Expressions of the form
a_0 + a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + ... + a_n
seem to be reasonably common for cases such as building templates.
However, parsing these expressions results in a n-deep expression tree:
...
/
+
/ \
+ a_2
/ \
a_0 a_1
Traversing this tree during compilation can cause a stack overflow when n is
large.
Instead, for left-associate operations such as add, we now build up an
n-ary node in the parse tree, of the form
n-ary +
/ | \
/ | ... \
a_0 a_1 a_n
The bytecode compiler can now iterate through the child expressions
rather than recursing.
This patch only supports arithmetic operations -- subsequent patches
will enable the same optimization for logical tests and comma
expressions.
Bug: v8:6964
Bug: chromium:724961
Bug: chromium:731861
Bug: chromium:752081
Bug: chromium:771653
Bug: chromium:777302
Change-Id: Ie97e4ce42506fe62a7bc4ffbdaa90a9f698352cb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/733120
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48920}
Moves the feedback vector slot allocation out of ast-numbering and into
bytecode generation directly. This has a couple of benifits, including reduced
AST size, avoid code duplication and reduced feedback vector sizes in many cases
due to only allocating slots when needed. Also removes AstProperties since
this is no longer needed.
AstNumbering is now only used to allocate suspend ids for generators.
BUG=v8:6921
Change-Id: I103e8593c94ef5b2e56c34ef4f77bd6e7d64796f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/722959
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48757}
Instead of having feedback vector as a subtype of FixedArray with
reserved slots, make it a first-class variable-sized object with a
fixed-size header. This allows us to compress counters to ints in the
header, rather than forcing them to be Smis.
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: Icc5f088ffbc2e2651b845bc71ea42060639e3e48
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/585129
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46935}
Reland of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/544888/.
Instead of counting profiler ticks on the shared function info (which is
shared between native contexts), count them on the feedback vector
(which is not). This allows us to continue pushing optimization
decisions off the SFI, onto the feedback vector.
Note that a side-effect of this is that ICs don't have to walk the stack
to reset profiler ticks, as they can access the feedback vector directly
from their feedback nexus.
Change-Id: I7aa6baed03f726843d1b62629c72b74f05114b48
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/579051
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46868}
This reverts commit a2fcdc7cc8.
Reason for revert: Large regressions in RCS (https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=740126)
Original change's description:
> [runtime] Move profiler ticks from SFI to feedback vector
>
> Instead of counting profiler ticks on the shared function info (which is
> shared between native contexts), count them on the feedback vector
> (which is not). This allows us to continue pushing optimization
> decisions off the SFI, onto the feedback vector.
>
> Note that a side-effect of this is that ICs don't have to walk the stack
> to reset profiler ticks, as they can access the feedback vector directly
> from their feedback nexus.
>
> Change-Id: I232ae9e759fca75cd89d393148a4ff42caa2646f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/544888
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46411}
TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Change-Id: Id587e4172e300c420f93c49744a2a0e66696edf8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574227
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46702}
Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).
BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
position. It's general treatment for most cases.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
- debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
implementation,
- BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
on first generated bytecode,
- it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
..->BuildReturnPrologue();
..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
..->Return();
In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
position when we emit return bytecode right here.
So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
functions, I'll address async functions later.
[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/
Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
Didn't seem to help and caused a couple of regressions.
BUG=v8:6243,chromium:740124
Change-Id: I72887ba245a524211dbf181c77d0cdc6d917d090
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/568480
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46608}
Instead of counting profiler ticks on the shared function info (which is
shared between native contexts), count them on the feedback vector
(which is not). This allows us to continue pushing optimization
decisions off the SFI, onto the feedback vector.
Note that a side-effect of this is that ICs don't have to walk the stack
to reset profiler ticks, as they can access the feedback vector directly
from their feedback nexus.
Change-Id: I232ae9e759fca75cd89d393148a4ff42caa2646f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/544888
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46411}
Special cases addition expressions where one of the sides is known to be a
string to enable chains of string additions to be transformed into a series
of ToPrimitiveToString operations followed by a single string concatenation
at the end of the chain of additions. This should avoid creating temporary
strings for each of the string additions (in essence this is an automated
string builder).
BUG=v8:6243
Change-Id: I44977d6dad00ee906f251c4bd9cab27e160c09d1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/493966
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45453}
