The emitted safepoint entries had the wrong size, because it did not
contain StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. The code still
worked because the indices of encoded in the entries where too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp and thereby corrected
the invalid size. It worked as follows:
First the stack_slots_size gets calculated from the safepoint entry.
Then the position of a stack slot was
"frame_header_base + stack_slots_size - index * pointer_size", where
"index" is what is encoded in the safepoint map. Because of the incorrect
encoding, both stack_slot_size and index were too low by
StandardFrameConstants::kFixedFrameSizeAboveFp. Therefore the errors in
both values eliminated each other, making the end result correct.
With --print-code, the safepoint entry size was also read, and it
crashed because the encoded value was too low.
The reland fixes the indices.
Original message:
With this CL we emit safepoint maps for externref values on the Liftoff
value stack. With that there is support for externref parameters and
locals in Liftoff, as well as for intermediate values of type
externref.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I88444e57745d7b9fe8f1630e904d49736fa9d720
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398531
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69786}
An earlier cl:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2354810 fixed loading
double fields with dynamic map checks. The fix however didn't update the
expected type information to also expect Smi fields. So, in the later
optimization phases the CheckHeapObject operation was reduced to a NoP
since the expected type was a HeapObject. This cl fixes the bug by
updating the type to Type::Any.
Bug: chromium:1124696, v8:10582
Change-Id: Ic96dd74c97caf8eaf5289d8e8939f6feb1686a57
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2396088
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69730}
Due to the way SSE flags work, we need to enable all versions prior to
SSE 4.1 as well.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I50ddd3f486641e7bf22c651fc2c9a8a4ccbc2b46
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391325
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69687}
The test is incompatible with --noenable-sse4-1, which is randomly
added by numfuzz (and possibly other fuzzers).
The "Flags" from the test files are always passed last and are often
used to neuter incompatible flags.
Bug: v8:10863
Change-Id: I8fd11b4d38586f25f5af63ab8ef83873dc250557
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2389982
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69665}
For TypedArray, a fast path is used when using the builtin iterator, and
next method has not been overriden. If we use that fast path for JSArray
too, the method will be about 200x times faster on a large array.
This patch also fixes a bug when a typed array is modified during the
mapper execution. In that case, the modification should not be taken
into account.
Bug: v8:10802
Change-Id: I74e2cbcd6a654def318585b4e08745037584669a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2358749
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Renevier <arenevier@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69655}
With a recent change, we require WebAssembly code to be tiered up to
serialize it, see https://crrev.com/c/2349290. In that CL tests were
adjusted to set the --wasm-tier-up flag when serialization was involved.
However, the test adjusted in this CL was missing, because this test
used the kExprRefNull instruction, which caused a bailout to TurboFan
anyways. With recent changes, Liftoff can compile kExprRefNull now,
and therefore causes problems.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10852
Change-Id: I9b89f37c22f17cbf046110f3ee1c98bfea73e009
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387574
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69648}
The graph assembler calls MergeControlToEnd as part of Unreachable
node creation; this causes issues when used inside the GraphReducer
framework, since the reducer is not notified by gasm that the end node
should be revisited.
The (hacky) fix in this CL is to always mark the end node for
revisitation after a gasm reduction has taken place.
Bug: v8:8888,chromium:1123379
Change-Id: I350bb7144add04a0c3fd7f3d88c07fcfe1cd42e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2384772
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69619}
A recent unrelated change caused these tests to get unlucky in
GC stress mode. Their "assertOptimized" expectations rely on
certain type feedback data not getting flushed at the wrong time.
Bug: v8:10846
Change-Id: I86d0b0c049539e4a69aa764cc6ec92465ca12beb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381458
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69617}
For SIMD instructions that use aligned moves (like movaps or movapd), we
don't have correct memory alignment for SIMD moves yet. Switch to to
movupd.
Bug: v8:9198
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Ic60fba5d08dda9676f6091ce505ac7be54957d00
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2380240
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69613}
With in-place representation changes we can transition from a double
field to a Tagged field without changing the map. So it is not always
safe to assume the loaded value would be a HeapNumber. TurboFan takes a
dependency on the field representation to ensure the code is deoptimized
on any changes. With dynamic map checks, it is not possible to take such
a dependency. Hence check the loaded value is a HeapNumber and
deoptimize otherwise.
