FullCodegen generates 2 statement positions for the loop init block, like so:
for(var i = 0; i....
^ ^
This change removes the first of those, updates unit tests,
and removes text expectations for Ignition.
---
An alternative would be to emulate the existing behaviour in Ignition, but:
- The new behaviour seems more logical,
- Ignition generates no bytecodes for the 'var', meaning there is no code position to attach the break position to.
BUG=v8:4690
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34717}
We used to emit debug break location on block entry. This cannot be
ported to the interpreted as we do not emit bytecode for block entry.
This made no sense to begin with though, but accidentally added
break locations for var declarations.
With this change, the debugger no longer breaks at var declarations
without initialization. This is in accordance with the fact that the
interpreter does not emit bytecode for uninitialized var declarations.
Also fix the bytecode to match full-codegen's behavior wrt return
positions:
- there is a break location before the return statement, with the source
position of the return statement.
- right before the actual return, there is another break location. The
source position points to the end of the function.
R=rmcilroy@chromium.org, vogelheim@chromium.orgTBR=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4690
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1744123003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34388}
This hackily disambiguates multiple calls for the iterator protocols in ForOf / Yield* by adding -2 / -1 to the pos.
BUG=v8:3953
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1491923003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32527}
The enumerable expression in a for-in/of loop is supposed to have a TDZ for any
lexically bound names in that loop (there can be more than one with destructuring).
This patch accomplishes this with an almost-correct desugaring. The only thing missing
is proper debugger support (the let declarations added by the desugaring, while invisible
to code due to shadowing, are visible to the debugger).
BUG=v8:4210
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29396}
Also support patterns in ``for (var p in/of ...)``
This CL extends the rewriting we used to do for ``for (let p in/of...)`` to
``for (var p in/of ...)``. For all for..in/of loop declaring variable,
we rewrite
for (var/let/const pattern in/of e) b
into
for (x' in/of e) { var/let/const pattern = e; b }
This adds a small complication for debugger: for a statement
for (var v in/of e) ...
we used to have
var v;
for (v in/of e) ...
and there was a separate breakpoint on ``var v`` line.
This breakpoint is actually useless since it is immediately followed by
a breakpoint on evaluation of ``e``, so this CL removes that breakpoint
location.
Similiraly, for let, it used to be that
for (let v in/of e) ...
became
for (x' in/of e) { let v; v = x'; ... }
``let v``generetaed a useless breakpoint (with the location at the
loop's head. This CL removes that breakpoint as well.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149043005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28565}
