To be consistent with the all the other tiers and avoid confusion, we
rename --opt to ---turbofan, and --always-opt to --always-turbofan.
Change-Id: Ie23dc8282b3fb4cf2fbf73b6c3d5264de5d09718
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3610431
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80336}
With bytecode flushing and lazy feedback allocation, we need to call
%PrepareForOptimization before we call %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall,
ideally after declaring the function.
Bug: v8:8801, v8:8394, v8:9183
Change-Id: I3fb257282a30f6526a376a3afdedb44786320d34
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1648255
Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62119}
With the new builtin optimization guard we can just speculatively assume
that the index passed to String#charAt and String#charCodeAt (in
optimized
code) is going to be within the valid range for the receiver. This is
what Crankshaft used to do, and it avoids Smi checks on the result for
String#charCodeAt, since it can no longer return NaN.
This gives rise to further optimizations of these builtins (i.e. to
completely avoid the tagging of char codes), and by itself already
improves the regression test originally reported from 650ms to
610ms.
Bug: v8:7127, v8:7326
Change-Id: I6c160540a1e002a37e44fa7f920e5e8f8c2c4210
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/873382
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50888}