Bug: chromium:1112155,v8:10582
Change-Id: I910ac1c0781ac8842fdbf272f9173b55b02923ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2354810
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69521}
Load extends always load 8 bytes, so the access size does not depend on
MachineType of the load. The MachineType is used for classifying the
lane shape of the 8-byte load.
Also add cctest to load splats and load extends to test OOB. (Note that
load splats access size depends on MachineType).
Add regression test from clusterfuzz, minimized by ahaas@. Remove the
`--no-wasm-trap-handler` flag since we have a no_wasm_traps variant that
should test this flag.
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I27ba051d0536ca0f6fd75dd641ca9b78132dafed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2363291
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69489}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This is a reland of 57242a051e
no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
This is a reland of 60ee70bb40.
The wasm c-api flakes were fixed in https://crrev.com/c/2349293.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I2a7c1429812ca46d88a2902b8e0a7b7e3d638b56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349290
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69335}
This reverts commit 57242a051e.
Reason for revert: regression tests fails:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31477
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5d9d1dcb81771f71001d959ec5a03a43a11c4233
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1112124
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2347211
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69316}
vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Up until now. we only checked the size of tables defined in a module
at instantiation time. For imported tables we only checked if the
imported table matched the declared import in size. This causes a
problem because we allocate function tables also for imported tabled
before we actually look at the imported table.
With this CL we first check the size of all tables, and only then start
to initialize and load them.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114006
Change-Id: Iaf194ed21fb83304fe3a7f0f7ba7b282396e3954
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339473
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69291}
The cast from uint32_t to int caused an integer overflow that let a
bounds check succeed that should have failed.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114005
Change-Id: Iea1af70af300be54c2a33d7dd10b3faa34d56eaa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339472
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69289}
This reverts commit 60ee70bb40.
Reason for revert: wasm-api-tests/WasmCapiTest.Serialize starts flaking: https://crbug.com/v8/10784
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic1349375bd562bb0a2724c39c27ef3247461c97b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342845
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69284}
We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
(debugging, dynamic tiering).
This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
enabling the debugger.
Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
We used to check the size of tables at compile time, and threw a
CompilationError if a given size exceeded the implementation-defined
limit. However, the spec defines that an error should only be thrown
when the implementation-defined limit is reached, which is either at
instantiation time of during runtime at a table.grow.
With this CL the V8 implementation becomes spec compliant in this
regard.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I7d0e688b385a65e4060a569e5ab1dec68947ceea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2326331
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69267}
This test uses a i64x2.shr_s to shift a v128 with all bits set by 1,
resulting in v128 with all bits set (no change). This value is then
dropped, and param[2] (3), is returned.
Without the fix, -1 is returned, since i64x2.shr_s overwrites the
register for param[2] with 0xffffffff.
Bug: v8:10752
Bug: chromium:1111522
Change-Id: I0310bf6039be780a6738689069cdbcfa3a24bbdb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2335779
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69233}
If we are near the stack limit, calling the proxy method might not work
any more. Instead of crashing because of an empty MaybeLocal, handle
this gracefully.
Drive-by: Minor refactoring in TryGetValue.
R=tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1110001
Change-Id: I07e7773768166b3dbea2e6b75a3ab8b24bfeee53
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332156
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69161}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
The {operator==} on {VarState} did not check the spill offset, so when
merging stack states, we forgot to move stack values if both source and
destination were stack slots, but at different offsets.
This CL fixes this by removing the {operator==}, because the semantics
(and use) are not clear, and it's only used in one place anyway.
The equality check was mostly redundant, so inlining it also makes the
code smaller and faster.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10702
Change-Id: I6c8b2cfd1002274175c9a17d305692e4631fd7dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2304574
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68916}
We cannot allocate large arrays exceeding the size of
kMaxRegularHeapObjectSize in young space. Bailout of optimization in
such cases.
Bug: chromium:1105746
Change-Id: I4f7357c2dd7b3e70d747f9067660725ecf6ae768
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2300481
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68889}
mjsunit/regress/regress-896326.js failed on mips simulator, because mips
simulator has larger stack size and won't throw the expected RangeError
exception.
