Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
includes collection of allocation site feedback.
Reland of https://codereview.chromium.org/2190293003/ with a bug fix.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2225923003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39120}
Drive-by fix: the order of parameters in the BinaryOpWithFeedback TurboFan code stubs now reflects the convention of having the context at the end.
BUG=v8:5273
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2263253002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38832}
The old code was using VariableMode, but that signal is both
over-pessimistic (some CONST and LET variables need no hole-initialization)
and inconsistent with other uses of the InitializationFlag enum (such
as %LoadLookupSlot).
This changes no observable behavior, but removes unnecessary hole
initialization and hole checks in a few places, including
block-scoped function declarations, super property lookups,
and new.target.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2201193004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38395}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Fails on nosnap debug:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug/builds/8403
Original issue's description:
> [Interpreter] Collect type feedback for 'new' in the bytecode handler
>
> Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
> earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
> because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
> This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
> includes collection of allocation site feedback.
>
> BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/9d5e6129c4c7f9cbfe81a5fad2a470f219fe137c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38364}
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,balazs.kilvady@imgtec.com,mythria@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2212343002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38368}
Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
includes collection of allocation site feedback.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2190293003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38364}
Reason for revert:
This cl causes a large regression in octane (https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=629503). I have to investigate the reason before I can reland this.
Original issue's description:
> [Interpreter] Collect type feedback for 'new' in the bytecode handler
>
> Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
> current implementation does not collect allocation site feedback.
>
> BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/1eadc76419b323fb2e55ae9953142f801704aa59
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37862}
TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2165633003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37872}
Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
current implementation does not collect allocation site feedback.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37862}
Introduces fused bytecodes for fusing LdaSmi followed by a binary op bytecode.
The chosen bytecodes are used frequently in Octane: AddSmi, SubSmi,
BitwiseOrSmi, BitwiseAndSmi, ShiftLeftSmi, ShiftRightSmi.
There are additional code stubs for these operations that are biased towards
both the left hand and right hand operands being Smis.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2111923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37531}
With this change the bytecode array builder only emits expression
positions for bytecodes that can throw. This allows more peephole
optimization opportunities and results in smaller code.
BUG=v8:4280,chromium:615979
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2038323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36863}
This change requires a single pass over the register set during
bytecode pipeline flushes.
A few bytecode tests are updated too because the order of register
flushes is different.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2033013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36726}
This change introduces five fused bytecodes for common bytecode
sequences on popular websites. These are LdrNamedProperty,
LdrKeyedProperty, LdrGlobal, LdrContextSlot, and LdrUndefined. These
load values into a destination register operand instead of the
accumulator. They are emitted by the peephole optimizer.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1985753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36507}
Prints source position information alongside bytecode.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1963663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36171}
This change introduces wide prefix bytecodes to support wide (16-bit)
and extra-wide (32-bit) operands. It retires the previous
wide-bytecodes and reduces the number of operand types.
Operands are now either scalable or fixed size. Scalable operands
increase in width when a bytecode is prefixed with wide or extra-wide.
The bytecode handler table is extended to 256*3 entries. The
first 256 entries are used for bytecodes with 8-bit operands,
the second 256 entries are used for bytecodes with operands that
scale to 16-bits, and the third group of 256 entries are used for
bytecodes with operands that scale to 32-bits.
LOG=N
BUG=v8:4747,v8:4280
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1783483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34955}