This is a reland of a0728e869b
Original change's description:
> [d8] Remove maximum workers limitation
>
> This CL refactors the lifetime management of the v8::Worker C++ object
> and in the process lifts the 100 maximum worker limitation. To do this,
> it uses a Managed<v8::Worker> heap object and attaches the managed to
> the API worker object.
>
> R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:9524
>
> Change-Id: I279b7aeb6645a87f9108ee6f572105739721cef4
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1715453
> Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62932}
Bug: v8:9524
Change-Id: I7d903fb12ddb00909a9429455f46c55db2fd02de
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1722562
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62974}
Just the low-hanging fruit. There is more to do.
Bug: v8:2487
Change-Id: Ia9afa32797960f6c4c7c4fa0f39c70efc63663e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1669698
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62397}
Bug: v8:9247
Change-Id: I9bcf2694b449f79cdbe03f5fde59cb21b8cad418
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1619758
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61676}
This way we can remove them correctly and avoid leaks.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org, ulan@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8725
Change-Id: I52cbbf34a94171aaeb581b55aecb25311465544d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1446453
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59266}
By adding a per test source file namespace, we can avoid a lot of
symbol collisions in jumbo builds.
While we're at it, let's remove some "using" statements that also
cause trouble.
Bug: chromium:746958
Change-Id: I6f8a723e1ba5905888638e0687b23193f3f012ca
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/676803
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mostyn Bramley-Moore <mostynb@opera.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48102}
When using Lockers and Unlockers it is possible to create a
scenario where multiple threads point to the same optimized
code object. When that happens, if one of the threads triggers
deoptimization, then the stack replacement needs to happen in
the stacks of all threads.
With this CL, the deoptimizer visits all threads to do so.
The CL also adds three tests where V8 used to crash due to this
issue.
Bug: v8:6563
Change-Id: I74e9af472d4833aa8d13e579df45133791f6a503
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/670783
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Juliana Patricia Vicente Franco <jupvfranco@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48060}
This reverts commit c87f8954cc.
Reason for revert: LazyDeoptimizationMultithread failing.
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/builds/1876/steps/Bisect%20c87f8954.Retry/logs/LazyDeoptimizationMul..
Original change's description:
> Deoptimization and multithreading.
>
> When using Lockers and Unlockers it is possible to create a
> scenario where multiple threads point to the same optimized
> code object. When that happens, if one of the threads triggers
> deoptimization, then the stack replacement needs to happen in
> the stacks of all threads.
> With this CL, the deoptimizer visits all threads to do so.
> The CL also adds three tests where V8 used to crash.
>
> Bug: v8:6563
> Change-Id: Iea88f47af2f31181c0ef06d898faccde9ad14432
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/657423
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Juliana Patricia Vicente Franco <jupvfranco@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48033}
TBR=mstarzinger@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,jupvfranco@google.com
Change-Id: I290c9e339c367f68c0d1b6f7c0780cdbbbdf3f8a
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:6563
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/669399
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48049}
When using Lockers and Unlockers it is possible to create a
scenario where multiple threads point to the same optimized
code object. When that happens, if one of the threads triggers
deoptimization, then the stack replacement needs to happen in
the stacks of all threads.
With this CL, the deoptimizer visits all threads to do so.
The CL also adds three tests where V8 used to crash.
Bug: v8:6563
Change-Id: Iea88f47af2f31181c0ef06d898faccde9ad14432
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/657423
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Juliana Patricia Vicente Franco <jupvfranco@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48033}
As part of J2V8 development (https://github.com/eclipsesource/J2V8),
we realized that we had a subtle bug in how Isolate scope was created
and it's lifetime managed, see:
https://github.com/eclipsesource/J2V8/issues/313.
Mentioned above bug was fixed, however, what we also noticed is that
V8 API has been constantly and slowly moving to such an API, in which
one has to pass Isolate explicitly to methods and/or constructors. We
found two more places that might have been overlooked. This contribution
adds passing of Isolate pointer explicitly to constructors of
String::Utf8Value and String::Value classes.
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: I61984285f152aba5ca922100cf3df913a9cb2cea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/593309
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47656}
Downside: this adds all kinds of weird includes in the .cc files.
(See design doc linked in the bug.)
BUG=v8:5402
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2622503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42140}
Aside from the default snapshot, there is no need for additional context
snapshots to have the ability to replace the global proxy and global object
after deserialization. Changes include:
- Changes to the API to better distinguish default context snapshot from
additional context snapshots.
- Disallow global handles when creating snapshots.
- Allow extensions when creating snapshots.
This solves the issue of not being able to having accessors and interceptors on
the global object of contexts to be serialized.
R=jochen@chromium.org, peria@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:617892
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2557743003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41588}
This makes for slightly faster rebuilds when touching parser-base.h
(which changes frequently!). Also takes care of an old TODO,
moving CompileTimeValue into its own file under ast/, where it
properly belongs.
BUG=v8:5294
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2305883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39141}
If many threads use the same Isolate (or many Isolates) and then
terminate, their PerIsolateThreadData objects are never cleaned
up, resulting in a slow memory leak and, worse, the
PerIsolateThreadData chain getting larger and larger, adversely
affecting performance.
In this situation, embedders will now be encouraged to apply
DiscardThreadSpecificMetadata against any Isolate a thread is
done with, especially if the thread is about to terminate.
Note that it is harmless to run DiscardThreadSpecificMetadata
against an Isolate for which a thread has no thread data and
per-Isolate thread data can be reestablished if a thread starts
using an Isolate again after running DiscardThreadSpecificMetadata
against it.
It is, however, an embedder error to run
DiscardThreadSpecificMetadata against an Isolate in thread with a
Locker for the Isolate in the stack or against an Entered Isolate.
This change cannot cause any change in behavior in existing apps
as the only added coded can only be reached via the new
DiscardThreadSpecificMetadata method.
R=Jakob, jochen
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1522703002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32909}
Moves all files related to AST and scopes into ast/,
and all files related to scanner & parser to parsing/.
Also eliminates a couple of spurious dependencies.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1481613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32351}
We shouldn't have shared state between isolates by default. The embedder
is free to pass the same allocator to all isolates it creates.
BUG=none
R=dcarney@chromium.org
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1116633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28127}
