When --harmony-async-iteration is enabled, it is now possible to
use the for-await-of loop, which uses the Async Iteration protocol
rather than the ordinary ES6 Iteration protocol.
the Async-from-Sync Iterator object is not implemented in this CL,
and so for-await-of loops will abort execution if the iterated object
does not have a Symbol.asyncIterator() method. Async-from-Sync
Iterators are implemented seperately in https://codereview.chromium.org/2645313003/
BUG=v8:5855, v8:4483
R=neis@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637403008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43224}
The mips64 implementation always ended up in the slowpath due to some
loads that were the wrong width, so that is also fixed here.
BUG=v8:5974
Change-Id: Ie448a1fab5b7fca87597c5a1bf75443864e30c28
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/443247
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43222}
- Removes shared InnerArrayCopyWithin JS builtin from src/js/array.js
- Implements %TypedArray%.prototype.copyWithin as a C++ builtin, which
relies on std::memmove rather than accessing individual eleements.
- Fixes the case where copyWithin is invoked on a TypedArray with a
detached buffer.
- Add tests to ensure that +/-Infinity (for all 3 parameters) is handled
correctly by the
algorithm
The C++ version gets through the benchmark more than 25000 times as
quickly as the JS implementation.
BUG=v8:5925, v8:5929, v8:4648
R=cbruni@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43213}
ParserBase::is_any_identifier currently does not recognise
Token::ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD as an identifier. This seems different
from what ParserBase::ParseIdentifierName does, and also prevents
"l\u0065t", unlike "let", from becoming a label.
This CL extends is_any_identifier to also accept ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD.
BUG=v8:5692
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2695973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43204}
BUG=
Change-Id: I4a5db9bc045a63e710d0115523ab23b98e7c7ae6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/442504
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43189}
If the Reflect.construct receives an argument expected to be a constructor,
and the argument is not a constructor, V8 currently declares that
Reflect.construct is not a function. It should instead say that the offending
argument is not a constructor.
This is the case for all ports of builtins
(Builtins::Generate_ReflectConstruct). All of them make an
attempt to at least pass the right argument to the TypeError parametrised
message, calling out the offending Reflect.construct argument. However,
Runtime::kThrowCalledNonCallable extracts the callsite from those arguments,
discarding the precise information.
This CL adds Runtime::kNotConstructor, which reports the arguments passed
to it, and the CL also modifies the ports of builtins to make use of
Runtime::kNotConstructor
BUG=v8:5671
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2688393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43182}
I identified lots of asm.js tests that are actually not valid according
to the spec, hence they execute in default-javascript-mode.
This CL fixes most of them by adding additional type annotations.
The atomic tests are totally non-spec-compliant by expecting a fourth
argument, and infinite-loops-taken expects a function-type parameter,
so I did not fix those.
I also did not fix the regression tests.
R=titzer@chromium.org, bradnelson@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2663243002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43179}
The constructor for TypedArray in js/typedarray.js emitted
kInvalidTypedArrayAlignment if the array offset exceeded the size of the
underlying buffer. This seems like a typo introduced in
https://codereview.chromium.org/2090353003.
The error message to be emitted instead coincides with the already existing
kInvalidDataViewOffset. The message string is independent of whether the
object in question is a DataView or a typed array, so this CL:
(1) renames kInvalidDataViewOffset to just kInvalidOffset, and
(2) uses kInvalidOffset instead of kInvalidTypedArrayAlignment for cases
when the TypedArray is constructed with an offset exceeding the buffer
size.
BUG=v8:5733
TEST=Run d8, execute "new Uint8Array(new ArrayBuffer(1),2)", see the error message mention the invalid offset 2.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2692753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43151}
This CL fixes some nits in TypeError messages, unifying the form of
kDefineDisallowed and kObjectNotExtensible to match what is used by the
majority of the other messages:
* "Cannot" vs. "Can't" -> choose "Cannot"
* "property:%" -> "property %"
* omit the full-stop at the end of the message
BUG=v8:5673
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686233008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43150}
This adds support for deoptimizing into the JSConstructStub after the
receiver instantiation but before the actual constructor invocation.
Such a deoptimization point is needed for cases where instantiation
might be observed (e.g. when new.target is a proxy) and hence might
trigger a deopt.
We use this new deoptimization point for the "after" frame-state the
inliner attaches to {JSCreate} nodes being inserted when constructor
calls are being inlined.