This CL set sim-stack-size to 100K in regress-896326 just like setting
the native machine's stack-size.
Change-Id: I51328b10a7b54addab2adb90401680c0581d7ee2
Bug: v8:10709
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2299880
Commit-Queue: Zhao Jiazhong <zhaojiazhong-hf@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68865}
This is a follow-up fix for
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2292230
In this CL fixes the case when the property cell is added to the
dictionary but the value is not actually stored which leaves
PropertyCell with the hole in the dictionary.
Now the logic for GlobalDictionary matches the logic for
NameDictionary - the property cell is added to the dictionary in
LookupIterator::ApplyTransitionToDataProperty().
Bug: chromium:1104711, chromium:1105383
Change-Id: I56da16d85d13288fbc41fd60dbce556fec5e7d18
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2297472
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68860}
The named LoadIC code was missing a check for "names" that
convert to TypedArray indices. This was flushed out by the
recent bump of the max TypedArray size from 2^32-1 to 2^32.
Named StoreICs had the same bug; fixed here as well.
Bug: v8:4153
Fixed: chromium:1104608
Change-Id: I6bd2552d6ccc238104f92e7b95d19970d4a75dae
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2295606
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68840}
For 64-bit binary operations, Liftoff on arm made the assumption that
register pairs are always ordered, i.e. the register code for the low
word is lower than the register code for the high word.
Ensuring this was only implemented in {GetUnusedRegister} in
https://crrev.com/c/2168875. Other cases were missing though, e.g.
return values, but also different places were we
construct register pairs internally.
Thus, this CL removes this constraint again and instead handles
unordered register pairs in 64-bit binary operations on arm.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1101304
Change-Id: I4cd9fb1577f82ab06d34c9dde6533cf04a2cade7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2287870
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68752}
After r68405 reduced the default stack size on Arm64 a couple of tests
hit stack limits on the Arm64 android bots. Reduce the argument count
on these tests to avoid this issue.
BUG=chromium:1099623
Change-Id: I8957043b74bd416bb78223599b1a661a4887f54a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2280095
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68670}
An 'arguments' array cannot be allocated in young space when its size
exceeds kMaxRegularHeapObjectSize. In this case the optimizations in
JSCreateLowering::ReduceJSCreateArguments are skipped.
Bug: chromium:1098565
Change-Id: I30fdc78a1eb6e51fcd293785a46c9fd78995da9a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2273121
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68585}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The IsInBounds function is used in a few different places, when used for
bounds checks on 32-bit platforms, size_t for max_memory_size leads to
incorrect out of bounds accesses as size_t is not guaranteed to be
64-bit on all platforms. Use specific uint32_t, uint64_t methods for
Wasm bounds checking instead of size_t.
Bug: chromium:1080902
Change-Id: I0e21f0a310382c8ed0703c8302200d3352495c13
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2256858
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68500}
Due to recent spec changes, this CL removes the type immediate of
ref.is_null again. Instead we check if the type of the input parameter
is nullable.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: If07d30fe4dd27664be7774422573b2ab2b0dfa20
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2247654
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68484}
When preparsing and detecting a sloppy block function redefinition then
don't mark the variable as assigned to make it consistent with the eager
parser.
Bug: chromium:1053364
Change-Id: Iec7c24db80014bfe73ee41a4f3bb7a41a354cef2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2241511
Auto-Submit: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68415}
This subsumes the old behavior of --allow-natives-for-fuzzing under
--fuzzing as well. Both flags are used in a redundant way in fuzz
configs. Only --allow-natives-for-fuzzing wasn't specified as a
required argument, leading to the bug below.
We still need the flag --allow-natives-for-differential-fuzzing
to allow different functions when using differential fuzzing.
Bug: chromium:1094866
Change-Id: I398791779e58ed4d80e896c1cfea343848159212
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2246568
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68401}
We recently changed uc32 to be an unsigned type, and with the invalid
marker being static_cast<uc32>(-1) this DCHECK no longer holds. After
this CL it expicitly checks for the invalid marker.
Bug: v8:10568,chromium:1094226
Change-Id: Idd9efe055b38387e3e37b132cb786cca130767b3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245592
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68333}
