Spill. We encounter this in the
wasm-trace-memory-liftoff test, but that test was skipped on ARM and
ARM64 due to insufficient implementation of Liftoff on those archs. But
with recent changes, they are now capable of running this particular
test, so we enable it.
Drive-by fix for incorrect size used in vld1 for filling S128 values.
Bug: v8:9909
Change-Id: I8addd06ba3c9a40364e432180cd5dbc48debca23
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2007901
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65904}
Add kWasmS128 to the list of supported types, and implement Fill for all
the architectures so that LocalGet works.
Add a new test file to contain tests that run only on Liftoff, and
assert that the code is indeed compiled by Liftoff.
We cannot rely on the nooptimization variant for testing
because by default, if Liftoff compilation fails, it will fall back to
Turbofan, and we accidentally get a test passing.
We skip these tests on mips architecture that don't support SIMD, since
there is no way to implement these, and we don't have a "lowering" phase
for Liftoff.
As we implement more of SIMD in Liftoff, we can add more
tests to this file and ensure correctness. Future patches will introduce
support for globals and params.
Bug: v8:9909
Change-Id: I7fc911f2d588d60c709ddb258b2efc1f22805fab
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1999470
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65768}
This is a cleanup to remove unneeded flags after these changes (in
https://crrev.com/c/1988548):
* --future does not imply --wasm-tier-up any more, and
* --wasm-tier-up does not imply --liftoff any more.
Instead, now
* --wasm-tier-up is enabled by default,
* --wasm-tier-up has no effect if --liftoff is not set, and
* --future implies --liftoff.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1040061
Change-Id: I5d04ee1f1d84ddcd0654df0e0a4c6298f80aee9e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1993280
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65666}
Currently there are two ways wasm locations are represented in the
inspector. This remains unchanged for now. Also, currently there are
multiple ways location is represented within V8, with the line number
sometimes being a function index and sometimes being 0, and the column
number being a byte offset which is sometimes function relative and
sometimes module relative. With this change, the line number is never
used within V8 (it is always 0), and the column number is always a
byte offset from the beginning of the module. This simplifies
translation logic and keeps it in one place, and will simplify future
changes to wasm location representation in the inspector API.
Bug: chromium:1013527
Change-Id: I8813d47c881988f9ab49d7529fb81fe10dbbccff
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1886915
Commit-Queue: Eric Leese <leese@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64774}