R=jarin@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-5638b
BUG=v8:5638
Change-Id: I7c72c807ee8fb76d12e0e9ccab86d970ab1a0efd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/440125
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43149}
We cannot skip the @@hasInstance lookup in instanceof depending on a
global protector cell, as the lookup of the property is observable
via proxies or accessors. So remove the global protector and properly
implement CSA::InstanceOf via GetPropertyStub, with an appropriate
fast-path for Function.prototype[@@hasInstance] where we call the
builtin code object directly if the function matches, skipping all
the checks from the call sequence, and also avoid the redundant
ToBoolean conversion on the result.
R=yangguo@chromium.orgTBR=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5958
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684033012
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43137}
Reason for revert:
Due to security issue described in review thread.
Original issue's description:
> [typedarrays] move %TypedArray%.prototype.copyWithin to C++
>
> - Removes shared InnerArrayCopyWithin JS builtin from src/js/array.js
> - Implements %TypedArray%.prototype.copyWithin as a C++ builtin, which
> relies on std::memmove rather than accessing individual eleements.
> - Fixes the case where copyWithin is invoked on a TypedArray with a
> detached buffer.
> - Add tests to ensure that +/-Infinity (for all 3 parameters) is handled correctly by the
> algorithm
>
> The C++ version gets through the benchmark more than 25000 times as
> quickly as the JS implementation.
>
> BUG=v8:5925, v8:5929, v8:4648
> R=cbruni@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2671233002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42975}
> Committed: 0f1c626d55TBR=cbruni@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,cwhan.tunz@gmail.com,caitp@igalia.com
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=v8:5925, v8:5929, v8:4648
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2693753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43132}
Do not allow that holey properties are defined in Array sort.
Throw a type error if the array is not extensible and there are holey
properties in the middle of the array.
BUG=v8:4888
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2664173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43126}
Alternative approach to https://codereview.chromium.org/2667983004/, which
does not depend on implicit control flow changes from
https://codereview.chromium.org/2664083002
- Remove handling for `async function` from Parser::RewriteReturn(). This functionality
is moved to BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn(). This ensures that promise resolution
is deferred until all finally blocks are evaluated fully.
- Add a new deferred command (CMD_ASYNC_RETURN), which instructs ControlScope to
generate return code using BuildAsyncReturn rather than BuildReturn.
- Parser has a new `NewReturnStatement()` helper which determines what type of return
statement to generate based on the type of function.
BUG=v8:5896, v8:4483
R=littledan@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, gsathya@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685683002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43104}
This fixes the case where the index passed to {HMaybeGrowElements} used
to derive the new capacity for the elements backing store does not fit
into Smi range. Such an overflow would fail the capacity check and cause
growing to be skipped. Subsequent keyed stores would potentially go out
of bounds.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-686427
BUG=chromium:686427
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43101}
Collecting precise invocation counts need to be explicitly
enabled. Once enabled, we disable optimization (optimized
code does not increment invocation count, and may inline
callees), and make sure feedback vectors interesting for
code coverage is not garbage-collected.
R=hpayer@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43082}
This CL includes runtime and IC parts of the tracking. It is controlled by
compile-time flag FLAG_constant_field_tracking and currently disabled.
Transition from kConst to kMutable still involves map deprecation.
BUG=v8:5495
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2598543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43081}
Collect code coverage from the available invocation counts.
The granularity is at function level, and invocation counts may
be lost to GC.
Coverage::Collect returns a std::vector of Coverage::ScriptData.
Each ScriptData contains a script ID and a std::vector of
Coverage::RangeEntry.
Each RangeEntry consists of a end position and the invocation
count. The start position is implicit from the end position of
the previous RangeEntry, or 0 if it's the first RangeEntry.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2689493002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43072}
E.g.,
{ function lazy_inner(b = somevar) { let somevar; } }
If we don't produce the same scopes, PreParser thinks that the unresolved
variable inside the default parameter resolves into the variable declared inside
the function. Thus, it's not correctly recorded as a free variable.
One part is already done by https://codereview.chromium.org/2638333002 . But at
the laziness boundary, we still produced different scopes.
Unlike previously thought, this is also needed for lazy inner function
correctness, not only for "preparser scope analysis" (ie., skipping inner
functions).
