Reason for revert:
All build problems had other reasons.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168303007/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> [Sheriff] Revert until the tree is in a better state.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs.
> >
> > This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
> > tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
> > will be changed in a follow up.
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/f41a81b8a513fc360c500c066b74f223bc9c0223
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
>
> TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/f83444a5f24381ec9ccc28b1e18e1e9370415bb2
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28891}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1179483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28903}
Reason for revert:
All build problems had other causes.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1171943002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> might break stuff
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators.
> >
> > This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
> > overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
> > different indicators are independent.
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/fbe973ff1722a6158a5b2babce9c1a32d26a1d3b
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
>
> TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2a3962d9d2a7415378811f4d56522531332d5a3e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28869}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28901}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Revert until the tree is in a better state.
Original issue's description:
> [test] Refactoring - Let runner handle test IDs.
>
> This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
> tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
> will be changed in a follow up.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/f41a81b8a513fc360c500c066b74f223bc9c0223
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1167343003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28891}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Still lots of breakages on some builders. E.g. http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap/builds/3313
Original issue's description:
> Update Test262 to 5/30
>
> This updates the test runner to run all tests in both sloppy
> and strict mode.
>
> It also marks the test in the status file as failing in
> sloppy mode even if all it does is marking the test as
> [PASS, FAIL]. A future CL will have to validate that the
> tests pass and fail in the correct mode.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/d869f4a4801d4ef6868c266c07f9e29d2e29cba5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28879}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,arv@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1173933002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28890}
This updates the test runner to run all tests in both sloppy
and strict mode.
It also marks the test in the status file as failing in
sloppy mode even if all it does is marking the test as
[PASS, FAIL]. A future CL will have to validate that the
tests pass and fail in the correct mode.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28879}
Pushed the detection logic down to ParseAndClassifyIdentifier in
preparation to having patterns in parameter positions.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org,wingo@igalia.com
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1170153003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28876}
Reason for revert:
might break stuff
Original issue's description:
> [test] Refactoring - Use subject/observer pattern for progress indicators.
>
> This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
> overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
> different indicators are independent.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fbe973ff1722a6158a5b2babce9c1a32d26a1d3b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,tandrii@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1163373005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28869}
This should prevent bugs caused by missing super calls in
overridden methods. The assumption is that methods of
different indicators are independent.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1171943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28866}
This prepares for properly rerunning tests. Currently when
tests are rerun, the same test object is reused. This
will be changed in a follow up.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1168303007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28864}
Constants are taken from chromium/src/google_breakpad/common/minidump_cpu_arm64.h
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149293005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28785}
In a nutshell: The FILTER_KEY builtin is gone, and was replaced by a
simple runtime call to ForInFilter, which does everything and is even
cheaper (because FILTER_KEY used to call into the runtime anyway).
And ForInFilter returns either the name or undefined, which makes it
possible to remove the control flow construction from the AstGraphBuilder,
and thereby make both the initialization and the per-loop code of for-in
optimizable later (in typed lowering).
R=jarin@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1160983004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28711}
The SimplifiedOperatorReducer is (mostly) unused, except for the very
rough store elimination, and just eats compilation time.
R=jarin@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1162563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28673}
Without this change, wildcards always overwrite the outcomes
of more specific rules. Now we always merge.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28629}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
This will send automatic email notifications about reliable
failures from the respective jobs.
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1147713002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28448}
