Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexey Kozyatinskiy
0896586083 [inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function
Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).

BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
position. It's general treatment for most cases.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
- debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
  implementation,
- BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
  generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
  on first generated bytecode,
- it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
  like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
  bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
..->BuildReturnPrologue();
..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
..->Return();

In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
position when we emit return bytecode right here.

So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
functions, I'll address async functions later.

[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/

Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 19:10:13 +00:00
dgozman
7bbea08f66 [inspector] Refactor protocol-test.js
This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and
gives full control over what's happening to the test code.
It also forces description for every test.

BUG=none

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
2017-05-19 00:35:45 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
270db7903a [inspector] added inspector test runner [part 5]
- added most part of inspector tests that depends only on JavaScript domains.

BUG=chromium:635948
R=dgozman@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/9ddbdab195923fc87fae3587ae06c5c1c5ca6d79
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2369753004
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39897}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39931}
2016-10-02 21:23:03 +00:00
machenbach
ee0d69910b Revert "[inspector] added inspector test runner [part 3-5]"
Revert "[inspector] added inspector test runner [part 3]"

This reverts commit f3f9f4448d.

Revert "[inspector] added inspector test runner [part 4]"

This reverts commit 4a5f5d0991.

Revert "[inspector] added inspector test runner [part 5]"

This reverts commit 9ddbdab195.

Reverting this in order to revert parts 1-2 which block the roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2379053003/

BUG=chromium:635948
TBR=kozyatinskiy@chromium.org,
NOTRY=true

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2379303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39908}
2016-09-30 09:25:31 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
9ddbdab195 [inspector] added inspector test runner [part 5]
- added most part of inspector tests that depends only on JavaScript domains.

BUG=chromium:635948
R=dgozman@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2369753004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39897}
2016-09-30 04:50:17 +00:00