BUG=v8:5938
Change-Id: I047cd43ef16478bb0f18d1f114845e7d1ab8c5f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439345
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43044}
Where the arguments have already been inlined, we can replace these
calls with a direct call. We have to make sure that the iteration over
the arguments is not observable.
Also factor out the large chunk of logic shared with
ReduceJSConstructWithSpread.
BUG=v8:5932
Change-Id: I6c4fac670028fbd8ca82c4474d4392231573bc49
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439329
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43039}
It used to require >1GB of memory which leads to flaky test failures on
machines with less memory when executing multiple variants in parallel
R=cbruni@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5706
Change-Id: Id8c6f49cbfa51f2d443991c1493f225810efb18f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439310
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43038}
The testb instruction requires the REX prefix when either of its
operands uses a register with the high bit set. The existing code only
considered the register operand. In the test case the REX prefix was not
emitted because the testb instruction had the register operand RAX which
does not have the high bit set. The REX prefix was necessary though
because the memory operand used R8, which has the high bit set.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:688876
Change-Id: Ib214bebbe75965664f2aea530e29afa95a54f44f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439145
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43030}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
> >
> > Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> > if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> > occurs inside a loop. For example:
> >
> > let i = 10;
> > do { var x = i } while (i--):
> >
> > As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> > as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> > syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> > occurs in a block scope.)
> >
> > BUG=v8:5636
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> > Committed: a33fcd663b
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
> Committed: f3ae5ccf57TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43013}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Thread maybe-assigned through the bytecodes. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2655733003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> needed for properly reverting f3ae5ccf57
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Thread maybe-assigned through the bytecodes.
> >
> > This introduces LoadImmutableContextSlot and LoadImmutableCurrentContextSlot
> > bytecodes, which are emitted when reading from never-assigned context slot.
> >
> > There is a subtlety here: the slot are not immutable, the meaning is
> > actually undefined-or-hole-or-immutable.
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655733003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43000}
> > Committed: 17c2dd3886
>
> TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2680923003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43011}
> Committed: ece4e54a31TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679953003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43012}
Reason for revert:
needed for properly reverting f3ae5ccf57
Original issue's description:
> Thread maybe-assigned through the bytecodes.
>
> This introduces LoadImmutableContextSlot and LoadImmutableCurrentContextSlot
> bytecodes, which are emitted when reading from never-assigned context slot.
>
> There is a subtlety here: the slot are not immutable, the meaning is
> actually undefined-or-hole-or-immutable.
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655733003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43000}
> Committed: 17c2dd3886TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2680923003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43011}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
Original issue's description:
> [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
>
> Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> occurs inside a loop. For example:
>
> let i = 10;
> do { var x = i } while (i--):
>
> As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> occurs in a block scope.)
>
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> Committed: a33fcd663bTBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
This introduces LoadImmutableContextSlot and LoadImmutableCurrentContextSlot
bytecodes, which are emitted when reading from never-assigned context slot.
There is a subtlety here: the slot are not immutable, the meaning is
actually undefined-or-hole-or-immutable.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655733003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43000}
... and TypeFeedbackMetadata to FeedbackMetadata.
BUG=
Change-Id: I2556d1c2a8f37b8cf3d532cc98d973b6dc7e9e6c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439244
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42999}
Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
occurs inside a loop. For example:
let i = 10;
do { var x = i } while (i--):
As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
occurs in a block scope.)
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
For x64, ia32 and x87 we would pop the return address before the stack
overflow check. This meant the stack couldn't be unwound properly if
it was going to overflow. This CL moves the pop of the return address
to after the stack overflow check.
Also adds a regression test to check that a RangeError is thrown.
BUG=689016
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2681643004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42984}
This correctly marks the {JSCreate} operator as potentially throwing,
since it might trigger a property access of the 'prototype' property
during instantiation. This is observable, can throw (not kNoThrow),
might have side-effects (not kNoWrite), or even trigger a lazy deopt
event (not kNoDeopt). The inlining logic has been adapted to wire up
control projections accordingly.
Note that this does not yet take care of the "after" frame-state which
is associated with the {JSCreate} node introduced by the inliner. We
still might re-evaluate the property access upon lazy deoptimization.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-5638
BUG=v8:5638
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2671203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42981}
- Removes shared InnerArrayCopyWithin JS builtin from src/js/array.js
- Implements %TypedArray%.prototype.copyWithin as a C++ builtin, which
relies on std::memmove rather than accessing individual eleements.
- Fixes the case where copyWithin is invoked on a TypedArray with a
detached buffer.
- Add tests to ensure that +/-Infinity (for all 3 parameters) is handled correctly by the
algorithm
The C++ version gets through the benchmark more than 25000 times as
quickly as the JS implementation.
BUG=v8:5925, v8:5929, v8:4648
R=cbruni@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2671233002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42975}
TypeFeedbackVectors are strongly rooted by a closure. However, in modern
JavaScript closures are created and abandoned more freely. An important
closure may not be present in the root-set at time of garbage collection,
even though we've cached optimized code and use it regularly. For
example, consider leaf functions in an event dispatching system. They may
well be "hot," but tragically non-present when we collect the heap.
Until now, we've relied on a weak root to cache the feedback vector in
this case. Since there is no way to signal intent or relative importance,
this weak root is as susceptible to clearing as any other weak root at
garbage collection time.
Meanwhile, the feedback vector has become more important. All of our
ICs store their data there. Literal and regex boilerplates are stored there.
If we lose the vector, then we not only lose optimized code built from
it, we also lose the very feedback which allowed us to create that optimized
code. Therefore it's vital to express that dependency through the root
set.
This CL does this by creating a strong link to a feedback
vector at the instantiation site of the function closure.
This instantiation site is in the code and feedback vector
of the outer closure.
BUG=v8:5456
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2674593003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42953}
TailCallRuntime currently does not seem to handle adaptor frames
correctly.
BUG=chromium:688690
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2675133003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42950}
Also if the count is not specified, it should wake all waiters.
BUG=v8:4777
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2659083004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42871}
Using .caller, one can get access to the internal function that invokes the
handler passed to Promise.prototype.then. This internal function is a TF
builtin that was set up as non-native and without an argument adaptor. As a
consequence of this, when accessing .arguments on it, the frame-walking logic in
the .arguments accessor thinks the number of arguments is -1 and we try to
allocate an array of size -1.
This CL marks the builtin function as native (making its .arguments be null),
along with a few others that may have been incorrect in the same way.
BUG=chromium:682349
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2672453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42855}
The function being tested is forced to go through Turbofan anyway (since it references a module variable).
Adding --turbo explicitly just to make a check happy.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2664393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42844}
Also updated some tests due to the change. The general pattern is when a
trailing comma is expected to cause a SyntaxError, an additional comma was
added.
BUG=v8:5051
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2638513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42826}
The KeyedStoreMode that we get out of the FeedbackNexus doesn't
necessarily need to apply when we have "static knowledge" about
the receiver, i.e. when the receiver is a known JSTypedArray, but
the KEYED_STORE_IC has seen only JSArray instances so far. The
DCHECK was too restrictive in this case, since we can just ignore
the KEYED_STORE_IC mode (like we ignore the maps).
BUG=chromium:685050
R=ishell@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2668643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42810}
We were missing a case for Tagged->TaggedSigned conversions when the
input type is known to be Type::SignedSmall.
BUG=chromium:687029
R=jarin@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2666863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42809}
We cannot eliminate unused CheckFloat64Hole nodes, since loading from a
holey array can have side-effects, i.e. triggering getters in the
prototype chain.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:686737
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2665123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42806}
When WebAssembly.Table initial size is greater than the declared initial size, table size references should be updated on instantiate for functions to be called at indices greater than the declared initial size.
R=bradnelson@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661773002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42781}
Where the arguments have already been inlined, we can replace these calls with a
direct call to construct. We have to make sure that the iteration over the arguments is not observable.
BUG=v8:5895
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2659623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42765}
This avoids using kTaggedSigned and kTaggedPointer because the
semantic information of those type could be invalid in unreachable
code.
For example, SmiCheck(0.1) has representation TaggedSigned, but it is
later compiled to DeoptimizeUnless(ObjectIsSmi(0.1)) with the constant
0.1 directly connected to the uses. If the use is state-values, which
recorded the TaggedSigned representation of CheckSmi, the code
generator will be confused because it will see constant 0.1 that
claims to be TaggedSigned value.
BUG=chromium:675704
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2656243004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42756}
Some tests require a lot of memory and they fail on buildbots if they run
in parallel with other tests of the same kind.
We try to limit this by disabling multiple vairants of the same tests,
assuming this would stop the failures in most of the cases.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2653603002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42741}
The StringIndexOf operation is pure on the JS level, but the actual stub
call must be in the effect chain later so that the Scheduler doesn't
place it inside some allocation region (The %StringIndexOf runtime
function may trigger a GC for string flattening).
BUG=chromium:685580
R=jarin@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2657243002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42736}
Basically, with --deopt-every-n-times flag all bets are off since
the functions can be optimized and deoptimized at any time.
BUG=v8:5890
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655263004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42735}
The mentioned asserts did not work properly with interpreted and turbofanned functions.
To fix this issue %GetOptimizationStatus() now returns a set of flags instead of a single value.
This CL also adds more helper functions to mjsunit, like isNeverOptimize(), isAlwaysOptimize(),
isOptimized(fun), etc.
BUG=v8:5890
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2654733004
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42703}
Committed: d1ddec7857
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2654733004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42731}
Previously, when restarting a frame, we would rewrite all frames
between the debugger activation and the frame to restart to squash
them, and replace the return address with that of a builtin to
leave that rewritten frame, and restart the function by calling it.
We now simply remember the frame to drop to, and upon returning
from the debugger, we check whether to drop the frame, load the
new FP, and restart the function.
R=jgruber@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5587
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2636913002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42725}
Memory.Grow should detach the ArrayBuffer associated with the Mem object after Grow. Currently, when guard pages are enabled protection is changed to make more of the buffer accessible. This does not work for when the buffer should be detached after grow, because the memory object has a reference to the same buffer befor/after grow.
R=titzer@chromium.org, eholk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2653183003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42717}
This corrects the case when we need to allocate a
blocked register, but the blockage happens after a
use as an instruction input, and there's no place to
split before that.
BUG=v8:5888
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2652153005
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42706}
Committed: ca779b29a6
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2652153005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42710}
This CL adds --crankshaft and --no-always-opt flags to the tests that use
assertOptimized() and assertUnoptimized() respectively.
This CL also adds presubmit checks that ensure that tests have the proper
flags set.
BUG=v8:5890
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2653753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42709}
Reason for revert:
Introduces new crashers, e.g.
load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-constants.js");
load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-module-builder.js");
(function() {
var builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
builder.addMemory(16, 32, false);
builder.addFunction("test", kSig_i_iii)
.addBodyWithEnd([
// body:
kExprI64Const, 0x42,
kExprI64Const, 0x7a,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Mul,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Const, 0x41,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Shl,
kExprI64Const, 0x41,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Ctz,
kExprI64Shl,
kExprF32SConvertI64,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd, // @20
])
.exportFunc();
var module = builder.instantiate();
module.exports.test(1, 2, 3);
})();
Original issue's description:
> [turbofan] Correct regalloc blocked register behavior
>
>
> This corrects the case when we need to allocate a
> blocked register, but the blockage happens after a
> use as an instruction input, and there's no place to
> split before that.
>
> BUG=v8:5888
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2652153005
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42706}
> Committed: ca779b29a6TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5888
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2654993007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42707}
This corrects the case when we need to allocate a
blocked register, but the blockage happens after a
use as an instruction input, and there's no place to
split before that.
BUG=v8:5888
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2652153005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42706}
The mentioned asserts did not work properly with interpreted and turbofanned functions.
To fix this issue %GetOptimizationStatus() now returns a set of flags instead of a single value.
This CL also adds more helper functions to mjsunit, like isNeverOptimize(), isAlwaysOptimize(),
isOptimized(fun), etc.
BUG=v8:5890
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2654733004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42703}
This makes sure that static guarantees about object maps are not used
accross operations on the effect chain that might trigger a map change.
Such operations are missing the {Operator::kNoWrite} property.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-685506
BUG=chromium:685506
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2653273004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42697}
According to the WebAssembly spec no arithmetic operation should ever
return a signalling NaN. With the constant folding in V8, however, it
was possible that some arithmetic operations were elided, and if the
input of the arithmetic operation was a signalling NaN, then also the
result was the same signalling NaN. This CL removes some constant
folding optimizations and adjusts others so that even with constant
folding the result of an arithmetic operation is never a signalling NaN.
R=titzer@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org, bmeurer@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2647353007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42694}
This makes sure that the deoptimizer preserves the exact bit pattern of
floating-point values (both 32-bit and 64-bit) up to the point where a
potential {HeapNumber} is allocated. It in turn allows us to correctly
recognize the {hole_nan_value} when stored into a {FixedDouleArray}.
R=jarin@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-684208
BUG=chromium:684208
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2652303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42679}
In practice, Emscripten seems to emit cond?+a:+b type return
expressions. This is not allowed by the spec or errata, but we need
to support it for compatibility.
Similar patterns with ints / signed, do not seem to be supported.
BUG=v8:5891
R=mtrofin@chromium.org,aseemgarg@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2648353010
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42677}
Enable enqueueing of eager inner function compilation onto the compiler
dispatcher. This enables these tasks to be performed in parallel to
compilation of the outer functio (only for Ignition functions).
We currently synchronize to ensure all inner function compilations
are complete before executing the outer function - future work will
allow outer function execution to happenin parallel to inner function
compilation.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2611313002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42667}
We did not smi-check the spread argument here, meaning we tried to take the map
of a smi, resulting in segfaults which clusterfuzz found.
Also added tests that exercise this path.
BUG=685086
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42657}
This fixes the checks of accumulator usage flags in the computation of
the interpreter register liveness during bytecode analysis. The usage
flags at hand are bit patterns as opposed to flat enum values. Use the
safe accessors instead of plain comparison.
R=jarin@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-683581
BUG=chromium:683581
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2651653005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42648}
Array.prototype.concat does not properly handle JSProxy species that will
modify the currently visited array.
BUG=682194
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655623004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42640}
A recent change to disallow wasm compilation in contexts where
CSP unsafe-eval would disallow eval also ended up banning asm.js there:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2646713002
This ends up banning non-evaled asm.js even in some places it should be
allowed.
NOTE: Although asm.js code converted to wasm generates an intermediate wasm
module. asm.js code evaled in a disallowed context can't even get
that far (as it's stoped at the eval site).
BUG=683867
R=mtrofin@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2656463004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42616}
Atomics.wait is a function which may block, which is not allowed on the
main thread. Since V8 doesn't know whether a particular isolate is the
"main thread", this CL adds an option to Isolate::CreateParams to choose
whether this function is allowed.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2642293002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42611}
Convert strings to numbers if possible in the runtime call and store
in excluded property list.
BUG=v8:5549
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2639333004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42581}
This moves AsyncFunctionAwait{Caught,Uncaught} to CSA, and removes
async-await.js.
BUG=v8:5639
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2643023002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42579}
Reason for revert:
Breaks arm64.
Original issue's description:
> [regexp] Store named captures on the regexp result
>
> This implements storing named captures on the regexp result object.
> For instance, /(?<a>.)/u.exec("b") will return a result such that:
>
> result.group.a // "b"
>
> The spec proposal is not yet final, so this may still change in the future.
>
> BUG=v8:5437
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42532}
> Committed: 70000946eb
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42570}
> Committed: ee94fa11edTBR=yangguo@chromium.org,littledan@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5437
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2639403008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42577}
This implements storing named captures on the regexp result object.
For instance, /(?<a>.)/u.exec("b") will return a result such that:
result.group.a // "b"
The spec proposal is not yet final, so this may still change in the future.
BUG=v8:5437
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42532}
Committed: 70000946eb
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42570}
Reason for revert:
Breaks no18n build: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20noi18n%20-%20debug/builds/11604
Original issue's description:
> [regexp] Store named captures on the regexp result
>
> This implements storing named captures on the regexp result object.
> For instance, /(?<a>.)/u.exec("b") will return a result such that:
>
> result.group.a // "b"
>
> The spec proposal is not yet final, so this may still change in the future.
>
> BUG=v8:5437
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42532}
> Committed: 70000946ebTBR=yangguo@chromium.org,littledan@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5437
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2643213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42534}
This implements storing named captures on the regexp result object.
For instance, /(?<a>.)/u.exec("b") will return a result such that:
result.group.a // "b"
The spec proposal is not yet final, so this may still change in the future.
BUG=v8:5437
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630233003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42532}
This makes sure 32-bit constants that are used as {MachineType::Uint32}
by the deoptimization translation are also interpreted as such when the
literals are collected.
R=jarin@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-681983
BUG=chromium:681983
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2646463002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42493}
The IA32AddPair and IA32SubPair instructions were using an input register as a
temporary value, which led to registers sometimes being clobbered when they
shouldn't have been. This led to problems, for example, in calling printf to
format doubles:
printf("%f", 1.2345) => 0.61725 (on x86)
BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5800
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637583002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42486}
